[Exile on Spencer St]

Guinness, I too am not making any political point. A pox on all their houses!

(A) that’s one hell of an expensive bet, seven times what you’d need, if all the ‘vaccines’ work as we’re constantly told! Like putting a pound to win on every horse in a race. But what the hell, it’s only tax payers’ money.
(B) Fair point, but it assumes firms at the start of a supply chain will return to full production BEFORE furlough ends, in order for other firms to be able to pick up later on. If I was producing, say, beer, why would I risk gearing up my production for pubs, hotels and clubs that may or may not be allowed to start up fully again?
(C) so, those who, using the right enshrined in international law and through the principle of informed consent, choose not to take an experimental vaccine will be excluded from society? Don’t recall AIDS passports when that ‘pandemic’ was all the world talked about.
(D) And will it be with us for a very long time because the vaccines aren’t, as Margaret has pointed out, not really vaccines? We’ve had flu viruses for millennia but never before thought to employ non-medics to control the public. Or will these ‘Marshalls’ end up picking up all the discarded masks that seem to litter streets today (funny how the council’s don’t feel the need to provide bio-secure waste disposal bins for such potentially lethal items).

I would like to think that any rational person agrees that it’s wrong to cancel open debate and to shout/shut down contrary views, but why does it still happen and why did Ofcom issue an edict to all media outlets last year ‘advising’ them NOT to deviate from the Govt’s narrative?