Accrington Web

Accrington Web (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/index.php)
-   General Chat (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f69/)
-   -   Trees??? (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f69/trees-62161.html)

jaysay 21-08-2012 17:37

Re: Trees???
 
All this over a few sodding trees:rolleyes:

Retlaw 21-08-2012 17:50

Re: Trees???
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Houseboy (Post 1009944)
I said "seem to think", my impression not a statement of fact and perhaps you would point out how I was getting personal? I was replying in the main to actual statements made by you (meaning you generically not individually) and I believe I have the right to make myself clear.
I am really not that disagreeable. I think that perhaps we should draw a line under all this and start again. Circular arguments aren't really my thing and I'm pretty sure that there are a lot of things we agree on. I think my posts on other threads show that. This is, of course, not to say I will never argue again.
Suffice to say that nothiing I have said was meant to be personal in a derogatory way but if anyone has taken it to be so please accept my apologies.

As I said. Quick with thi Gob, talks all day and says nowt.

Less 21-08-2012 17:59

Re: Trees???
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jaysay (Post 1009984)
All this over a few sodding trees:rolleyes:

Ah yes, but from little Acorns mighty Oaks do grow.

We might just be able to branch out and really develop a worthwhile thread.

Methinks the guy's bark is worse than his bite.

Have you twigged yet? let's leaf this thread alone.

Surely even this post was worth logging on for?

We, the members should be rooting for a greater contribution from our sapling members.

O.K. I give up my head hurts, someone elses turn.
:)

susie123 21-08-2012 18:23

Re: Trees???
 
Let's not beat about the bush, it's plane to see and elm-entary that out of the ash of this trunk-ated thread wood arise a new and more poplar forum for those who are sycamore ranting.

jaysay 21-08-2012 18:26

Re: Trees???
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by susie123 (Post 1010003)
Let's not beat about the bush, it's plane to see and elm-entary that out of the ash of this trunk-ated thread wood arise a new and more poplar forum for those who are sycamore ranting.

Your just larching about susie:rolleyes:

MargaretR 21-08-2012 18:39

Re: Trees???
 
I won't pine when this thread ends.
...but yew never can tell when that will be
..it could prove poplar

DaveinGermany 21-08-2012 19:24

Re: Trees???
 
Wood you Adam & Eve it ? Budding from his planting a question, the thread has blossomed in to something horticultural & rather high bough at times. I cedar way this is branching out so we don't need to get back to the roots & if we stick with this vine, who knows ? I think we'd be barking to stop now, so just shrub your shoulders & willownly know as we carry on if this will be an evergreen or knot. :)



Some deciduously dubious ones there, but hey, no need to keep it privet or beat around the bush,after all ,we're only larching about. :D

Mancie 21-08-2012 19:46

Re: Trees???
 
Well I'm totally stumped at the moment..but I do beleaf this thread needs to be spruced up.

Michael1954 21-08-2012 20:31

Re: Trees???
 
Time to finish, OAKy?

MargaretR 21-08-2012 20:33

Re: Trees???
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Michael1954 (Post 1010033)
Time to finish, OAKy?

I agree - Too many tree puns ar bouring

mobertol 21-08-2012 20:43

Re: Trees???
 
Why all the hassle recently against new members? I just don't get it...can't see the wood for the trees perhaps...:confused:

davemac 21-08-2012 21:26

Re: Trees???
 
This thread is barking mad

Mancie 21-08-2012 21:32

Re: Trees???
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mobertol (Post 1010037)
Why all the hassle recently against new members? I just don't get it...can't see the wood for the trees perhaps...:confused:

If you feel that way it's Fir enough.
:)

shillelagh 21-08-2012 21:53

Re: Trees???
 
6 Attachment(s)
calf hey res in june ....:D:D:D

Judith Addison 21-08-2012 22:37

Re: Trees???
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Houseboy (Post 1008957)
I recently took the dog for a walk along the old railway lines in Baxenden and, for the first time in a long time, I walked up through the large meadow (commonly known by the Hollins schoolkids as "Killer Hill") next to the football pitches. I was met with the sight of hundreds of plastic things hiding young trees. Now I love trees as much as anybody (probably more than most) but I think some places are better without them. This particular meadow has sweeping views and plenty of space for dogs to run free, not to mention a safe place for women alone to walk the dog. I was frankly sickened by the sight of it.
Does anyone know who is responsible for this act of environmental vandalism? When grown the views will be gone and the whole area will be enclosed and potentially unsafe.
Answers please.

I have just read through the posts in this thread and noted that no answer has yet been given to Houseboy's original question. I have therefore e-mailed the Baxenden councillors to see if they can shed any light on this tree-planting scheme. Seems like this might be a sensible place to start.


All times are GMT. The time now is 19:58.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com