Accrington Web

Accrington Web (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/index.php)
-   DVD/TV/Film Discussion (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f134/)
-   -   Coast (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f134/coast-42693.html)

Neil 22-09-2008 11:35

Re: Coast
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jambutty (Post 633559)
If the BBC did not sell their programmes all around the world, it would not have the funds to make quality programmes like it does and in order to do so the licence fee would have to increase substantially.

I did not say they cant sell it around the world. I asked why licence payers are having to pay twice. As a licence payer you should get it at cost - we have already paid for the program.

jambutty 22-09-2008 12:26

Re: Coast
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Neil (Post 633568)
I did not say they cant sell it around the world. I asked why licence payers are having to pay twice. As a licence payer you should get it at cost - we have already paid for the program.

I didn’t say that you did, but why let the reality spoil the start of an “I said, you said” argument.

I was just pointing out that if you object to having to pay twice by buying a DVD of a BBC programme, the same applies to subscribing to commercial pay as you view channels. But you don’t hear any arguments about that.

It seems to me that instead of regaling us with your views on the Coast programme, which is what this thread is all about, you decided to have a poke about the license fee and the BBC.

People will happily pay to rent a DVD of a film or pay two or three times as much to buy it.

I happen to think that buying DVD’s of BBC programmes is not only good value but also aids Aunty Beeb to produce more first rate programmes. Of course it also helps to pay certain programme presenters exorbitant salaries, but that is a different issue.

Neil 22-09-2008 13:17

Re: Coast
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jambutty (Post 633573)
I happen to think that buying DVD’s of BBC programmes is not only good value but also aids Aunty Beeb to produce more first rate programmes. Of course it also helps to pay certain programme presenters exorbitant salaries, but that is a different issue.

That is because you have been brainwashed by the beeb and can't see the reality of it.

Please explain why the BBC is so good we should all pay for it if we want to watch it or not.

jambutty 22-09-2008 18:01

Re: Coast
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Neil (Post 633585)
That is because you have been brainwashed by the beeb and can't see the reality of it.

Please explain why the BBC is so good we should all pay for it if we want to watch it or not.

The only people who are brain washed are those who still think that the TV license is to watch BBC programmes and pointedly refuse to accept that this is not the case.

You don’t pay just to watch BBC programmes. If the BBC didn’t exist we would still have to pay the annual TV license fee.

The TV license authorises the installation and use of video receiving equipment in a house, pub, hotel etc. and you can watch whatever broadcasts are available to you, regardless where they come from. In private domestic property the single license covers all the TV sets in that property.

Neil 22-09-2008 18:23

Re: Coast
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jambutty (Post 633701)
The only people who are brain washed are those who still think that the TV license is to watch BBC programmes and pointedly refuse to accept that this is not the case.

You don’t pay just to watch BBC programmes. If the BBC didn’t exist we would still have to pay the annual TV license fee.

The TV license authorises the installation and use of video receiving equipment in a house, pub, hotel etc. and you can watch whatever broadcasts are available to you, regardless where they come from. In private domestic property the single license covers all the TV sets in that property.

You know that is only a play on words as to what the licence is really for. Its to pay for the BBC, that's where the majority of the money goes.

You know it does but you like to pretend that if there was no BBC we would still pay such a high fee.

jambutty 22-09-2008 18:47

Re: Coast
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Neil (Post 633715)
You know that is only a play on words as to what the licence is really for. Its to pay for the BBC, that's where the majority of the money goes.

You know it does but you like to pretend that if there was no BBC we would still pay such a high fee.

No play on words Neil. It’s a fact.

Have a look at http://www.tvlicensing.co.uk/index.jsp

Nowhere does it specifically refer to the BBC.

The BBC being a public service broadcaster is funded from government funds better known as taxpayer’s money. Doesn’t that make it paying three times for a BBC programme DVD? The government recoups this outlay with the license fee. The BBC is charged with collecting the license money and keeping tabs on who has or has not got a current license.

High fee? £139.50 for a colour license has to be the deal of the century. That’s just a smidgin over 38 pence per day. It would cost you more than ten times that just to go and watch a film in a cinema.

Neil 22-09-2008 19:06

Re: Coast
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jambutty (Post 633723)
No play on words Neil. It’s a fact.

Have a look at http://www.tvlicensing.co.uk/index.jsp

Nowhere does it specifically refer to the BBC.

And that is why you have been suckered in. You cant see the wood for the trees.


All times are GMT. The time now is 15:26.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com