Accrington Web - View Single Post

DAV007 · 15-10-2009, 14:10

You cant compare David Oneills actions to Eric Whalley dealings

Bin Laden is better at Google Page Ranking than Eric.

O'neill has made the worst possible decision for the club and has not be transarent with the facts, except repeating how he gave £100,000.
The best deal for the club was the ASSF offer, this was not the best deal for David O'neill.
IMO, he has placed his own interest above ASFC.
I dont know how anyone could understand it any other way?

An offer was on the table which would have had accrington stanley with no debt, a broad base of ownership and JC would be abe to bring players in (the ban would have been lifted by now)
Instead, we have MORE debt, same incompetent leadership and no genuine clear ambition/plan to establish Stanley as a football league club.

I hate to say it but the ASSF offer will probably never be matched again.
It was all about the club, all for the club, with only the club at heart.
I hope the ASSF utilise their new share holding to expose the truth, input new fresh ideas and ultimatly raise the profile of the club to ensure investment in the playing squad.
Unless the 11 that cross the line are good enough to stay in league 2, nothing else at the club really matters.

BTW - is it Swindon who are interested in Michael Symes?

15-10-2009, 14:10	#166
DAV007 Senior Member+ Join Date: Jul 2007 Posts: 3,877 Liked: 808 times Rep Power: 6048	Re: 1000 Shares Issue!!! You cant compare David Oneills actions to Eric Whalley dealings Bin Laden is better at Google Page Ranking than Eric. O'neill has made the worst possible decision for the club and has not be transarent with the facts, except repeating how he gave £100,000. The best deal for the club was the ASSF offer, this was not the best deal for David O'neill. IMO, he has placed his own interest above ASFC. I dont know how anyone could understand it any other way? An offer was on the table which would have had accrington stanley with no debt, a broad base of ownership and JC would be abe to bring players in (the ban would have been lifted by now) Instead, we have MORE debt, same incompetent leadership and no genuine clear ambition/plan to establish Stanley as a football league club. I hate to say it but the ASSF offer will probably never be matched again. It was all about the club, all for the club, with only the club at heart. I hope the ASSF utilise their new share holding to expose the truth, input new fresh ideas and ultimatly raise the profile of the club to ensure investment in the playing squad. Unless the 11 that cross the line are good enough to stay in league 2, nothing else at the club really matters. BTW - is it Swindon who are interested in Michael Symes? Last edited by DAV007; 15-10-2009 at 14:12.