Accrington Web - How Annoyed Should I be?

Accrington Web (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/index.php)

- General Chat (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f69/)

- - How Annoyed Should I be? (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f69/how-annoyed-should-i-be-67802.html)

Re: How Annoyed Should I be?

Quote:

Originally Posted by accyman (Post 1156468)

Maybe the councilor that came on here to clear his name could have ago at clearing your name as well Less

ya know help the people and all that :)

He is the wrong one, for waste services you need Councillor Paul Cox. Here are his details Councillor details - Paul Cox

Re: How Annoyed Should I be?

i wouldn't say it was a waste service issue but more one of a harassment issue or false accusation without proof issue

less has been accused of a criminal offence / fly tipping without any substantial proof or evidence indicating that he should be the one getting threatened with a £1000 fine

im pretty sure this isnt any councilors fault but one of the morons who keep their jobs whoever wins the election and seem to have more powers than the police themselves or at least not confined to restrictions such as proof and evidence

this is why i suggested contacting a councilor that he is at least on a first name basis with :D:D

Re: How Annoyed Should I be?

You are right but the Councillor is responsible for that section so he should be told whats going on in the same way Ken took the blame for the crem cross

Re: How Annoyed Should I be?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Neil (Post 1156755)

You are right but the Councillor is responsible for that section so he should be told whats going on in the same way Ken took the blame for the crem cross

Whoa there obsequious one.....are you saying that Paul Cox is as much to blame for Less getting his warning letter as Ken Moss is for the crematorium fiasco:-

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ken Moss (Post 1156211)

My point is that it wasn't the best way of having a discussion. Rather than a reasoned debate in private first (it would have ended up in the papers eventually anyway), it was used for maximum political capital instead.

Instead of getting a balanced news report in the local press, it ended up starting a war in the Daily Mail. The Council officers were bombarded with calls from people who said we should be clamping down on Muslim immigration (this had nothing to do with Muslims, who don't use the Crem anyway) to death threats from people who claimed to be regular church goers.

I'm sure some wil find that amusing, but the number of emails also heavily criticising the church was surprising. They wouldn't have had that if they'd not fallen into bed with Peter. I just think that is a shame.

You then get Britcliffe crowing in the papers that HBC have acceded to his 'demands' which to be honest just damages us all (and again the emails bore this out).

The saddest thing of all is that Cllr Judith Addison, also a lay preacher, wrote a magnificent Facebook post looking at things from both sides of the fence.

She was completely ignored by the press.

C'mon Paul..blame the Daily Mail and Britcliffe for the letter that Less got..then again with friends like super moderator and his in the know mates..who needs enemies :rolleyes: