![]() |
Genetically modified crops
The report about the experimental/controlled growing in Uk is due out tomorrow,
and our government will then decide whether or not to allow it to be permitted nationwide. The purpose of genetic modification is to make the crop resistant to herbicides, so that they can grow whilst intensively sprayed but the weeds will die. The weeds are essential for insects, birds, bees and butterflies. I object to use of herbicides, which will pass poison into the food produced. At the same time, I am aware of worldwide food shortages, and this will increase food production. So we have Hobsons choice - die of starvation or toxic poisoning BBC NEWS | Science/Nature | GM study shows potential 'harm' |
Re: Genetically modified crops
Prince Charles dosent like the idea of GM food crops..but then he's not likely to go starving is he?
|
Re: Genetically modified crops
Food that will grow anywhere resistant to everything and x10000 bigger what we have now - tbh i think those starving will be willing to take the risk.
|
Re: Genetically modified crops
Quote:
|
Re: Genetically modified crops
and ..lets be honest..there are bods on here that would like to genetically rearrange human beings by sterolosation..because they regard some new borns as "unwanted"
|
Re: Genetically modified crops
kind of an odd anomaly but it seems when food is scarce the birth rate goes up, so I guess obesity eventually leads to infertility . :confused:
|
Re: Genetically modified crops
I thought the amount of hebicides and other toxins used on crops was at a safe level for human consumption?
We have eaten crops for years which are sprayed with god knows what and we having been killed off yet! I might be getting mixed up with something else though so apologies if thats the case i'm still half asleep! |
Re: Genetically modified crops
Quote:
No such thing as "safe" levels of contamination | Rodale Institute Low levels of toxins accumulate in the body gradually and cause ill health and sometimes death eventually |
Re: Genetically modified crops
Quote:
Why is it still allowed to be done if it can potentially be damaging? |
Re: Genetically modified crops
Quote:
The profits of the multinational companies who produce the poisons have priority over the health of the population. |
Re: Genetically modified crops
I was listening to a programme on R4 the other day concerning farming and food production in the UK. They were discussing the issues of being able to feed the world and the way that farming in the UK isn't really making the most of what we have. This isn't the farmers' fault.
Anyway, one suggestion was that better use could be made farming in the UK if we worked on a global level. For example, rather than trying to farm crops in Africa, where it's hard to arable farm due to the climate, you farm nothing but arable crops in countries where the climate is more suitable e.g. Western Europe for example. That would mean that we'd farm hardly any animals (that would be done elsewhere) and just grow cereals and other such crops. If all the countries worked together and produced the food stuffs that they were best suited to, then this would result in much higher levels of production. Maybe if we followed this model we'd increase food production without having to resort to harmful GM modification? Just an idea, but one that would change the landscape of the British countryside in enormous ways. |
Re: Genetically modified crops
can see a parellel with communisum T.M. sounds great in theory,but will never work.:)
|
Re: Genetically modified crops
Quote:
Sad but true. |
Re: Genetically modified crops
Quote:
If these animals are raised on such distant pastures what about transport costs? We already have people telling us to shop locally and use home grown products, which does seem to make some sort of sense compared with transporting from all corners of the globe, (now that's a phrase that confuses me, we live on a round rock so where are these corners?). How many years ago was it that the European union offered our farmers money to stop using certain areas of land and allow them to go fallow? Perhaps before we export our meat industry we should do something about paying farmers to actually use land that we have rather than encourage them to become part of some giant monoculture? http://www.planetsmilies.com/smilies...nfused0006.gif |
Re: Genetically modified crops
During the second World War this country had to be self sufficient in food production because the germans blocked our imports by preventing many merchant ships from arriving by sinking them en route.
There was a campaign titled 'Dig for Victory' - people began growing and raising livestock in their gardens and backyards. There are signs that this is again beginning to happen. Allotments are in the news - more people want them. I doubt whether we could support ourselves that way now because our population has greatly increased since the 40s It would mean that our diet would not contain the many exotic fruits and veg, but a healthy diet does not depend on them - they just give variety - nobody died for lack of bananas Now we need to grow our own because food prices are spiralling - different cause - same result. Today it has been very busy where I live because the council has delivered a lorry load of compost to the car park next to the allotments - it was a sight to behold - all ages from grandads to kids were shovelling like mad. At least when you grow your own you can avoid eating poison. Remember DDT and Agent Orange DDT - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Agent Orange - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia |
All times are GMT. The time now is 23:23. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com