![]() |
Re: Hyndburn to be axed.
Quote:
Oh Polish, as in Poland. Doh.:D |
Re: Hyndburn to be axed.
Strange... I had done a search on Hyndburn to see the effect on changing the name...
I didn't do a search on the other which has surprising result... "Accrington and district" gets a lot of hits.. including garth dawsons page which i host and run for him.... i didnt realise i had that in it hehe :) So loads of people already use the term.. i really hadn't realised. |
Re: Hyndburn to be axed.
To test it out, and see how it felt, I typed in another thread, 'Accrington and District', instead of Hyndburn, when referring to this generic area.
Thirteen bloody more letters to type out! This is dicrimination against the dexterously disabled. |
Re: Hyndburn to be axed.
Quote:
|
Re: Hyndburn to be axed.
Quote:
|
Re: Hyndburn to be axed.
[QUOTE=garinda;434048]
Quote:
'As for the cost of a sign... That can vary a great deal. Gateway signs usually have to be designed, then consulted on (to make sure everybody likes them, or that suitable apathy is created that no-one bothers responding), produced, planned for and installed. The only thing I can say for sure is that this will cost more than £20,000. The engineering/installation costs alone could run into £££££. If you are really that interested, you could take a stab at costing it yourself based on information contained within a publication called SPONS. SPONS publishes the rates of building materials and construction costs nationally (it might be available on the internet). You'd need to cost for: 2X aluminium poles 1X Mounting board with reflective microprismatic cover Sunday working at 2X workmen (or UGGS as I like to call them) Sawcut of carriageway Removal of footway surface materials Reinstatement of footway surface materials (200mm binder, 750mm sub course, 1500mm concrete, 75mm surface coarse-bitumnious tarmacadam and spray on tac-coat) As you can probably deduce from the list of materials/work that is required for multiple signs this will surely cost more than £20,000 - but then I'm not sure what the £20,000 is for - maybe it's just for designing the sign.' |
Re: Hyndburn to be axed.
What do you reckon the chances are of a fully itemised breakdown of cost before members of the public are officially asked to give their opinions?
|
Re: Hyndburn to be axed.
Quote:
|
Re: Hyndburn to be axed.
[quote=katex;435072]
Quote:
|
Re: Hyndburn to be axed.
Did you see the Trevor McDonald programme tonight .. about council's waste of money, 4 cases and the public chose the best one :D Didn't quite catch all of it, but one was by Worcester City Council and the re-branding of their logo, image etc. They got some students to design in an hour against the professionals ... only took them an hour .. think the voting by the passing public was fairly even.
Must admit thought the professional one was the best myself, however, the design alone had cost £ 24,000 ! Can still offer your council the chance to be a candidate on this programme.:D:D |
Re: Hyndburn to be axed.
Well, it would be tempting but we still don't really know how much is going to be wasted on this renaming malarky do we?
|
Re: Hyndburn to be axed.
That's all I've been trying to say Willow!:)
|
Re: Hyndburn to be axed.
Quote:
|
Re: Hyndburn to be axed.
Quote:
Nice bit of spin. |
Re: Hyndburn to be axed.
This morning as I was driving up New Lane I noticed that Peter Britcliffe's house is up for sale.Has he resorted to selling his house to raise the necessary funds? Lol.:D
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 11:35. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com