Accrington Web

Accrington Web (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/index.php)
-   Accrington Stanley (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f93/)
-   -   Sky news players charged bury game (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f93/sky-news-players-charged-bury-game-46754.html)

K-P 07-04-2009 12:24

Sky news players charged bury game
 
oh dear :(

Cav , rocky, harris, mangan all charged..

John_Timmins 07-04-2009 12:33

Re: Sky news players charged bury game
 
English FA charge players in betting scandal - The Irish Times - Tue, Apr 07, 2009

Mr Matthew 07-04-2009 12:33

Re: Sky news players charged bury game
 
And Mannix.

Fire them both. Conference standard players anyway.

JEFF 07-04-2009 12:34

Re: Sky news players charged bury game
 
Now on fishy site

wadey 07-04-2009 12:36

Re: Sky news players charged bury game
 
They should have been arrested and charged, never mind "Breach of Rules"

Wynonie Harris 07-04-2009 12:38

Re: Sky news players charged bury game
 
So, IF they're found guilty, presumably, we could get a points deduction?

lancsmatt 07-04-2009 12:40

Re: Sky news players charged bury game
 
Not condoning it or anything, but the amounts seem to differ a bit between Cav and the other four... thousands compared to a fiver on an accumulator? Does that mean he just included Bury amongst his teams to win? Still out of order if so, but far less and very harsh to include him in the same catagory as the other four. Or have I misunderstood?

sparkie 07-04-2009 12:40

Re: Sky news players charged bury game
 
other than Cavs £5 accumulator, where have the others got that kind of money from?

MCR ADIM 07-04-2009 12:46

Re: Sky news players charged bury game
 
this is what coley and eric thought when they heard the news last year
YouTube - Accrington Stanley Exactly! Episode6 pt3 watch from 3.50 onwards, They must be earning quite alot of money to bet like that, but the car park is always full of bmw's and audi's so they aint cheap are they.

K-P 07-04-2009 12:49

Re: Sky news players charged bury game
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by lancsmatt (Post 701641)
Not condoning it or anything, but the amounts seem to differ a bit between Cav and the other four... ?

eeerm from teh FA website

Cavanagh has also been charged with further breaches in
relation to his betting on another Accrington Stanley match in which he
played and on a number of other League Two matches.

JEFF 07-04-2009 13:05

Re: Sky news players charged bury game
 
TheFA.com - Five players charged

Leighton McGivern also mentioned

yerself 07-04-2009 13:06

Re: Sky news players charged bury game
 
Betting

7. A Participant shall not, either directly or indirectly bet, or instruct, permit or enable any person for the Participant’s benefit to bet, on the result, progress or conduct of a Match or Competition.

8. A Participant shall not provide to any other person any information relating to football which the Participant has by virtue of his or her position within the game and which is not publicly available with the intention that it be used by the other person for or in relation to betting.

9. A Participant shall not breach Rule E7 or 8 above where the Participant can prove that:

1. the bet was on authorised and registered football pools; or
2. the bet was on a Match or Competition in which the Participant was not participating or had no influence, either direct or indirect.

K-P 07-04-2009 13:14

Re: Sky news players charged bury game
 
The club are taking the innocent until proven guilty line and to be fair thats all they can do.. I ahve some strong thoughts on this as I am sure we all have... but until its done and dusted and proven then I am keeping shtum ..

Jimbo T Hornblower 07-04-2009 13:18

Re: Sky news players charged bury game
 
What an embarassing mess - proverbial has hit the fan me thinks... :(

Jimbo T :horn8:blower

MCR ADIM 07-04-2009 13:26

Re: Sky news players charged bury game
 
Bury | BFC Scores, News, Transfers, Fixtures, Message Board
what Bury fans think you might have to sign up but just use a temporary email address i did!

yerself 07-04-2009 13:46

Re: Sky news players charged bury game
 
http://www.independent.co.uk/multime...ng_162325t.jpg
Former Accrington Stanley player Peter Cavanagh is one of the players who have been charged

Does The Independent know something? Look at the caption on the pic.

Players charged over gambling - News & Comment, Football - The Independent

madkev 07-04-2009 13:54

Re: Sky news players charged bury game
 
i hope to see none of the involved in a red shirt ever again if guilty of this.Pure greed,it shows to me how much they think of the supporters who pay to see them week in week out

cashman 07-04-2009 13:55

Re: Sky news players charged bury game
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Wynonie Harris (Post 701638)
So, IF they're found guilty, presumably, we could get a points deduction?

were Sheff Wednesday deducted points when Swann,Kay,Layne, were found guilty of match fixing? memory's not great but thought they were banned fer life end of? that charge was even more serious to me.:( or is it not the same fer top level players?:rolleyes:

shakermaker 07-04-2009 14:02

Re: Sky news players charged bury game
 
With regards to our current players, I just pray that this is one huge misunderstanding.

