![]() |
Morecambe thread
Greetings
A slightly belated match preview for you here... Funnily enough yesterday was quite busy! ASFC News Story > 3825 Will try and get a bit of audio up later on. Dan |
Re: Morecambe thread
Good luck Stanley, keep the great record vs Morecambe going.
|
Re: Morecambe thread
40 minutes from showtime here at the Crown.
No team news as yet, but I'll let you know! |
Re: Morecambe thread
Boulding and Murphy are in for Putterill and Jacobson...
Stanley: Dunbavin, Murphy, Edwards, Hessey, Winnard, Barnett, Procter, Ryan, Boulding, McConville, Gornell |
Re: Morecambe thread
Strange that, get Razor and Joe signed up and then drop them to bench. Oh well, c'mon the reds, pity I cannot be there though.
|
Re: Morecambe thread
Joe is not in at all. Ineligible. Didn't sign in time yesterday.
Full subs shortly! |
Re: Morecambe thread
I'm with you tonight, Pete's working so I have Emily who as luck would have it is already in bed!!! Just hope Murphy has a good game, it sounds more like a 4-4-2 than our usual 4-5-1(4-3-3). Come on red men!!!
|
Re: Morecambe thread
Subs: Cisak, Lindfield, Putterill, Richardson, Joyce, Parkinson, Owens
|
Re: Morecambe thread
Thanks Dan; lets hope it's a good night for Stanley. Evening all.
|
Re: Morecambe thread
We are off...
|
Re: Morecambe thread
Come on lads - keep the run going!
Good evening all :) |
Re: Morecambe thread
1 - early Stanley chance: Boulding shooting from the edge of the box but Barry Roche doing well to parry
|
Re: Morecambe thread
Boulding is in the attacking midfield three. The usual 4-2-3-1
|
Re: Morecambe thread
7: Barnett sees a shot turned behind for a corner
|
Re: Morecambe thread
14: an effort from Jevons clips the Stanley post
|
Re: Morecambe thread
26: Rory Boulding clears a goalbound header from Andy Parrish off the line
|
Re: Morecambe thread
Bloody hell Dan, this is so painful, get back on the radio....wake me if we goal, Goal.......("",)
|
Re: Morecambe thread
good game at macc with bury 3-2 up at the moment
|
Re: Morecambe thread
This has been fairly uninspiring...
|
Re: Morecambe thread
42: Roche turns a Ryan free kick around the post
|
Re: Morecambe thread
One minute added time
|
Re: Morecambe thread
Half time 0-0
|
Re: Morecambe thread
time to wake up and get a pie dan
|
Re: Morecambe thread
Stanley 0 Morecambe 0. Half time report - ASFC News Story > 3827
|
Re: Morecambe thread
Second half begins...
|
Re: Morecambe thread
46: Dunbavin tested by a shot from Phil Jevons
|
Re: Morecambe thread
47: Another save by Dunbavin, this time from Holdsworth's 25-yarder
|
Re: Morecambe thread
listening on line is it kicking off dan?
|
Re: Morecambe thread
60: Putterill replaces Boulding
|
Re: Morecambe thread
Quote:
|
Re: Morecambe thread
66: Goal for Morecambe - long throw into the box, finds Jevons who side foots it into the corner. Stanley 0 Morecambe 1
|
Re: Morecambe thread
67: Stanley close to an equaliser - Putterill's low skidding shot from the left pushed away by the keeper
|
Re: Morecambe thread
time for 4-4-2
|
Re: Morecambe thread
What happened ?
|
Re: Morecambe thread
Quote:
|
Re: Morecambe thread
Penalty to Stanley!
|
Re: Morecambe thread
Edwards sends the keeper the wrong way
1-1 |
Re: Morecambe thread
go sunbeds
|
Re: Morecambe thread
get in mr sunbeds
|
Re: Morecambe thread
Go on the lads !
|
Re: Morecambe thread
Missed both; went for a pee......
|
Re: Morecambe thread
76: Lindfield replaces McConville
|
Re: Morecambe thread
Edwards has just been denied again by a good save from Roche
|
Re: Morecambe thread
Northampton,tanning Crewe 6 : 1 !
|
Re: Morecambe thread
Crewe scored first in that game aswell!!!
|
Re: Morecambe thread
Both sides have had late chances, but it's still level...
|
Re: Morecambe thread
Come on Stanley Boys........
|
Re: Morecambe thread
3 added minutes...
|
Re: Morecambe thread
All over. Honours even. 1-1
|
Re: Morecambe thread
Cheer's Dan....
|
Re: Morecambe thread
Not the win that was expected but still a point gained.
