Quote:
Originally Posted by flashytart
excuse me, Reece takes a variety of meals to school with him, sometimes he takes soup, salad or a sandwhich, he takes a yogurt, cherry tomato's for a snack an orange or banana a drink and sometimes a packet of crisps
now i'm sorry Kate but i'd rather him have that than have nothing to eat at all...school dinners arent what they used to be when i was little, they are CRAP
|
Its funny that he's allowed to take soup, I once tried to take things that are eaten hot for my dinners at primary school and wasn't allowed, and free school meals are aimed at ages 4-16, so you have to consider these things.
I think providing a free school meal to all children is a very good idea, and whilst I have always had free school meals myself, I know people from big families who fail to get the benefits due to parental income, yet struggle much more than I ever have, and benefits in some cases should be assessed in a broader criteria, particularly with children who have many siblings and a relatively small parental income, as they don't often consider how many children the income has to be spread between.
I don't agree with the entire child benefit being scrapped for the sake of free meals though, as many people depend on this AND free school meals, for purposes such as clothing and sending their child to school, and I'm sure many probably may even put some away every week or whatever to contribute towards future educational expenses such as trips or even university and such.
I know people who blatantly had no lunch at school, though mainly high school, and whether it was because they just didnt get money off their parents or whether they spent it themselves on other things they felt they needed, it's atrocious that some people just starve during the day like that. Thankfully I've never had to face that problem.