Accrington Web

Accrington Web (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/index.php)
-   General Chat (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f69/)
-   -   The Tories (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f69/the-tories-57812.html)

Houseboy 12-09-2012 09:18

Re: The Tories
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by garinda (Post 1014951)
Er...no, you didn't.

Actually, and somewhat foolishly, you said this...



You were wrong.

Continually still harping on about it doesn't change a thing.

It still leaves you as being wrong.

;)

Do you read something and then decide to put your own meaning to it? I challenge you again, Garinda, where does it say that someone has to be in employment? It says it is based on employment, not whether they are employed or not. Or is your other name Mr. Pedantic?

garinda 12-09-2012 10:02

Re: The Tories
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Houseboy (Post 1015102)
where does it say that someone has to be in employment?

Er...here.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Houseboy (Post 1013898)
Officially, on the a's, b's etc scale, class is based solely on employment not on income or wealth.

Apparently they don't differentiate on such things as whether you need to acquire professional qualifications, or how much is earned, it's 'soley' down to whether you're in employment, or not.

:rolleyes:

I'm afraid because of your inabilty to grasp, and understand simple logic, I won't be asking you back for a second interview, though I wish you well in your search.

:)

jaysay 12-09-2012 10:06

Re: The Tories
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by garinda (Post 1015107)
Er...here.



Apparently they don't differentiate on such things as whether you need to acquire professional qualifications, or how much is earned, it's 'soley' down to whether you're in employment, or not.

:rolleyes:

I'm afraid because of your inabilty to grasp, and understand simple logic, I won't be asking you back for a second interview, though I wish you well in your search.

:)

Thats you Rindi always give give give:D

garinda 12-09-2012 10:13

Re: The Tories
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jaysay (Post 1015108)
Thats you Rindi always give give give:D

I aim to please.

It really is no trouble.

Even for those who've sadly lost their deposit.

:)

jaysay 12-09-2012 10:14

Re: The Tories
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by garinda (Post 1015111)
I aim to please.

It really is no trouble.

Even for those who've sadly lost their deposit.

:)

Or deposited their lose:rolleyes::rolleyes::)

garinda 12-09-2012 10:28

Re: The Tories
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jaysay (Post 1015113)
Or deposited their lose:rolleyes::rolleyes::)

Well some people do seem somewhat highly-strung, and easily excited.

That, and poor self-control, means these little accidents can sometimes happen to them.

Bless.

Houseboy 12-09-2012 11:59

Re: The Tories
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by garinda (Post 1015107)
Er...here.



Apparently they don't differentiate on such things as whether you need to acquire professional qualifications, or how much is earned, it's 'soley' down to whether you're in employment, or not.

:rolleyes:

I'm afraid because of your inabilty to grasp, and understand simple logic, I won't be asking you back for a second interview, though I wish you well in your search.

:)

You're beginning to make yourself look foolish by posting the same quote, which does not back up your argument. Unemployment is also categorised on the list I posted. If you wish to be pedantic we could describe it as "employment status" but I'm sure that all but you have understood my meaning.
Simple logic I gather is your forte, then? Perhaps we should start a thread on semantics, but frankly I don't fancy your chances.

garinda 12-09-2012 15:32

Re: The Tories
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Houseboy (Post 1015125)
You're beginning to make yourself look foolish by posting the same quote, which does not back up your argument. Unemployment is also categorised on the list I posted. If you wish to be pedantic we could describe it as "employment status" but I'm sure that all but you have understood my meaning.
Simple logic I gather is your forte, then? Perhaps we should start a thread on semantics, but frankly I don't fancy your chances.

Whoops.

Here comes another little spillage.

Has anyone got a spare tissue they don't want back?

Houseboy 14-09-2012 14:45

Re: The Tories
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by garinda (Post 1015208)
Whoops.

Here comes another little spillage.

Has anyone got a spare tissue they don't want back?

You know Garinda, I'm really getting to like you, you make me laugh. Keep 'em coming, you'll actually make a point one day.

garinda 14-09-2012 14:54

Re: The Tories
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Houseboy (Post 1015623)
You know Garinda, I'm really getting to like you, you make me laugh. Keep 'em coming, you'll actually make a point one day.

Whoopsie.

Another little emission.

Tissue, anyone?

garinda 14-09-2012 14:59

Re: The Tories
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Houseboy (Post 1015623)
You know Garinda, I'm really getting to like you

Oh gawd, not another.

I'm not taking on any more love struck stalkers on at the moment.

You can add your name, but you'll be waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay down my list.

Sorry.

Houseboy 14-09-2012 15:16

Re: The Tories
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by garinda (Post 1015629)
Oh gawd, not another.

I'm not taking on any more love struck stalkers on at the moment.

You can add your name, but you'll be waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay down my list.

Sorry.

You can't help who you fall in love with.

garinda 14-09-2012 15:21

Re: The Tories
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Houseboy (Post 1015641)
You can't help who you fall in love with.

Pur-lease.

They all come out with that line.

Mancie actually said it via his facial tattoo.

0/10 for originality.

jaysay 14-09-2012 17:50

Re: The Tories
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by garinda (Post 1015644)
Pur-lease.

They all come out with that line.

Mancie actually said it via his facial tattoo.

0/10 for originality.

Take it easy on the poor chap Rindi, we know he doesn't bother to read earlier post:rolleyes:

Houseboy 17-09-2012 08:30

Re: The Tories
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jaysay (Post 1015675)
Take it easy on the poor chap Rindi, we know he doesn't bother to read earlier post:rolleyes:

Nice try Jay. Not being drawn on that one though.


All times are GMT. The time now is 14:04.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com