![]() |
Re: morallity and employment
I won't be the one to try and persuade you otherwise.
|
Re: morallity and employment
Quote:
Quote:
I do not KNOW that about plants, it may be that they feel as much as animals do, or perhaps they do not. That's the difference for me. |
Re: morallity and employment
Quote:
|
Re: morallity and employment
Quote:
We do seem to have got lost in the many diverse opinions more of lifestyles than morality and employment. The simple answer I suppose is that if you feel something is morally wrong and you refuse the job you may have to face further consequences such as having your money stopped for refusing work. There are many people within engineering that wouldn't for example work in the armaments industry, that is their moral right, I don't know if it is their legal right though. I have no qualms so far as that is concerned I would build anything from a control panel for a drinks production soft drinks or alcoholic line, to the doomsday machine, so I wouldn't be placed in that dilemma, I wouldn't condemn someone else that took the view that this would be morally wrong for them so long as they didn't try to stop me from working and putting food on the table. :) |
Re: morallity and employment
Quote:
We do know that animals have consciousness and feelings , though. That's what makes the difference for me :) |
Re: morallity and employment
Quote:
The Extrasensory perception of plants - YouTube A lot depends on how broad your view is of 'conciousness'. |
Re: morallity and employment
Quote:
|
Re: morallity and employment
What's to do? didn't the thread go along the way the starter planned?
Was he expecting a big get together of we hate the unemployed and instead got a majority that would rather talk about anything else? It's a difficult subject, but surely, we can discuss 'morallity and employment', no matter how it's spelt? |
Re: morallity and employment
where on this planet, do you see my opening statement as an invitation/encouragement of "lets attack the unemployed"?
as i stated it came directly from a post that one member had made in another thread, and it raised a question, i didnt want to hijack that thread so started a new one. as for the current way the thread has gone, i have no issue at all with thread wanders, any reference i make to them, is a nod to those members who like to use the term when they dont want to answer something, or just use t as an excuse to end a discussion. i have been unemployed, i have had help from the government in raising my 4 children, i also believe strongly in a cradle to the grave system. i Have spent more of the tax payers money, than i have paid in (probably, when you take into consideration benefits,education,health** so why would i want to have a big get together of the unemployed? or was it just another of your classic baiting/trolling? |
Re: morallity and employment
Quote:
I was just giving you that spur to continue what you started. not so much baiting or trolling just wondered why when you started such an interesting thread did you leave it alone? P.S. I in a sentence aught to be a capital. ;) :D |
Re: morallity and employment
:hehetable Watch out for the grammar nazis. No thread is safe
C'Mon lets not start arguing again. Happy thoughts. |
Re: morallity and employment
ought it?;):D
|
Re: morallity and employment
Quote:
What good is that? I don't want to argue, I want the thread kept alive, come on starter give us more thoughts. |
Re: morallity and employment
Quote:
and it was more of a troll, questioning if it hadnt gone they way id hoped, then making up my hidden agenda so there you go, work done for the evening, you can put your feet up now, i bit (well had a little nibble);) |
Re: morallity and employment
Quote:
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 21:05. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com