Accrington Web

Accrington Web (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/index.php)
-   Accrington Stanley (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f93/)
-   -   Andy Procter (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f93/andy-procter-61100.html)

lancsdave 31-03-2012 18:38

Re: Andy Procter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Tommy McQueen (Post 981562)
On radio lancs tonight Wesley said he had been told by the Shefield bench that his team had been leaked by some of the Preston players before the game, giving advantage to Shefield, trouble int mill I fear.


He really does come up witrh some rubbish. Everybody else's fault

smobile 31-03-2012 20:01

Re: Andy Procter
 
Hate the man. Not the right fit for a decent club like Preston. Don't like looking for their results and hoping they've lost. Can't help it though while he's there.

Haggis316 31-03-2012 20:08

Re: Andy Procter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Tommy McQueen (Post 981562)
giving advantage to Shefield, trouble int mill I fear.

Sheffield did not need an advantage to beat Preston on that performance.

smudgie 31-03-2012 20:10

Re: Andy Procter
 
Along with Steve Evans & Mark Roberts........... The most disgusting man in football.

smobile 31-03-2012 20:38

Re: Andy Procter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by smudgie (Post 981588)
Along with Steve Evans & Mark Roberts........... The most disgusting man in football.

Agreed. Vermin. All 3 of them.

shakermaker 31-03-2012 20:44

Re: Andy Procter
 
Watch out Graham...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2opHHNFd0Mg

smudgie 31-03-2012 20:48

Re: Andy Procter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by smobile (Post 981596)
Agreed. Vermin. All 3 of them.


I like you smobile :alright::alright::alright::alright::alright::alri ght::alright::alright::alright:

tonyalveston 01-04-2012 10:46

Re: Andy Procter
 
We are urgently in need of a Procter in terms of effort!! We saw another pathetic performance from Barnett (lazy ). The player has the ability when he wants to make an effort, as in the last 20 mins today.
The way Cook is playing, we dont need a midfield,if he continues to simply boot the ball long.
We have been used to playing to feet from the back, which makes for entertaining football, so lets get back to basics please

Cook was such a good player himself, so why this shocking long ball game?

shakermaker 01-04-2012 11:57

Re: Andy Procter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by tonyalveston (Post 981677)
We are urgently in need of a Procter in terms of effort!! We saw another pathetic performance from Barnett (lazy ). The player has the ability when he wants to make an effort, as in the last 20 mins today.
The way Cook is playing, we dont need a midfield,if he continues to simply boot the ball long.
We have been used to playing to feet from the back, which makes for entertaining football, so lets get back to basics please

Cook was such a good player himself, so why this shocking long ball game?

Maybe it's because of the fact that we do not have a midfield to play through?!

I thought our long ball game was very clever yesterday. Podge smartly made the most of Wimbledon's high back line on goal kicks and our wingers made a lot of the second balls. I'm sure that once Cook gets to build his side in the summer we will see more intricate tactics but for now we have to work with what we have.

cashman 01-04-2012 12:13

Re: Andy Procter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by shakermaker (Post 981688)
Maybe it's because of the fact that we do not have a midfield to play through?!

I thought our long ball game was very clever yesterday. Podge smartly made the most of Wimbledon's high back line on goal kicks and our wingers made a lot of the second balls. I'm sure that once Cook gets to build his side in the summer we will see more intricate tactics but for now we have to work with what we have.

Whilst i dislike the long ball,thats my conclusion, Disagree wi Tony about Barnett, Ok he was much better second half, I reckon that display will have helped his confidence, After all hes only a kid n experience will come. can remember Bobby Grant n others,who when just trying to get established, never looked that great, I can see a good future fer Barnett if he carries on learning n at some stage will make stanley a bob or two.

tonyalveston 01-04-2012 14:49

Re: Andy Procter
 
I do not disagree with Shakermaker or Cashman, but we have been used to flowing football! As i said Barnett has the ability, but he does need to display a sense of interest, determination and Im sure he will progress.

It was obvious that Cook had given him a good talking to at half time, may it long continue.

winstanley asfc 01-04-2012 19:14

Re: Andy Procter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by smudgie (Post 981588)
Along with Steve Evans & Mark Roberts........... The most disgusting man in football.

Mark Roberts was at Stanley during the period i was in hospital and recovering at home, therefore i don't know anything about him apart from seeing him on the ITV documentory series in September 2008. I'm curious as to why he's so bad?:confused: ;)

smudgie 01-04-2012 19:45

Re: Andy Procter
 
He constantly slates us....................... plus he got Mcconville deliberately sent off in the Playoff's last season.

He was useless when we had him....... and STILL IS !!

Revived Red 02-04-2012 09:33

Re: Andy Procter
 
At the risk of having a plague wished upon me by some posters, I feel that Mark Roberts does not deserve some of the venom directed at him. When he was at Stanley, let's not forget that he spent most of his time doing his own job at centre back and at the same time covering for a lump of dough named Graham Branch (not one of Coley's better signings). Roberts himself seemed to fall out with Coley and that is the reason for his antipathy to Accy - it's not about the club.

As for the play off incident, McConville got himself sent off.

It seems unlikely that he is "still useless" - surely his performances for Satange, especially against higher opposition in cup games, suggest otherwise. :hidewall:

smudgie 02-04-2012 09:41

Re: Andy Procter
 
There are only 3 men I hate in football, he is one im afraid. and always will be.


All times are GMT. The time now is 14:11.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com