Mr Matthew 07-04-2009 14:02

Re: Sky news players charged bury game
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Wynonie Harris (Post 701638)
So, IF they're found guilty, presumably, we could get a points deduction?

Very much doubt, it'll go as far as that. The clubs not to blame on this occassion. The individuals are.

JEFF 07-04-2009 14:05

Re: Sky news players charged bury game
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by cashman (Post 701670)
were Sheff Wednesday deducted points when Swann,Kay,Layne, were found guilty of match fixing? memory's not great but thought they were banned fer life end of? that charge was even more serious to me.:( or is it not the same fer top level players?:rolleyes:

They got jailed.

1964 British betting scandal - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

cashman 07-04-2009 14:09

Re: Sky news players charged bury game
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by JEFF (Post 701674)

yeh am aware of that jeff, but the football ban was fer life, later reduced i think. can't remember the club being penalised?

Bagpuss 07-04-2009 14:14

Re: Sky news players charged bury game
 
Anyone feel like asking for a refund on their season tickets?

cashman 07-04-2009 14:16

Re: Sky news players charged bury game
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Bagpuss (Post 701679)
Anyone feel like asking for a refund on their season tickets?

not this kid.:) its que sera.

yerself 07-04-2009 14:26

Re: Sky news players charged bury game
 
Some interesting reading on devachat.

ukcowboy 07-04-2009 14:58

Re: Sky news players charged bury game
 
Two words :- OH DEAR

K.S.H 07-04-2009 15:00

Re: Sky news players charged bury game
 
5 words - OH Store High In Transit

ukcowboy 07-04-2009 15:04

Re: Sky news players charged bury game
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by k.s.h (Post 701695)
5 words - oh store high in transit

lol :)

Bagpuss 07-04-2009 15:13

Re: Sky news players charged bury game
 
Can't help but wonder how many more games and if any other players where involved, I would think it's unusual to get caught the first time.

shakermaker 07-04-2009 15:17

Re: Sky news players charged bury game
 
Must say, neither Rocky or Cav were players I'd have guessed to be involved with it all.

theresonlyoneaccy 07-04-2009 15:17

Re: Sky news players charged bury game
 
Get all of them out, well at least the ones that are still here.

JEFF 07-04-2009 15:27

Re: Sky news players charged bury game
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by cashman (Post 701676)
yeh am aware of that jeff, but the football ban was fer life, later reduced i think. can't remember the club being penalised?

No I can't remember the club being penalised either.

Revived Red 07-04-2009 15:30

Re: Sky news players charged bury game
 
Surely the club must take some immediate action. I would have thought that the players named should be suspended by the club until the outcome is known. That would happen in any other walk of life where a serious allegation is made.

shakermaker 07-04-2009 15:36

Re: Sky news players charged bury game
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Revived Red (Post 701710)
Surely the club must take some immediate action. I would have thought that the players named should be suspended by the club until the outcome is known. That would happen in any other walk of life where a serious allegation is made.

I disagree. Innocent until proven guilty is the best way to go. The club has to support the players until a verdict is made.

Wynonie Harris 07-04-2009 15:42

Re: Sky news players charged bury game
 
What is or isn't going to happen to the players is way down on my list of priorities at the moment...far more concerned about the possible consequences for the club.

Revived Red 07-04-2009 15:43

Re: Sky news players charged bury game
 
Suspension involves no guilt or innocence - it is not a punishment. It is avoiding embarrassment to all concerned.

In this case, the fans (home and away) and other players will be suspicious of those involved. Stanley fans will wonder how many times Cavanagh, for example, has been involved in betting against his own team - and they may reflect on events such as own goals that we can recall. It would be far better to suspend those invloved and keep them away from any potential embarrassment.

As I said, that would happen in any other profession. It does NOT assume guilt.

Tealeaf 07-04-2009 15:44

Re: Sky news players charged bury game
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by shakermaker (Post 701711)
I disagree. Innocent until proven guilty is the best way to go. The club has to support the players until a verdict is made.

