Quote:
Originally Posted by shakermaker
Getting back on thread...
I would put forward that the vast majority of people who want a referendum have not read or at least understood the Treaty. How can you have a referendum for public opinion on something when the majority haven't a clue about it?
I believe Greg Pope was entirely correct in commenting that it is wrong for people who have a negative view of Britain in Europe to use a referendum on a quite separate issue to bash Britain's European stance by proxy. It devalues the idea of a referendum and in my opinion is extremely petty.
On Question Time last night (07/03/08), Marcus Brigstocke put forward the point that it is politicians' job to understand and act upon treaties such as the one in debate on our behalf. It does not mean you do not have a voice. As Greg Pope said, if people in Hyndburn or in any other MP's constituency told their MP of their outright dislike for the treaty, then the MP would represent that in parliament.
However seeing as all this business about referenda is entirely centred around point scoring by the idiotic opposition parties; no one properly understands what they want a referendum on!!
|
Well considering that this treaty is 98% compatible with the constitution which was withdrawn, foregive me in thinking that this is more legislation from Brussels through the back door. How many times do we have to be shafted by the EU before this govenment is going to listen to the people. This Prime minster, when only in office a couple of days said that he was going to be different and would listen to the people of Britain, I for one am still waiting