View Single Post
Old 07-09-2009, 14:01   #4
ukcowboy
God Member
 
ukcowboy's Avatar
 

Re: interested onlooker

Quote:
Originally Posted by dagenhamdave View Post
From what I can tell the answer to b) is yes and the answer to c) is general running costs.

Part of the answer to a) appears to be that it actually hasn't been paid for quite a while and now includes interest/late fees.

Is it fair to say that the playing squad was over-invested in, leaving the club in a loss-making position they are struggling to get out of?


From what I can decipher, the tax debt was built up from our conference winning year, probably meaning that players bonuses etc will have pushed the bill up higher than usuall (we won quite a few games that season!!)...........this is NOT an official statement, merely an observation on my part and conjecture

We are in dire straits at the moment and desperatley need all the help we can get, however small................so please if you feel the wish to help feel free to do so :-

www.saveourstanley.co.uk


Thanks Dave.............
__________________
LIFE IS LIKE AN ASHTRAY.........................FULL OF LITTLE DOUBTS

(TUESDAY 3rd NOVEMBER 2009........A PROUD DAY FOR ALL STANLEY FANS)

Messrs Khan and Marsden I thank you

Thursday 31st. March 2011, a new dawn over the Crown ground.
www.dirtyhatband.co.uk
ukcowboy is offline   Reply With Quote