In any other profession - cops, medicine, teaching - then once accusations like this are made, then suspension follows, pending the outcome of investigation and enquiry. I can't see any difference here. They won't be playing in the next few weeks.


Ahhh.......same thinking

shakermaker 07-04-2009 15:46

Re: Sky news players charged bury game
 
Suspension is most definitely a punishment for the players. Needless to say, it also puts the club in a more difficult position on the pitch.

The difference with similar everyday circumstances is that it's a football club, not the real world.

MCR ADIM 07-04-2009 15:59

Re: Sky news players charged bury game
 
talksport 1089MW they have a phone in on the betting scandal

Revived Red 07-04-2009 16:02

Re: Sky news players charged bury game
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by shakermaker (Post 701716)
Suspension is most definitely a punishment for the players.

As Tealeaf says, it is the same in other professions. Would you want your child to be taught by a teacher against whom an allegation has been made, rightly or wrongly? Would you want to be treated by a doctor who has been accused of negligence, rightly or wrongly? If and when any allegations against the teacher or doctor are proved to be unfounded, that is the end of the problem.

Quote:

Originally Posted by shakermaker (Post 701716)
Needless to say, it also puts the club in a more difficult position on the pitch.

Potentially, indeed it does. We have to live with that. We have to do what is right, not what is expedient.

Quote:

Originally Posted by shakermaker (Post 701716)
The difference with similar everyday circumstances is that it's a football club, not the real world.

This is very much the real world. It's the world of law, order and justice. Wynonie has a specific worry about the club - and quite right, too. If the players are found guilty and the club is punished, we'll see whether or not it's the real world.

yerself 07-04-2009 16:08

Re: Sky news players charged bury game
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Revived Red
Surely the club must take some immediate action. I would have thought that the players named should be suspended by the club until the outcome is known. That would happen in any other walk of life where a serious allegation is made.

I would normally agree with you on this but haven't the club set a precedent by not suspending Dunsavin and Grant when they were accused of nightclub thuggery? You can't really have one law for one and one law for another.

shakermaker 07-04-2009 16:14

Re: Sky news players charged bury game
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Revived Red (Post 701719)
As Tealeaf says, it is the same in other professions. Would you want your child to be taught by a teacher against whom an allegation has been made, rightly or wrongly? Would you want to be treated by a doctor who has been accused of negligence, rightly or wrongly? If and when any allegations against the teacher or doctor are proved to be unfounded, that is the end of the problem.

The analogies don't work.
How do the allegations affect you, or indeed any other fan? Apprehension, anxiety over what's to come? What's new?!
Rumour, suspicion from other teams' fans? That's going to happen anyway, with any of our players now the story is out.
The club's name dragged through the mud? Already happening!

Tommy McQueen 07-04-2009 16:15

Re: Sky news players charged bury game
 
They should be suspended with immediate effect. It would be in their own interest. There is no guilt attached. Disrepute springs to mind, not only the players but more so the Club. We are already the laughing stock, but I dread to think what we will become especially if we continue to play these two.It just shows what these players think of Accrington Stanley, no respect. How many more are involved? But keeping their heads down, maybe we will never know but people will always wonder,and speculate.

garinda 07-04-2009 16:18

Re: Sky news players charged bury game
 
The item was just mentioned on the national BBC radio news.:(

petegibbons 07-04-2009 16:23

Re: Sky news players charged bury game
 
How can anyone who never played in the game be accused of influencing the outcome??

I haven't read the relevant rules that there meant to have broken but surely if they looked at our squad, looked at there's and thought we were going to lose and were not involved in the game, couldn't they have bet just like you or I would do??

MCR ADIM 07-04-2009 16:23

Re: Sky news players charged bury game
 
I do not think we can suspend the players for rest of the season! Like someone else said when grant and bavs who go on trail in June/July i think got charged with it! The club did not do anything until they have been proven guilty or not guilty and thats the way to go! But this is from the bury forum
Know where you're coming from shakersince92, except it was common knowledge in the WEEK before the game. Hence the change of Ref, and the fact that all betting on the game was stopped a few days earlier.

The reason given at the time was they thought some of the AS were going to be at a stag do and so they were not likely to be very interested (I thought the stag do was to be after the game and a number of AS players were going to pull out causing them to field a weakened side, BEFORE the Bookies/FA got wind of it)

Their lack of interest/non attendance plus Bury's recent good away form (at the time) and the biggest point which everyone is overlooking, is that the Bookies had actually got their initial odds wrong! caused the betting interest in the game

The scale of the betting alerted the bookies who then alerted the FA, who I feel pretty sure would have spoken to both AS and Bury prior to the game and before they changed the Ref. There are reports that the FA had people at the ground to monitor proceedings and report back, presumably done with the full co-operation of AS in the main, but also with Bury.

