Accrington Web - View Single Post

Exile on Spencer St · 28-08-2020, 11:03

Couple of interesting articles about the ‘tests’ that are being used to continue the dempanic restrictions taken from the Lockdown Sceptics web site.

I found the first link from the second, but it’s probably is easier to read them this way round.
Below the second link, are the comments under the video from CiderGuy who suggests the false positive rate is not 2% (which is bad enough) but, according to the inventor of the PCR ‘test’, is over 80%!

https://www.weblyf.com/2020/05/coron...other-experts/

2% false positive rate for testing infectious disease with the PCR test? Really? Where did you get that claim from? The reason I ask is because it's genius Nobel laureate creator Kary Mullis calls garbage on that one. He claims 80%+ when used for testing on infectious disease (plus the obvious false negatives too) and said it should NEVER be used for that purpose EVER as his brilliant test was never designed for such a purpose and cannot even distinguish between infectious diseases.

The swab test would need to be a pure sample in the first place so how can a random swab inserted in either nose or mouth even begin to provide a pure sample? Impossible! It could be anything plus the PCR test when being (wrongly!) used as it is for these test is often upto 45 cycles tested on a sample which is ridiculous, even Kary Mullis said that if you have to go above 30 cycles to get a result then give up as you're never going to get an accurate, real result and that you could make a wrong positive result for just about anything you ever tested for.. How many million or even billions is the un-purified sample being magnified at when you reach 45 magnification cycles? Utterly laughable.

No, the reason the rt-PCR test is being used here, despite it being the completely inappropriate and deceitful test, is pretty obvious I'd say. It is not an error of judgment on their part, they are not that stupid. No, they are using this test because it is providing the results they want. It's no wonder worldwide the response has been test, test, test. Mission accomplished.

28-08-2020, 11:03	#951
Exile on Spencer St God Member Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: Hogshire Posts: 5,392 Liked: 5529 times Rep Power: 264924	Re: Corona Virus Couple of interesting articles about the ‘tests’ that are being used to continue the dempanic restrictions taken from the Lockdown Sceptics web site. I found the first link from the second, but it’s probably is easier to read them this way round. Below the second link, are the comments under the video from CiderGuy who suggests the false positive rate is not 2% (which is bad enough) but, according to the inventor of the PCR ‘test’, is over 80%! https://www.weblyf.com/2020/05/coron...other-experts/ 2% false positive rate for testing infectious disease with the PCR test? Really? Where did you get that claim from? The reason I ask is because it's genius Nobel laureate creator Kary Mullis calls garbage on that one. He claims 80%+ when used for testing on infectious disease (plus the obvious false negatives too) and said it should NEVER be used for that purpose EVER as his brilliant test was never designed for such a purpose and cannot even distinguish between infectious diseases. The swab test would need to be a pure sample in the first place so how can a random swab inserted in either nose or mouth even begin to provide a pure sample? Impossible! It could be anything plus the PCR test when being (wrongly!) used as it is for these test is often upto 45 cycles tested on a sample which is ridiculous, even Kary Mullis said that if you have to go above 30 cycles to get a result then give up as you're never going to get an accurate, real result and that you could make a wrong positive result for just about anything you ever tested for.. How many million or even billions is the un-purified sample being magnified at when you reach 45 magnification cycles? Utterly laughable. No, the reason the rt-PCR test is being used here, despite it being the completely inappropriate and deceitful test, is pretty obvious I'd say. It is not an error of judgment on their part, they are not that stupid. No, they are using this test because it is providing the results they want. It's no wonder worldwide the response has been test, test, test. Mission accomplished. Last edited by Exile on Spencer St; 28-08-2020 at 11:05.