[Acrylic-bob]

So it’s all a harmless bit of nonsense, “twaddle” as Ossyclogger says. A bit of something to fill the space between the real stories.

But take a closer look at what the chap is actually saying.

Firstly he accurately predicts the name Ratzinger chose. In itself this is remarkable, I myself would have thought that in this age of the politically correct no one would have dared to choose anything other than John Paul III. Then he goes on to predict that the new pontificate will be a short one. Ok, Vatican tradition is to follow long papacies with short ones. But not always. Ratzinger is 78 and he himself estimates that he has five to seven years left to him. Which takes us to around 2010-2012.

Then he predicts a small war among the Arab Nations in 2009, well within the term Ratzinger estimates for his papacy. This is followed by a papal suggestion of creating three “booths” or places of worship in Jerusalem. Possibly as an attempt to pour oil on troubled waters. The idea fails to find support and a larger war is declared on America and the West in 2010, still within the term of the new papacy.

But this is surely a ridiculous idea. How can anyone believe that the relatively backward Arab nations could hope to prosecute a war against the technologically sophisticated west?



Read this…http://worldnetdaily.com/news/articl...TICLE_ID=43963



And this…http://www.spacedaily.com/news/iran-05n.html

And think again.