Its quite feasible the bookies, in particular, had an idea who was behind the betting and reported it back to the FA. Looking at the way the charges are framed and that neither AS or Bury as clubs (other as than their employers) are mentioned points to the fact it is the players who the FA are really interested in.

In the 60s betting scandal (albeit slightly different) neither Sheff Wed nor Ipswich Town were in any way reprimanded

I dont think there is any need to read any more into the 'no comment' statements by AS or us, the matter is still 'sub judice' and as such any comment could be perceived to have a detrimental affect (either way) on the final outcome and any punishments should there be any

jaysay 07-04-2009 16:31

Re: Sky news players charged bury game
 
Footballers know the rules on gambling, I actually think they are not even allowed to play the pools let alone at the bookies, much in the same way that jockey's aren't allowed to bet on houses.

The thing that annoys me is the fact that people like you lads on here pay your hard earned money to watch these cheats play for Stanley and try there best, not sell you down the river like that, Only hope you give um some stick whenever possible, as I'm sure you will:(

Revived Red 07-04-2009 16:35

Re: Sky news players charged bury game
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by shakermaker (Post 701726)
The analogies don't work.
How do the allegations affect you, or indeed any other fan? Apprehension, anxiety over what's to come?

No, certainly not. Apprehension, anxiety of what's been and gone. They affect me, and indeed any other fan, because we wonder if some members of the team that we are watching have (a) flouted clear laws; and (b) bet against their own team. There is a (c) which I won't state but which should be obvious.

Revived Red 07-04-2009 16:38

Re: Sky news players charged bury game
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by yerself (Post 701723)
I would normally agree with you on this but haven't the club set a precedent by not suspending Dunsavin and Grant when they were accused of nightclub thuggery? You can't really have one law for one and one law for another.

The two that you name have not been accused of breaking the laws of their own profession. If they are found to be guilty, it would reflect on them personally but it would not necessarily bring their profession into disrepute.

Tealeaf 07-04-2009 16:42

Re: Sky news players charged bury game
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by MCR ADIM (Post 701736)
I

I dont think there is any need to read any more into the 'no comment' statements by AS or us, the matter is still 'sub judice' and as such any comment could be perceived to have a detrimental affect (either way) on the final outcome and any punishments should there be any

There is nothing currently 'sub-judice' whatsoever. The FA has no legal standing as a Court of Law and as such we are free to say what we like, within the usual boundaries. That situation, will of course, change should the police and subsequently the CPS decide to bring charges before a court. Only then could sub-judice be deemed to apply.

maccawozzagod 07-04-2009 16:43

Re: Sky news players charged bury game
 
probably fortunately both players are out of contract shortly.

There obviously HAS been a bet placed because the FA have taken nearly 12 months to give out those financial statements.

bye-bye.

MCR ADIM 07-04-2009 16:52

Re: Sky news players charged bury game
 
Wonder how Coley feels about his own players who he has brought in and trusted that they will play to the best of there ability feels now the FA have charged two of our players with it! Will Cav and Rocky be in the squad on Saturday if they arnt who will replace them? Bell, Murdock, Leam if fit, Murphy if fit!

cashman 07-04-2009 16:54

Re: Sky news players charged bury game
 
i would hope they are not in any squads until this matter is resolved.

wadey 07-04-2009 16:58

Re: Sky news players charged bury game
 
Wasn't it the bookies who tipped off the FA following a lot of suspicious activity in the Liverpool area betting shops? I think so

MCR ADIM 07-04-2009 17:01

Re: Sky news players charged bury game
 
Yes it was as someone from the bury forum pointed out! What get's me though is how they found out it was them!

MCR ADIM 07-04-2009 17:04

Re: Sky news players charged bury game
 
A bury fan just said

Just seen Eric Whalley on SSN, and he's stated if any AS player found guilty they will immediately be dismissed. So got it on now waiting for it to come on.

Willie Miller 07-04-2009 17:05

Re: Sky news players charged bury game
 
Its not hard..... You get bank statements & you get betting slips.....

£4k drawn out of D Mannix account night before Bury game. £4k in Mannix local bookies on Bury win v Acc

Mannix can't explain to the satisfaction of the FA, where he spent his 4k.....

