28-09-2008, 10:28
|
#43
|
Apprentice Geriatric
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Darwen, Lancashire
Posts: 3,706
Liked: 0 times
Rep Power: 89
|
Re: Photo Competition 52
Quote:
Originally Posted by Margaret Pilkington
Jambutty, you take the cake..you really do.
I bet you were what is the equivalent of a barrack room lawyer.
What I was pointing out was the way you have gone about pointing out what you see as a loophole in the rules.
You feel you can make snide and scathing comments about our(the forum members) integrity in voting....I find that offensive, because it isn't how I operate.
And yet you choose to judge me....and all the other members of the forum.
Yes...we do want members to participate in the competition, but not if they are going to question the motives of the participants and other members of the forum.
I'm sure my opinions do not matter one jot to you....a nd the fact that I feel offended by your attitude to my integrity...I'm sure will cause you no alarm either.
I think that if you feel so strongly about this competition then perhaps you shouldn't enter it...after all it isn't compulsory to enter...or for that matter, to vote.
This is my last word on this subject
|
Maybe but I don’t have double standards.
You would lose your bet.
As I stated before if I complain about snide comments being made about me those comments are meant as a joke and I should get a sense of humour and I have to accept it.
But when I SUGGEST that the current photo competition COULD be exploited it is wrong and people suddenly take umbrage.
|
|
|