![]() |
Share Issue Notice
|
Re: Share Issue Notice
Quote:
|
Re: Share Issue Notice
Quote:
I was a bit suprised but when I read that because it's different to the original thoughts. I suspect though that to avoid your fears the following may have been changed to make sure that total ownership becomes extremely difficult. Quote:
|
Re: Share Issue Notice
I agree, Macca.
What's to stop some 'fit and proper' person taking over and becoming the next bully. If the idea is to spread ownership as widely as possible there shouldn't there be a cap on anyone person/organisation/company/group of related companies taking a majority control. Unless, of course, 51% is vested in a Supporters Trust or such like. |
Re: Share Issue Notice
Quote:
|
Re: Share Issue Notice
Thing is .........to wait whilst the Full Details are in the public domain, can't really comment until all is revealed.;)
|
Re: Share Issue Notice
Quote:
No idea, depends if it's a decision the board can make or an AGM issue. In reality it wouldn't make good business sense to stop somebody paying the right price to own the club, you never know when another Abramovitch comes along. You just got to make sure the price is right. I'm not convinced though given Ilyas and Peter's feelings for the club it's going to be as simple as the initial wording could be interpreted as :) |
Re: Share Issue Notice
Quote:
|
Re: Share Issue Notice
Quote:
That said I'm taking out of my box; I can't see that the whole area of interest would achieve the total value of the issues; what I mean by that is that in this current financial environment not many of us will be able take up much more than a token share; I do recall that Ilyas in a statement somewhere said he would underwrite the issue; so by taking up the unissued shares he would hold the majority share in the name of the community until the opportunity arises to reissue in the future. This would give us a 9ct guarantee that the club remains in safe hands until the greater Accrington Stanley/Accrington Town is mature enough to take on full community ownership. I think. |
Re: Share Issue Notice
Quote:
|
Re: Share Issue Notice
well I hope that is the case Doug, because the way it appears in black and white would suggest that an individual could provide £501,000 and become the majority shareholder thus returning us back to six months previous. It might be more than what the company is actually worth but £501k isn't a lot of money to own a League 2 Football Club that is there or thereabouts solvent and profitable (possibly).
The sale of shares is going into the club rather than an individuals pocket and that coupled with the imminent influx of transfer money should provide a very healthy bank balance. I too though would assume that some form of sub-text will be incorporated somewhere to disqualify profiteering. As far as the ownership of current shares and transference is concerned, the current 'value' is 100k and the new value is 1m. Therefore divide your current % by 10 and you will have your new value in percentage should it be the case that transference is on the agenda. |
Re: Share Issue Notice
Quote:
|
Re: Share Issue Notice
whilst i am aware voting in that way has always been so,in business, i have never agreed wi that principal n never will.
|
Re: Share Issue Notice
I think they'll be lucky to sell a decent fraction of those shares, never mind sell half a million to one person
|
Re: Share Issue Notice
Quote:
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:28. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com