MCR ADIM 07-04-2009 17:37

Re: Sky news players charged bury game
 
10pages of what dale think
RochdaleAFC.com - Rochdale

Grimps 07-04-2009 18:01

Re: Sky news players charged bury game
 
thick dumb players you would have got away if you would have saved up money over a few weeks than put it on in different places and not doing it in person you thick ~~~~~ so all should never play 4 the club again time for cav rocky to go

caretaker 07-04-2009 18:02

Re: Sky news players charged bury game
 
This is not good.

Thin Monkey 07-04-2009 18:17

Re: Sky news players charged bury game
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Tealeaf (Post 701753)
There is nothing currently 'sub-judice' whatsoever. The FA has no legal standing as a Court of Law and as such we are free to say what we like, within the usual boundaries. That situation, will of course, change should the police and subsequently the CPS decide to bring charges before a court. Only then could sub-judice be deemed to apply.

The matter is still sub-judice as far as the disciplinary process, to which ASFC as an FA member club, must adhere. Basic employment law requires of any employer that it does not pre-judge the outcome of a disciplinary processs, no matter how damning the prima facie case may be.

SamF 07-04-2009 18:22

Re: Sky news players charged bury game
 
How stupid do you have to be to get caught...

3rd.Div.North 07-04-2009 18:34

Re: Sky news players charged bury game
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by theresonlyoneaccy (Post 701708)
Get all of them out, well at least the ones that are still here.

If found guilty all the players concerned should be banned from playing professional football for the remainder of their playing careers.

shillelagh 07-04-2009 18:51

Re: Sky news players charged bury game
 
Just listened to Eric Whalleys interview on look northwest ..

BBC SPORT | Football | League Two | Five charged with betting on game

Bagpuss 07-04-2009 19:03

Re: Sky news players charged bury game
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by yerself (Post 701723)
I would normally agree with you on this but haven't the club set a precedent by not suspending Dunsavin and Grant when they were accused of nightclub thuggery? You can't really have one law for one and one law for another.

This is totally different, one is shutting up a big mouthed manc the other is cheating, their team mates, their club and most of all their fans. I haven't checked but could this result have influenced promotion, play offs or relegation, are we likely to be sued if any are found guilty?

MCR ADIM 07-04-2009 19:13

Re: Sky news players charged bury game
 
Sued on what basis? The only game they have been charged on is the bury game and they won! So why would bury sue?

maccawozzagod 07-04-2009 19:16

Re: Sky news players charged bury game
 
i think the point is whether the outcome of the Bury match meant that another team was denied promotion or relegated, thus opening the floodgates for a Sheff Utd type lawsuit - albeit not for £30m!

yerself 07-04-2009 19:37

Re: Sky news players charged bury game
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by SamF
How stupid do you have to be to get caught...

Just look where they all come from.;);)

Haggis316 07-04-2009 19:58

Re: Sky news players charged bury game
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by cashman (Post 701676)
yeh am aware of that jeff, but the football ban was fer life, later reduced i think. can't remember the club being penalised?

I saw one of Tony Kay's "come back" games for Northern All Stars v Skem. He came from Attercliffe area of Sheffield ie local to Don Valley stadium

When his ban was finally lifted he was a shadow of his former self as a player.

Bronco Layne and Swan returned to Wednesday and Swan played about 20 games for Wednesday after the ban was lifted. Swan then went to Bury scoring his first Football League goal on his debut.

Bagpuss 07-04-2009 20:00

Re: Sky news players charged bury game
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by maccawozzagod (Post 701828)
i think the point is whether the outcome of the Bury match meant that another team was denied promotion or relegated, thus opening the floodgates for a Sheff Utd type lawsuit - albeit not for £30m!

That's exactly what I was thinking.:(

MCR ADIM 07-04-2009 20:21

Re: Sky news players charged bury game
 
Next years ground sponsors are going to ladbrokes :tongueout

Grimps 07-04-2009 20:27

Re: Sky news players charged bury game
 
well look at games this year just ONE BRADFORD CITY LOL

wadey 07-04-2009 20:35

Re: Sky news players charged bury game
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by SamF (Post 701812)
How stupid do you have to be to get caught...

True but of course a lot of them get their mates to place the bets when fixing matches, are the fans entitled to their money and travelling expenses back?

