Accrington Web
Page 14 of 65 « First 45678910111213 14 1516171819202122232464 Last »
Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

Accrington Web (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/index.php)
-   DVD/TV/Film Discussion (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f134/)
-   -   Allegations about Jimmy Saville: covered up? (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f134/allegations-about-jimmy-saville-covered-up-60781.html)

MargaretR 05-10-2012 16:15
Re: Sir Jimmy Saville
 
Unfortunately Operation Ore was discredited by a spanner thrown in the works due to police incompetence - some innocent men were charged on the basis that their credit card numbers were held by a dodgy porn website.

Some of those card numbers were obtained by fraud. The police barged in with both feet, not discriminating beforehand which were real voyeurs and which were setup red herrings.

The Operation Ore was abandoned by a D notice issued by Blair
'Blair covering up paedophile scandal?' | www.tpuc.org

Eric 05-10-2012 16:20
Re: Sir Jimmy Saville
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris SUI JURIS (Post 1021188)
I assume that liz who Acts as the Queen knighted him? I wonder how many other of the queen's knights are pedophiles,rapist etc? :eek:
Oh, by the way, welcome to the Funny Farm:D You can have fun on here ... and get serious if you wish;) Bienvenue.

Boeing Guy 05-10-2012 16:30
Re: Sir Jimmy Saville
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris SUI JURIS (Post 1021188)
I assume that liz who Acts as the Queen knighted him? I wonder how many other of the queen's knights are pedophiles,rapist etc? :eek:

Any proof?
Already done to death on another thread

Chris SUI JURIS 05-10-2012 16:34
Re: Sir Jimmy Saville
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eric (Post 1021197)
If this is some sort of attempt to smear the Queen, who is popular with many in your country and in mine, it is pretty lame. As far as I am aware, it is the U.K. government who puts forward the names of those who are to be honored. If I'm wrong about this, feel free etc. It's not like there's a Round Table any more.:rolleyes: And from what I read ... and my comprehension level is, at least, average ... there are numerous allegations agaist the puissant knight, but nothing which can be called "proof". Not to mention that he just might not show up in court to defend himself. If he does, then that will be newsworthy.
No its not a attempt to smear your Queen Eric :rolleyes:

don't get me started on the UK government :D you may be right (sounds plausible) it was just a open question.

As for "proof" the allegations would suggest he spent his life building up a front (chairty work etc) to abuse young girls...my comprehension level is also at least average and the allegations would suggest Jimbo was down with da kids but not in a good way ;)

Restless 05-10-2012 16:37
Re: Sir Jimmy Saville
 
There is already subject about this crap. Post it there.

Oh just out of curiosity. Are you the same Chris that was banned??

Boeing Guy 05-10-2012 16:37
Re: Sir Jimmy Saville
 
What about your words on another thread, Innocent till proved guilty?

Chris SUI JURIS 05-10-2012 16:38
Re: Sir Jimmy Saville
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by MargaretR (Post 1021198)
Unfortunately Operation Ore was discredited by a spanner thrown in the works due to police incompetence - some innocent men were charged on the basis that their credit card numbers were held by a dodgy porn website.

Some of those card numbers were obtained by fraud. The police barged in with both feet, not discriminating beforehand which were real voyeurs and which were setup red herrings.

The Operation Ore was abandoned by a D notice issued by Blair
'Blair covering up paedophile scandal?' | www.tpuc.org
NOT JUST BLAIR marg...the BBC have been covering up his antics for yrs ;)

Boeing Guy 05-10-2012 16:39
Re: Sir Jimmy Saville
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris SUI JURIS (Post 1021205)
NOT JUST BLAIR marg...the BBC have been covering up his antics for yrs ;)

Anyone got any hard proof......... Not websites, real evidence.

MargaretR 05-10-2012 16:41
Re: Sir Jimmy Saville
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Restless (Post 1021203)
There is already subject about this crap. Post it there.

Oh just out of curiosity. Are you the same Chris that was banned??
Sui juris = 'of one’s own laws'
...I think we have a Freeman on the Land follower.

Restless 05-10-2012 16:46
Re: Sir Jimmy Saville
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by MargaretR (Post 1021207)
Sui juris = 'of one’s own laws'
...I think we have a Freeman on the Land follower.
yeah sounds like accychris

Chris SUI JURIS 05-10-2012 16:48
Re: Sir Jimmy Saville
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boeing Guy (Post 1021204)
What about your words on another thread, Innocent till proved guilty?
yes folk are suppose to be innocent till proven (not that thats the case in most court cases). unless numerous victim allegations are made against the same offender then it should be innocent till proven.but my opinion is that theres no smoke without fire in this case.....(just my opinion) not saying its right :)

Boeing Guy 05-10-2012 16:50
Re: Sir Jimmy Saville
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris SUI JURIS (Post 1021209)
yes folk are suppose to be innocent till proven (not that thats the case in most court cases). unless numerous victim allegations are made against the same offender then it should be innocent till proven.but my opinion is that theres no smoke without fire in this case.....(just my opinion) not saying its right :)
I could reply to that, but.....I cannot be bothered.

Royboy39 05-10-2012 17:35
Re: Sir Jimmy Saville
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boeing Guy (Post 1021206)
Anyone got any hard proof........,
Try this.........

Janet Street Porter heard about Jimmy Savile abuse claims - IV Drip - Voices - The Independent

jaysay 05-10-2012 17:40
Re: Sir Jimmy Saville
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Restless (Post 1021203)
There is already subject about this crap. Post it there.

Oh just out of curiosity. Are you the same Chris that was banned??
Think you may well have something there Restless, ya can change a name but thats all, as Bee has found out on a few occasions

jaysay 05-10-2012 17:54
re: Allegations about Jimmy Saville: covered up?
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by cashman (Post 1021176)
That does not make her credible.
Well maybe if these people had come out of the woodwork 5 years ago, then maybe we would have got some answers, now its at best hearsay or at worst fabrication


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:27.
Page 14 of 65 « First 45678910111213 14 1516171819202122232464 Last »
Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com