|
Re: new concession for terror bill.
Quote:
Originally Posted by andrewb
Garinda your whole argument suggests that we should go to 42 days, because you feel it might help prevent deaths (all the evidence says the opposite). I have given reason why we should keep with 28 days, because it has actually been used. Can you please give reason as to why we should go for 42 days and not 50 days, 100days, 1000days? Because All of those might prevent loss of life, under your current argument.
|
Like I said wayyyyyyyyyy back in this thread I'd have no problem if the period was even longer, if it prevented just one more death.
Yes, there are more deaths on the roads of this country, but that really isn't much of a comfort if you are a small child, and it is your mother who has been blown up.
__________________
'If you're going to be a Kant, be the very best Kant there is my son.'
Johann Georg Kant, father of Immanuel Kant, philosopher.
|