K-P 07-04-2009 20:41

Re: Sky news players charged bury game
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mcr adim (Post 701870)
next years ground sponsors are going to ladbrokes :tongueout

:) :) :)

Redash 07-04-2009 20:48

Re: Sky news players charged bury game
 
I am absolutely gutted by this. Players from my team, betting against my team. The FA would not have released the names if they was any doubt of their guilt ( they would leave themselves open to all sorts of legal isues). I’m not bothered if it was £5 £50 or £500,000, the point is, they gambled on my team losing.
Now I think back how often has this betting against Stanley, by Stanley players, been going on.
Cavanagh is often romping forward and leaving the defence vulnerable on the counter attack, like last Saturday against Lincoln Phil had to move out to the right to cover for Cavanagh, leaving a massive hole in the centre for the Lincoln players to exploit. How many times has this happened? As the club captain he should set and lead by example. (I’m not saying the Lincoln match was dodgy, I’m just citing an example that will be fresh in the minds of others)
Williams and Harris, how many needless penalties, free kicks, and sending offs have they been involved with.
Was Mannix useless on purpose? Did Mangan keep running to the wing so he wouldn’t be in a scoring position?
I hope the FA ban them all from football stadiums for life. Never to play, never to manage and never to watch.

JEFF 07-04-2009 20:56

Re: Sky news players charged bury game
 
Mangan played for Forest Green tonight

MCR ADIM 07-04-2009 20:57

Re: Sky news players charged bury game
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Redash (Post 701894)
As the club captain he should set and lead by example.

He is leading by example he decide to bet against the club on £5 and some of the other players followed his example by betting money :D joke.
On a more serious note! On Saturday will he be in the squad? Will he be club captain or will Phill Edwards be given it or another team member? The money they won and they must of won a fair bit with them betting 4k, 3.5k, 2k and 1k and whatever Cav won. They should donated it to the club or a chairty of the club's choice!

fc:stanley 07-04-2009 21:05

Re: Sky news players charged bury game
 
Their not guilty until proven! Could of been any Peter Cavanagh, theirs loads in this world........ :rolleyes: like this one. Google Image Result for http://www.priory.lancs.ac.uk/gifs/peter.jpg

:cool:

Oggy 07-04-2009 21:08

Re: Sky news players charged bury game
 
Just watched Eric's statement BBC SPORT | Football | League Two | Five charged with betting on game

Surely the club had an internal enquiry?

Tinpot to the end.

neilhaj 07-04-2009 21:25

Re: Sky news players charged bury game
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Redash (Post 701894)
I am absolutely gutted by this. Players from my team, betting against my team. The FA would not have released the names if they was any doubt of their guilt ( they would leave themselves open to all sorts of legal isues). I’m not bothered if it was £5 £50 or £500,000, the point is, they gambled on my team losing.
Now I think back how often has this betting against Stanley, by Stanley players, been going on.
Cavanagh is often romping forward and leaving the defence vulnerable on the counter attack, like last Saturday against Lincoln Phil had to move out to the right to cover for Cavanagh, leaving a massive hole in the centre for the Lincoln players to exploit. How many times has this happened? As the club captain he should set and lead by example. (I’m not saying the Lincoln match was dodgy, I’m just citing an example that will be fresh in the minds of others)
Williams and Harris, how many needless penalties, free kicks, and sending offs have they been involved with.
Was Mannix useless on purpose? Did Mangan keep running to the wing so he wouldn’t be in a scoring position?
I hope the FA ban them all from football stadiums for life. Never to play, never to manage and never to watch.

I've kept quiet all day till i've calmed down which isn't happening until i get a few things off my chest. I'm with redash on this btw. how long has this been going on? how does everyone feel paying into games knowing that stanley aren't going to win and the players have aledgedly already decided the outcome of the game? The biggest thing that is bugging me is that these will not be the only players to have had bet, they just will not be able to prove the rest!

yonmon 07-04-2009 21:25

Re: Sky news players charged bury game
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Tommy McQueen (Post 701727)
They should be suspended with immediate effect. It would be in their own interest. There is no guilt attached. Disrepute springs to mind, not only the players but more so the Club. We are already the laughing stock, but I dread to think what we will become especially if we continue to play these two.It just shows what these players think of Accrington Stanley, no respect. How many more are involved? But keeping their heads down, maybe we will never know but people will always wonder,and speculate.

