[WillowTheWhisp]

Originally Posted by jambutty

I see that you are still hogging the moral high ground with your holier than thou attitude whilst making snide remarks.

Yet do not have the moral fibre to address your facile remarks direct to the person.

If the cap fits............

Please note that I did not mention anyone by name intentionally. On your original thread on a similar subject to this I agreed with your point of view until the thread went off on a tangent to pursue the line that someone who has a disabled badge should be entitled to park in a disabled space even if driving there on behalf of someone else and remaining in the car whilst the other person went shopping. I still maintain that this is equally unacceptable and depriving a disabled person of a space they may need.

Why should it be wrong of me to reiterate that point?

Why do you condemn this as 'moral high ground' when the whole point of this and your previous thread is that disabled parking bays are there for use by disabled customers? I am merely agreeing with that point of view, your point of view. Why do you find this so objectionable?