Thanks Dan. :) |
Re: Morecambe thread
cheers dan bit dissapointed but 1 is better than none and we keep up our record against the shrimps 6 years and counting
|
Re: Morecambe thread
I really don't think that the game should have been played. When in the Football League, teams shouldn't have to play AROUND an area of the pitch. Unbelievable.
As for the football itself, we were embarrassing and didn't deserve our point. Only Ray Putterill showed any spark or forward thinking. Peter Murphy... why? I can't put how crap that game was into words, so I'll end on the more comforting note that however bad we play, Morecambe will never beat the Stanley. Now... who wants to go to Stevenage?! Urgh. |
Re: Morecambe thread
A very disjointed performance from the Reds
Back four seemed to be all at sea for big chunks of the second half in particular and no doubt Bavs kept us in it with a string of fine saves. Very lightweight through the middle and up top, there was some nice build up play in parts but we seemed to see a return to the long punt up the park and then back at us which also reduced a lot of Stanley efforts to come from distance. A draw was probably a get out of jail on the night is about the best I can summon |
Re: Morecambe thread
Poor gate and an even poorer performance. Cant understand why Murphy played either when there are better players IMO that can't for some unknown reason make the Bench. No inspiration for play offs in this shoddy poor performance. Blooming disappointed tonight and we were lucky to walk away with a point. This performance wont entice more support. Again no pride or passion when there should be competition for places.
|
Re: Morecambe thread
Would like to see Bateson get another chance in the starting eleven as thought he had a good start to the season. Personally think he created chances and showed promise. Still frustrated at tonights charade time to sign out.
|
Re: Morecambe thread
Quote:
|
Re: Morecambe thread
first 10 mins they looked pretty good, then deteriorated into dis-jointed crap, 25 mins from time putterill on fer the useless boulding, then n only then did stanley look real dangerous, not a good show, but could have nicked it at the end, agree bavs made a few good saves, if he could learn to kick the ball, would improve a bit more.:rolleyes:
|
Re: Morecambe thread
Pitch is a cabbage patch. No way will we get anywhere near the play-offs having to plough our way through that. After any heavy rain it will just get worse.:(
Bavs MOM for me, in spite of his kicking. |
Re: Morecambe thread
Bavs did some great saves today , But it does get embarrassing when , he kicks the ball and it goes over the top of the stand .
|
Re: Morecambe thread
Agree with most of the above , a draw was probably a fair result. The pitch was the winner, its an absolute bog, again! Though both keepers had good games. Agreed boulding had a poor game, but he isn't a left winger so no surprise for me. Razor had a superb impact and must start at stevenage on Saturday. Thought murphy was better than previous games but how keeps leam and bateson out the team is beyond me. As for the off the field incident in the clayton end, both the stewards and some of the si called stanley supporters need to take a look at thereselves, absolute disgrace.
|
Re: Morecambe thread
what off the field incident smudge?:eek::confused:
|
Re: Morecambe thread
To be fair i thought morecambe worked very hard and didnt allow stanley to settle on the ball and with playing 2 up front and 2 wide men caused Acci a lot of problems.
The pitch didnt help and only when we got some width (putterill) and an extra forward(linfield) did our tempo increase. Had enough good chances to win the game,but morecambe would say the same!, I thought a draw was a fair result. |
Re: Morecambe thread
Murphy had a great chance to win it late on but totally fluffed it. Although with how bad we played it would have been daylight robbery should he have put it away. Dont feel he is ready for league 2 and like whats been said there are far more experienced players in the squad. Gotta question decision to give him another start after his previous performances. Mom Bavs - kept them in it but didnt like long balls hoofed up the pitch.
And I didnt see an incident either! |
Re: Morecambe thread
From whwer I was sat I could see something was happeneing at the Clayton end but don't know what,but I do know it was more exciting off the pitch than on. To say £70,000 was spent on improving the pitch is money wasted.
|
Re: Morecambe thread
Quote:
|
Re: Morecambe thread
Quote:
|
Re: Morecambe thread
Well thats what I understand to have been spent on the pitch £70,000 . If anyone knows any different please say.
|
Re: Morecambe thread
I am know pitch expert and to a degree I understand it can be hinderance to Stanley's passing game but it is the same for both sides.
Morecambe did work hard and closed down very well and to be fair they also had at least one decent claim for a penalty. Stanley had a few personnel changes and whether that unsettled their normal flowing movement on the night I am not sure? |
Re: Morecambe thread
Quote:
|
Re: Morecambe thread
Quote:
|
Re: Morecambe thread
Google Page Ranking your right as there forwards worked as a pair,but i liked the way they defended from the front by both going wide and working hard to stop Acci playing from the back.
Notice how many times Hessey was forced to go long by being put under pressure, Thought Gornell had another good game against Charnock,who looks a half decent player and built like a brick s--thouse !! |
All times are GMT. The time now is 03:02. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com