Accrington Web - Common Law

Page 5 of 11

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

Accrington Web (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/index.php)

- General Chat (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f69/)

- - Common Law (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f69/common-law-59748.html)

accyman

09-11-2011 01:45

Re: Common Law

Quote:

Originally Posted by Michael1954 (Post 946208)

Which is why I asked Kenny in the first place. It's all very well for him to try and make his point, but he should also be able to provide alternatives and solutions to ensure that illegal parking does not prevent others, including the emergency services, going about their business.

just take the cars and crush them

no ones collecting revenue that way :D

garinda

09-11-2011 06:51

Re: Common Law

Quote:

Originally Posted by Neil (Post 945760)

So you did not find House of Commons Ltd either just

HOUSE OF COMMS. LIMITED
19 CELIA ROAD
LONDON
N19 5ET

which was incorporated in 1999. It is still looking like the Ltd companies he stated do not exist. I think he has been doing lots of reading and little checking of the facts.

Perhaps the House of Commons has moved to a suburban street, in a not very salubrious part of north London?

garinda

09-11-2011 07:02

Re: Common Law

Quote:

Originally Posted by MargaretR (Post 946177)

Ridicule is not humour

Don't worry Jedi, she doesn't do it all that much.

Usually it's just high days, and Jewish holidays.

Just ignore the ridiculous post, which made a stab at ridiculing you.

;)

garinda

09-11-2011 07:06

Re: Common Law

Quote:

Originally Posted by MargaretR (Post 946193)

Maybe;) - as you sow, so shall you reap:D

Oh goody.

She's learning.

Must have found a conspiracy website, and has been researching the Laws of Common Sense.

:rolleyes:

garinda

09-11-2011 07:12

Re: Common Law

Quote:

Originally Posted by Neil (Post 946209)

Sorry but I don't understand your post, who is being lazy, you or me?

I just can't find these ltd companies you posted as being what you say they are. A couple had a similar name but was not what you said. Another was a credit union owned by LCC which I would expect to be a ltd company.

I've found evidence that both the Royal Family, and our fire service, are in fact registered companies, with limited liability status.

Fire Queen Ltd, Stockport, Cheshire, SK5 7AR - Contact Details | iCheshire

garinda

09-11-2011 07:57

Re: Common Law

Quote:

Originally Posted by jedimaster (Post 946196)

actually no i'm not a russel brand fan (if you had read my post in the favourite comedy decade thread then this would be obvious) as for being malicious, i'm afraid you know me not i merely point out that the idea of a national conspiracy theory pertaining to the unlawful issuance of a parking fine is a tad extreme.

i can also name several classic comedians who have made a living from the ridicule of people (celebrities/races/class etc. or is the stereotyping of characters not a form of ridicule, you broody sirry irriot, why you not risten)

Quote:

Originally Posted by MargaretR (Post 943638)

It is difficult to feel compassion for people who wear illness like a brick on their shoulder and regard it as a licence to dish out insults and ridicule without fear of retribution.

She's probably getting all stressed, still looking for this evidence.

I really should inform her, sometime soon, that her quest will be fruitless.

I've always ridiculed those that ask for it, long before being diagnosed with Parkinson's.

That's Sod's Law.

;):D

Neil	09-11-2011 11:20

Re: Common Law

Quote:

Originally Posted by garinda (Post 946217)

You getting with it now mate, find something with a similar name and say its something else hoping no one will check :D:D

garinda

09-11-2011 11:28

Re: Common Law

Quote:

Originally Posted by Neil (Post 946247)

You getting with it now mate, find something with a similar name and say its something else hoping no one will check :D:D

Er...I have checked.

Both genuine.

Not a lot of people realise H.R.H. is Stockport based.

;)

MargaretR

09-11-2011 13:46

Re: Common Law

Quote:

Originally Posted by garinda (Post 946224)

Perhaps we should all be a little more understanding.

Desperately searching for something you have no chance of finding, can be a very stressful thing to undertake.

I challenged MargaretR the other week, to provide actual evidence, after she posted this, and accused me of using Parkinson's disease as some sort of licence to ridicule others, other than when it's been relevant to a particular subject, as to when I've ever done this.

She's probably getting all stressed, still looking for this evidence.

I really should inform her, sometime soon, that her quest will be fruitless.

I've always ridiculed those that ask for it, long before being diagnosed with Parkinson's.

That's Sod's Law.

;):D

I do have plenty of time on my hands to search your old posts but you flatter yourself by thinking that I would bother to do it.
You aren't worth the effort. I am indifferent to the fact that you choose to trawl mine.
The fact that you have, gives credence to my opinion of you.
This post has been a waste of two minutes of my time too.

garinda

09-11-2011 14:16

Re: Common Law

Quote:

Originally Posted by MargaretR (Post 946266)

Thought so.

Come out with absolute rubbish, and are then unable to come out with any facts to back up what you spout.

Don't know why I'm suprised, as that also applies to 99% of your posts, including the just plain nasty ones.

However, I choose to read your drivel, as it helps me better understand the emotion that's called pity.

If you insist on reading my posts, and commenting, get used to the fact there may be a retort.

If you're too feeble-mnded to cope, please feel free to put me on ignore.

I'd take it as a sign of your guilt, when charged with being pitiful.

Anyhow, back on thread.

Apparently in law, any date before 1189 is officially refered to as time immemorial.

Who'd have thought?

R.I.P.

;)

Balbus

09-11-2011 16:31

Re: Common Law

Little bit out of date. The Prescription Act of 1832 redefined time immemorial as "Time whereof the memory of man runneth not to the contrary".

garinda

09-11-2011 16:59

Re: Common Law

Quote:

Originally Posted by Balbus (Post 946293)

"Time whereof the memory of man runneth not to the contrary".

Is that legally applicable to the time of contrary women, with poor memory, and the verbal runs?

:rolleyes:

kenny

10-11-2011 20:49

Re: Common Law

hiya michael1954, "illegal parking" is a state of mind

garinda

10-11-2011 20:53

Re: Common Law

Quote:

Originally Posted by kenny (Post 946705)

hiya michael1954, "illegal parking" is a state of mind

So, the mindless can park for free?

:rolleyes:

Neil	10-11-2011 21:26

Re: Common Law

Quote:

Originally Posted by garinda (Post 946709)

So, the mindless can park for free?

:rolleyes:

I hope so, I hate paying to park.

What about the lady in the park today that I told only had half a brain, will she only pay half the parking charge? I will tell her, she might be a little less upset with me :D

All times are GMT. The time now is 13:06.

Page 5 of 11

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page