Accrington Web - The disgusting Tory letter in this weeks Ob

Accrington Web (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/index.php)

- General Chat (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f69/)

- - The disgusting Tory letter in this weeks Ob (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f69/the-disgusting-tory-letter-in-this-weeks-ob-52587.html)

Re: Party Funding..

Quote:

I asked him on three separate e-mails to retract this part (the first time it was rewritten, but it still remains now):

Quote:
Originally Posted by g jones
And the third smear of many...
Last year there co-incidentally there was a Freedom of Information request from a Tory activist about all councillors expenses, and from my perspective particularly my phone bill which was very high. This was due to me being the primarily carer for the last 5 years of her life. I do not know how someone would know to ask for this as it had never been asked for before.

The FOI asked for Mobile Phone expenses but not mileage (mine is £zero) or Carers allowances (£zero again). It also asked for conference allowances for one particular year and no others, the only year I went to a conference. I am amazed how Tory activists can guess just what to ask for to try and cause the maximum damage of personal pain?

The activist concerns has stated to me at the time that this was done without any malice and out of desire for information from all Councillors.

Why would a Tory activist seek this information? It came at a time I was informed people were looking at Council affairs internally for political reasons.

As it was I paid for all personal calls, line by line and met with the Managing Director to make sure everything was satisfactory and he knew fully and clearly my difficulties. My gran had dementia and was dying and being in touch was beyond any cost. She brought me up in later life.

Clearly the headline phone figure would have been damaging information in itself and my suspicion is there was political advantage behind the FOI, possibly at the expense of my grandmother again.
It's essentially about me. All I did was use FOI legislation to request ALL councillors expenses as I was interested in it. There are a lot of supposed links and 'suspicions' in what I just quoted. There are many inaccuracies, for example I did ask for travel expenses. Graham seems to believe that I didn't ask for some things because his were £0 (and therefore no political advantage) except I requested food and it was £0. I had no knowledge of what would be revealed until after they came back, too, of course.

They basically add up to Graham accusing me of requesting the information to political advantage at the expense of his grandmother. To be honest that's a shocking smear on myself.

Neither the letter nor what I have quoted above should ever have been written or published. Graham is doing exactly what he claims he is against. What he has written about me he has only done to back up his case of 'smears by Conservatives'; except when it comes to myself, there is no smear, or malice. I was never aware of his family situation until he informed me himself after the expenses were publicised.

To be honest they're all as pathetic as each other. I couldn't imagine Greg Pope doing something like this.

and this pile of brown offerings is in a thread you started about Party Funding because....

Why didn't you have a really good sob and start a new 'I think I'll go and eat worms', thread rather than wander all over this one?

Sorry that's a question, you don't do questions do you?

Oops another question, still ignore it, you're good at that!

Plus, not everyone would have recognised the person mentioned as you until somebody let it out of the bag.

Re: Party Funding..

Quote:

Originally Posted by Less (Post 803135)

and this pile of brown offerings is in a thread you started about Party Funding because....

Why didn't you have a really good sob and start a new 'I think I'll go and eat worms', thread rather than wander all over this one?

Sorry that's a question, you don't do questions do you?

Oops another question, still ignore it, yor good at that!

Plus, not everyone would have recognised the person mentioned as you until somebody let it out of the bag.

I was replying to Katex. She brought it up here.. if the mods want to take the posts and make a new thread then so be it.

Anyone who read the thread on Accyweb knows it's me.

Re: Party Funding..

Quote:

Originally Posted by andrewb (Post 803136)

I was replying to Katex. She brought it up here.. if the mods want to take the posts and make a new thread then so be it.

Anyone who read the thread on Accyweb knows it's me.

well sorry to ask a question but where did katex bring this blog of grahams up?

I noticed her talking about a letter, but not his blog.
:confused:

Re: Party Funding..

Quote:

Originally Posted by Less (Post 803137)

well sorry to ask a question but where did katex bring this blog of grahams up?

I noticed her talking about a letter, but not his blog.
:confused:

It was to do with the letter! Report it if you think it's in the wrong place. No need to bring it up in this thread.

Re: Party Funding..

Quote:

Originally Posted by andrewb (Post 803139)

No need to bring it up in this thread.

Well said, sense like a long awaited bout of puberty has finally hit you.
:D

The disgusting Tory letter in this weeks Ob

Quote:

Originally Posted by andrewb (Post 803130)

I've now read the letter. I don't think it should have ever been written or published.

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_QKMiXWShBz...0/DSC03652.JPG

I appreciate Andrew coming out and condemning this letter and I am grateful to him for that. He is to be applauded for it.

That letter was the lowest and dirtiest smear attack I can recall.

Firstly on two homes. I do not have two homes. My gran died and the estate is selling the property (Buy The House). The letter used my grans house (by saying another Labour wannabe with two homes) to compare me with the disgraced MP's fiddling two homes and Stephen Byers for hire. It wrongly stated i owned my grans and said essentially I was disgrace for it.

Councillors Lyn Wilson, Peter Britcliffe, Susan Haworth all repeated part or all or all or made reference too this in Full Council as well. It had obviously been discussed by Conservatives and decided it was a beneficial line of attack. Those involved were clearly sick in their thinking when doing this.

Needless to say to using someone who is dead and cannot answer for themselves to twist such a disgusting story should resign.

Secondly it used the pot holes on Hodder Street to add to the smear saying "I used my influence as a Councillor to get my street done up". The Standards Board said exactly word for word: "that there was no evidence or suggestion of any malice or intention of personal gain by Cllr. Jones "

The Tories have been smearing for years and will lower themselves lower than the sewer to cover up the failings to run to run the Borough.