Re: Sky news players charged bury game
 

Get all of them out, well at least the ones that are still here.

Re: Sky news players charged bury game
 

No I can't remember the club being penalised either.

Re: Sky news players charged bury game
 

Re: Sky news players charged bury game
 

I disagree. Innocent until proven guilty is the best way to go. The club has to support the players until a verdict is made.

Re: Sky news players charged bury game
 

What is or isn't going to happen to the players is way down on my list of priorities at the moment...far more concerned about the possible consequences for the club.

Re: Sky news players charged bury game
 

Suspension involves no guilt or innocence - it is not a punishment. It is avoiding embarrassment to all concerned.

In this case, the fans (home and away) and other players will be suspicious of those involved. Stanley fans will wonder how many times Cavanagh, for example, has been involved in betting against his own team - and they may reflect on events such as own goals that we can recall. It would be far better to suspend those invloved and keep them away from any potential embarrassment.

As I said, that would happen in any other profession. It does NOT assume guilt.

Re: Sky news players charged bury game
 

In any other profession - cops, medicine, teaching - then once accusations like this are made, then suspension follows, pending the outcome of investigation and enquiry. I can't see any difference here. They won't be playing in the next few weeks.


Ahhh.......same thinking

Re: Sky news players charged bury game
 

Suspension is most definitely a punishment for the players. Needless to say, it also puts the club in a more difficult position on the pitch.

The difference with similar everyday circumstances is that it's a football club, not the real world.

Re: Sky news players charged bury game
 

Re: Sky news players charged bury game
 

As Tealeaf says, it is the same in other professions. Would you want your child to be taught by a teacher against whom an allegation has been made, rightly or wrongly? Would you want to be treated by a doctor who has been accused of negligence, rightly or wrongly? If and when any allegations against the teacher or doctor are proved to be unfounded, that is the end of the problem.

Potentially, indeed it does. We have to live with that. We have to do what is right, not what is expedient.

This is very much the real world. It's the world of law, order and justice. Wynonie has a specific worry about the club - and quite right, too. If the players are found guilty and the club is punished, we'll see whether or not it's the real world.

Re: Sky news players charged bury game
 

I would normally agree with you on this but haven't the club set a precedent by not suspending Dunsavin and Grant when they were accused of nightclub thuggery? You can't really have one law for one and one law for another.

Re: Sky news players charged bury game
 

The analogies don't work.
How do the allegations affect you, or indeed any other fan? Apprehension, anxiety over what's to come? What's new?!
Rumour, suspicion from other teams' fans? That's going to happen anyway, with any of our players now the story is out.
The club's name dragged through the mud? Already happening!

Re: Sky news players charged bury game
 

They should be suspended with immediate effect. It would be in their own interest. There is no guilt attached. Disrepute springs to mind, not only the players but more so the Club. We are already the laughing stock, but I dread to think what we will become especially if we continue to play these two.It just shows what these players think of Accrington Stanley, no respect. How many more are involved? But keeping their heads down, maybe we will never know but people will always wonder,and speculate.

Re: Sky news players charged bury game
 

The item was just mentioned on the national BBC radio news.:(

Re: Sky news players charged bury game
 

How can anyone who never played in the game be accused of influencing the outcome??

I haven't read the relevant rules that there meant to have broken but surely if they looked at our squad, looked at there's and thought we were going to lose and were not involved in the game, couldn't they have bet just like you or I would do??