Couldn't agree with you more T. Mc...I've been trying to imagine the reaction of both Grimsby and Stanley fans if Peter Cavanagh and Robert ('Rocky') Williams are seen 'warming up', let alone leading 'the Red's' out as Captain and Senior Professional at Grimsby on Saturday afternoon !!...Whether they are guilty or innocent of any charges levelled at them, they should be protected from the abuse which is likely to be hurled in their direction....AND..
I shudder to think of the level of hatred and Bile which will be aimed at Mannix and Harris if they dare to show their faces at the FES next Monday !!.
So as you rightly say all four of these 'Professionals',
as the PFA would have them called, should be withdrawn from Football of any sort until the matter is resolved.
Perhaps the PFA in it's wisdom should insist on this !.
I feel a real sadness, and my Spring Optimism has evaporated completely,knowing that our Club has already been damaged to a level from which any recovery is going to take a long time and great effort.

WHAT ME WORRY ?.....At this moment in time ....
I CERTAINLY DO !!!!...but I can still restate MY support for'the club that wouldn't die'....
'ON STANLEY.....ON !!!'

Stanleymad 07-04-2009 21:29

Re: Sky news players charged bury game
 
Posted via Mobile Device. To think i sat there with some of them on that bury match grr stupid guys! Did they think they wouldnt get found out??? Gee times must of been 'aard for them to be so silly abusing their careers!!! Its very disappointing more so from the captain.

Tin Monkey 07-04-2009 21:32

Re: Sky news players charged bury game
 
I think the most surprising thing to come out of all this, is that bookies were taking bets on Bury winning that game. Every man and his dog knew we'd lose.

Stanleymad 07-04-2009 21:33

Re: Sky news players charged bury game
 
Posted via Mobile Device. Have to agree with neil, tommy & yonmon comments it does disgrace the badge crest.

Stanleymad 07-04-2009 21:35

Re: Sky news players charged bury game
 
Posted via Mobile Device. Lol TM i was quite surprised myself surely a dead cert has poor odds??

MCR ADIM 07-04-2009 21:35

Re: Sky news players charged bury game
 
In reply to yonmon's post
When we play chester, will Mannix be playing as since the incident where he was in hospital he has told he can leave the club but he has been playing a couple of games! and Harris is in hospital with meningitis.

Revived Red 07-04-2009 21:47

Re: Sky news players charged bury game
 
I have read somewhere today that Stanley players were at a stag party on the night before the Bury match. Is that true?

If it is true, can it be right that players are allowed to attend such an event on the night before a match?

Oldgobbin 07-04-2009 21:49

Re: Sky news players charged bury game
 
I have to say I agree wholeheartedly with Yonmon. I feel that to include either of these two players in the team before the whole business is resolved would be an enormous gaffe on the club’s part. “Innocent until proven guilty” is all very well, but in any other profession they would be suspended on full pay pending the results of the enquiry.

This in no way prejudices their position and is not an assumption of guilt but it does show the seriousness with which the club views the matter, as well as protecting the players from the inevitable abuse that they will suffer from fans of Stanley and opposition alike.

If they are later found guilty, then let them be suspended for life and, as far as the two are concerned who actually played in the game, then maybe criminal charges will be brought against them, as they were against Swan, Kay and Layne all those years ago – if this results in a similar jail sentence, then so be it.

As far as I am concerned, I just feel a tremendous sense of betrayal, especially from the club captain, who stands accused of betraying my beloved football club for 30 pieces (sorry- £5 worth) of silver.

If he turns out to be innocent, then I apologise but until the truth is known, I would prefer not to see him or his full-back partner in a Stanley shirt.

Bagpuss 07-04-2009 21:51

Re: Sky news players charged bury game
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by yonmon (Post 701917)
they should be protected from the abuse which is likely to be hurled in their direction

Why the hell should they be protected, it's a disgrace.:mad:

afrikaaner 07-04-2009 21:55

Re: Sky news players charged bury game
 
Said i'd never post on this forum again but having read and listened to some of the stuff surrounding this betting scandal it makes you wonder.If minds are cast back to certain games,bradford home to name but one,how can we lead 2-0 for 60 or 70 mins be so far on top and then suddenly wham inside of 10 or 12 mins we are 3-2 down ?.kind of makes you start to think a little longer on how it could happen,and thats not the only time we've dominated a game and in some cases lost it in the diing seconds to a stupid defensive blunder.Before certain people jump down my throat just take a while to think about where i'm coming from,Accy are deep in my heart and the last thing they need right now is all this hanging over the club like a dark cloud.If the worst case scenario came into it and the league decided to dock points,(sincerely hope not) and they could depending on what the outcome is then the last few weeks of grafting some hard fought results will all be in vane.I sincerely hope it sorts itself out and the good name of ACCRINGTON STANLEY remains a name to be reckoned with in the world of professional fooball.
THESE ARE MY THOUGHTS AND MINE ALONE.:confused::o

K-P 07-04-2009 22:02

Re: Sky news players charged bury game
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by afrikaaner (Post 701931)
If the worst case scenario came into it and the league decided to dock points,(sincerely hope not) and they could depending on what the outcome is

No they cant.. dont know where you get that from mate but the club is not in danger of losing points.. no matter what the outcome is. thank goodness :) I was always under the impression that the club would be in trouble for all this.. I was very happy to find out I am wrong and the club will not suffer through any penalties or anything by the league.

