28-09-2008, 09:42
|
#38
|
Apprentice Geriatric
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Darwen, Lancashire
Posts: 3,706
Liked: 0 times
Rep Power: 89
|
Re: Photo Competition 52
Quote:
Originally Posted by Margaret Pilkington
Jambutty, you are never lost for words, as the above post proves.
And as far as pointing out flaws in the rules...if you think the rules are flawed then you can locate a moderator and put it to them,(for the consideration of perhaps being changed) and also, if you think the rules are flawed...you need not enter the competition.
I don't particularly like the aspersions you cast over the members of this forum...we aren't all the same......you may not like some of us, but there is no need to lump us all in the same category.
|
Let me see if I have got this right.
If I point out a loophole in the rules that CAN be exploited it is deemed as me casting aspersions over the members of this forum, is not OK and you object to it.
Yet an avatar that that actually calls every person stupid because they cannot see a non-existent picture is defended by most, I’m told that I have no sense of humour because it was a joke, it is OK.
A severe case of double standards if ever there was one. But then that is the case from some forum members.
Pray tell me, how was I to find out about the loophole except by entering the competition?
I responded to an appeal asking for more people to join the photo competition, discovered the loophole and decided to bring it out into the open to see what other people’s views were.
|
|
|