![]() |
Re: Bits & Bobs
Quote:
What about the new fans we’re trying to attract giving shirts away etc ? Do you think they will be happy not at least giving it a go at some point ? I repeat it’s a balancing issue but at the moment there’s no fulcrum. Everything getting plugged into ground etc nothing into the squad. |
Re: Bits & Bobs
Quote:
If we did 'ejaculate' as you put it, all our money on players in the hope of surviving league 2, then it was a gamble that paid-off. 'Relegation a vanity issue'. How so? If, God forbid, we got relegated this season, those 'Johnny-come-lately' fans would disappear faster than a 1st class passenger on the Titanic. If we can survive we may well still be playing Sunderland next year, together with possibly Bolton & Rotherham from the Championship & neighbours Bury from League 2. All these teams would bring large away support due to their proximity. ditto Lincoln, who's fans will be on cloud nine if they reach League 1. Make no mistake, relegation would be a disaster for us. Ground improvements aside, I'm sure that Andy Holt & John Coleman will do whatever is necessary to avoid that outcome. |
Re: Bits & Bobs
Quote:
|
Re: Bits & Bobs
Quote:
|
Re: Bits & Bobs
Quote:
|
Re: Bits & Bobs
Regarding off the pitch activities, we still have the 4th smallest crowds in the entire Football League. I suspect that our annual turnover falls in line with that. For all the work that has gone on, we still have a tiny ground and a tiny turnover. Every club bar Macclesfield, Morecambe and I think FGR (a village) is kicking our arse with its turnover, we simply HAVE to get the club to a level where we sit comfortably mid table in those rankings.
The shirt giveaways, happy hours etc are all great, but shouldve been done 10 years ago. We didnt, because the club was on its arse financially as the little we had went on the Jay Harris's of this world. As a result of neglecting the facilities and the fans we have the 4th lowest crowds of the 92. Yes, there is a balancing act but AH DID increase the budget, he DID give Coley a chunk of cup run money. We've aldo paid transfer fees in the last 2/3 years and have signed players that their clubs would rather keep - Maxted and Beckles come to mind. We need to accept what we are, and we are a small club punching above our weight. Way above in fact. Ive no doubt that, provided we keep on with the good work off pitch, in 5 years time we'll have twice as many home fans. I'm prepared to wait ... |
Re: Bits & Bobs
Quote:
|
Re: Bits & Bobs
Perhaps it's time to put things into perspective regarding our continued low home attendance.
On the 30th January AFC Bournemouth beat Chelsea 4-0 at the Vitality Stadium. Official attendance - only 10,227. Of this, 1,500 were away fans, so the home crowd was actually 8,727. As the population of Bournemouth is 187,500 - 4.6% of the population attended. This is a club enjoying their 4th season at the top level of the game, playing against the cream of English football. Four days before, we entertained Derby County in the FA Cup - attendance was 5397, of which home fans numbered 2738. The population of Accrington is 35,456, so 7.7% of our population turned out. In our Conference winning season, 2005-6, when the prize was a return to the football league, our average gate was 1,895 In our first 'honeymoon' season back in the football league, the average gate was 2,260. Let's get real! We're never, never, ever going to increase home attendance to any significant level. Nor should we expect to. Constrained by our low population & hemmed in by our two big neighbours, I doubt we'd scrape 4,000 fans if we made the Championship. Our gates are what they are for good reason & there's little point gnashing our teeth about it. The kids are the most important element in the future success of ASFC, something the club is making positive steps to encourage. Until then, let's be grateful we're so lucky, lucky, lucky to be playing football in League 1 - against some clubs than make Bournemouth look like a minnow. |
Re: Bits & Bobs
its not just about population of accrington and bournemouth either. if you live in accrington you have two of the biggest clubs in england just down the road as well as burnley and blackburn. i imagine there will be a few who watch the two liverpool clubs as well. in bournemouth its just them and the nearest southampton is hardly on the doorstep. thank the gates of just over 1000 was an insult to stanley but getting over 2000 that hopefully will grow is maybe all the club could realistically ask for.
|
Re: Bits & Bobs
Well if you want to compare the two Bournemouth were in League One 2012-13 and got promoted.
They spent £1.6 million on players - Fraser, Ritchie, Grabban, and Elphick. They recouped £950k selling Scott Malone. Net deficit £650k. Sometimes you've got to be brave. |
Re: Bits & Bobs
Quote:
|
Re: Bits & Bobs
Theres a big difference between brave and stupid.
|
Re: Bits & Bobs
There’s also now at least one other big difference between Bournemouth and Stanley. Bournemouth do not own their stadium and, from the recent kefuffle over Dean Court, are not willing to be ‘held to ransom’ by its owner.
So maybe that’s why they opted to spend their anticipated Championship moolah on players. Having said that, in 2013 the vacant end did have a 2,400 seat stand built. So, if you‘re located in one of the wealthiest parts of the country and have enough money, it seems you can spend it on both players (club) and the ground (landlord). |
Re: Bits & Bobs
Or you could just have Chinese billionaire owners with little respect for the FFP rules?
|
Re: Bits & Bobs
Quote:
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:33. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com