John_Timmins 07-04-2009 22:12

Re: Sky news players charged bury game
 
Cav and Rockie should be suspended now until the hearing

Anyone found guilty sacked on the spot...

No other options surely???

wadey 07-04-2009 22:14

Re: Sky news players charged bury game
 
This is just the tip of the iceberg it's only since computerised betting that the bookies have been able to spot this scam, if six players send ten mates each into betting shops throughout the country it's very hard to spot. Their mobile phone records would make very interesting reading, whatever the outcome it's a kick in the teeth for the fans who turn up week in, week out in all weathers. I wouldn't watch a football match if you paid me but I feel so sorry and angry for the supporters

yonmon 07-04-2009 22:16

Re: Sky news players charged bury game
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by MCR ADIM (Post 701924)
In reply to yonmon's post
When we play chester, will Mannix be playing as since the incident where he was in hospital he has told he can leave the club but he has been playing a couple of games! and Harris is in hospital with meningitis.

Thanks for the info !...but did you get my drift ?.
( And as more and more 'truths' unfold, I don't feel one bit better !!)...

Stanleymad 07-04-2009 22:18

Re: Sky news players charged bury game
 
Posted via Mobile Device. Agree with ya there timmins that should be suspended pending further investigation has been dealt with, as any employee would have to adhere to & proven guilty final red card from the club, spot on.

MikeA 07-04-2009 22:19

Re: Sky news players charged bury game
 
I've just reread the BBC report of the Bury match. It ends with 'substitute Leighton McGivern scuffed a golden opportunity late on'.

Stanleymad 07-04-2009 22:22

Re: Sky news players charged bury game
 
Posted via Mobile Device. Mind u im sure the fa will deal with them appropiately that it may be out of the clubs hands anyway.

Mr Matthew 07-04-2009 22:25

Re: Sky news players charged bury game
 
I don't doubt for 1 second that the guys are guilty, and there's no smoke without fire.

But I was on a stag do that weekend and remember the odds being pretty amazing for Bury to win.

I would never bet on Stanley losing, but was very very tempted.

Bury were massively overpriced. Any idiot could have seen that.

cashman 07-04-2009 22:27

Re: Sky news players charged bury game
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by John_Timmins (Post 701939)
Cav and Rockie should be suspended now until the hearing

Anyone found guilty sacked on the spot...

No other options surely???

spot on john, gives me no pleasure to say it but it should be no other way.:(

mab 07-04-2009 22:27

Re: Sky news players charged bury game
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Redash (Post 701894)
I am absolutely gutted by this. Players from my team, betting against my team. The FA would not have released the names if they was any doubt of their guilt ( they would leave themselves open to all sorts of legal isues). I’m not bothered if it was £5 £50 or £500,000, the point is, they gambled on my team losing.
Now I think back how often has this betting against Stanley, by Stanley players, been going on.
Cavanagh is often romping forward and leaving the defence vulnerable on the counter attack, like last Saturday against Lincoln Phil had to move out to the right to cover for Cavanagh, leaving a massive hole in the centre for the Lincoln players to exploit. How many times has this happened? As the club captain he should set and lead by example. (I’m not saying the Lincoln match was dodgy, I’m just citing an example that will be fresh in the minds of others)
Williams and Harris, how many needless penalties, free kicks, and sending offs have they been involved with.
Was Mannix useless on purpose? Did Mangan keep running to the wing so he wouldn’t be in a scoring position?
I hope the FA ban them all from football stadiums for life. Never to play, never to manage and never to watch.

:) Totally agree with you Redash,looking back at saturdays game there first goal came from the right were cav was surpost to be!!bang goal .there 2nd goal came from a pass give away from rocky!! bang goal.. these two if guilty should be shown the DOOR and never be alloud to step foot any where near our club;completly gutted by this:( should be dropped suspended,


All times are GMT. The time now is 22:24.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com