Accrington Web
Page 6 of 16 12345 6 789101112131415 Last »
Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

Accrington Web (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/index.php)
-   Football (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f87/)
-   -   hughes to city (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f87/hughes-to-city-39962.html)

BLACKBURN RAVER 03-06-2008 21:59
Re: hughes to city
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Royboy39 (Post 586751)
OK you've won one........now where does that leave us? :confused:
I still think Big Sam is not the man for Rovers.

well i dont know about you but it leaves me needing my bed....night night ...cheers for the banter ;)

oh and

big sam IS the man ...:D

yerself 04-06-2008 04:37
Re: hughes to city
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Royboy39
OK Smart arse.....thats puts you in the driving seat....what's your take?
Dear Mr. Butty please accept my most humble apologies. I was confusing you for Royboy39.

Royboy39 04-06-2008 08:21
Re: hughes to city
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by yerself (Post 586835)
Dear Mr. Butty please accept my most humble apologies. I was confusing you for Royboy39.
Nice name that...........Gostuff

cashman 04-06-2008 09:03
Re: hughes to city
 
when the inevitable happens big sam is a definate NO NO fer me, yeh he did ok at bolton, but to watch em - crap. i reckon rovers should start n up n coming guy,as hughes was, he'd only mamaged wales, i will probably get shouted down fer this but like i'm bovvered, i would go fer Paul Ince, don't personally like the guy, but hes got the same background as hughsie at man u, n aint done too bad on the bottom rung as hughes.

jaysay 04-06-2008 10:25
Re: hughes to city
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by cashman (Post 586899)
when the inevitable happens big sam is a definate NO NO fer me, yeh he did ok at bolton, but to watch em - crap. i reckon rovers should start n up n coming guy,as hughes was, he'd only mamaged wales, i will probably get shouted down fer this but like i'm bovvered, i would go fer Paul Ince, don't personally like the guy, but hes got the same background as hughsie at man u, n aint done too bad on the bottom rung as hughes.
Well he'd certainly be better than Sam cashy thats for sure, but I think we'll end up with Big Sam only for the reason that he is far better working on a small budget like Hughes has done, than having plenty of cash like he had at the North East nut house

Gayle 04-06-2008 11:22
Re: hughes to city
 
What about Shearer - he wants to get into Managing, could be popular with the fans, seems a nice, stable sort of bloke, etc.

Royboy39 04-06-2008 12:16
Re: hughes to city
 
Mark Hughes has agreed to a three year contract with Man City.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/foot...ty/7431155.stm

shakermaker 04-06-2008 12:22
Re: hughes to city
 
Chuffing nora! Well, all the best to him... seeing as City are a team I look out for.
No, I shan't use the dreaded, somewhat disgusting two words of 'second team'.

jambutty 04-06-2008 12:35
Re: hughes to city
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mancie (Post 586583)
I hear Souness is showing interest in the Rovers job.
The last people Rovers need are Souness or Big Sam.

AccyMad 04-06-2008 12:59
Re: hughes to city
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by cashman (Post 586304)
that sounds like pure envy.:D
Course it is, what we wouldn't give for 1 jack walker type & there's you wishing you could get another - pure greed if you ask me :D

jambutty 04-06-2008 13:07
Re: hughes to city
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stanleymad (Post 586594)
What about Paul Jewell for ya gaffer ?????????????????????:D:D:D
Paul Jewell?

Only if we want Rovers to go down a division.

cashman 04-06-2008 14:56
Re: hughes to city
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gayle (Post 586938)
What about Shearer - he wants to get into Managing, could be popular with the fans, seems a nice, stable sort of bloke, etc.
stick to politics n am dramatics gayle.:D

cashman 04-06-2008 14:59
Re: hughes to city
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by jaysay (Post 586916)
Well he'd certainly be better than Sam cashy thats for sure, but I think we'll end up with Big Sam only for the reason that he is far better working on a small budget like Hughes has done, than having plenty of cash like he had at the North East nut house
well ince aint exactly had big bucks thrown at him n fer me his sides play better footy than bolton did under big sam. plus would cost less fer ince, leaving more dosh fer transfers is my thoughts.;)

Stanleymad 04-06-2008 15:01
Re: hughes to city
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by jambutty (Post 587019)
Paul Jewell?

Only if we want Rovers to go down a division.
:rofl38: ;) hehehee:jimbo:

Gayle 04-06-2008 15:49
Re: hughes to city
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by cashman (Post 587060)
stick to politics n am dramatics gayle.:D
His name has already been mentioned by others far more knowledgeable than I.:p


All times are GMT. The time now is 21:22.
Page 6 of 16 12345 6 789101112131415 Last »
Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com