Reading the above I only have questions (some might see it as a Devils Advocat angle but I dont care), not angry statements. Perhaps they truly do not see ASSF as the way forward for the club? Do we know for certain that ASSF
is the only 'offer on the table'? It certainly was one that had a LOT of oomph behind it but was/is it the
only one? Was this 'rather go under' statement just simply a case of engaging mouth before brain (easily done in these times)? Perhaps a more diplomatic response would have been the appropriate one?
Questions questions questions - as someone else's Gran said in another thread, there are 3 sides to every story...
Jimbo T

blower