Accrington Web - View Single Post

choirboy · 02-08-2016, 21:19

Looking at the photo, in particular, comparing the standing figures with Chapman, Buxton and Pearson it looks like we could have signed a 'bit of height' in some of the new boys!

Anybody think that we can read anything into the allocation of the 'lower' squad numbers? Perhaps with the exception of Seamus...28 and Billy...29?

02-08-2016, 21:19	#14
choirboy Senior Member+ Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Clayton le Moors Posts: 3,013 Liked: 2202 times Rep Power: 230532	Re: Squad Numbers Looking at the photo, in particular, comparing the standing figures with Chapman, Buxton and Pearson it looks like we could have signed a 'bit of height' in some of the new boys! Anybody think that we can read anything into the allocation of the 'lower' squad numbers? Perhaps with the exception of Seamus...28 and Billy...29?