Accrington Web
Page 4 of 16 123 4 567891011121314 Last »
Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

Accrington Web (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/index.php)
-   Accrington Stanley (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f93/)
-   -   Rob heys (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f93/rob-heys-64707.html)

Redraine 05-08-2013 18:32
Re: Rob heys
 
I'm still waiting for the results of the club's "internal enquiry" into the last betting scandal.
What a shocking mess.

Redraine 05-08-2013 18:40
Re: Rob heys
 
Rochdale forum:-

"Can't help but feel this sort of thing is rife at Accy, first the whole cav thing, now this. Also we have seen first hand that coleman didn't mind his players gambling and to an extent encouraged it."

No doubt Dav007 can put them right on that?

DAV007 05-08-2013 18:43
Re: Rob heys
 
Yeah

football19 05-08-2013 18:46
Re: Rob heys
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Redraine (Post 1070047)
Rochdale forum:-

"Can't help but feel this sort of thing is rife at Accy, first the whole cav thing, now this. Also we have seen first hand that coleman didn't mind his players gambling and to an extent encouraged it."

No doubt Dav007 can put them right on that?
I will give you 5/4 it's a load of rubbish :)

Chubbyman 05-08-2013 19:17
Re: Rob heys
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by DAV007 (Post 1070033)
That's a horrible thing to say.

I asked some legit questions as to why Rob Heys is untouchable in so many of this forum users eyes, and made a point about the previous betting scandal.
I also asked why they club where letting the other media outlets run with the story instead of putting out a response.

Nice to see they have put out a response.

And what a great way to prepare for a big cup match, but then again ,it will all be Ian Dunbavins fault, or John Colemans fault, or Sean McConvilles fault, etc.


Sorry for looking a little deeper.
Sounds like DAV007 has got something right at long last!!!

bdc 05-08-2013 22:40
Re: Rob heys
 
Personally I think RH is ok but he does need to brush up on some things, that said I think we should reserve judgement on this case until all the facts have been established. There is no point in prejudging something that we don't know all the details about.

It could well be a simple error on his part or a failure to follow protocol, either way it could have a massive impact on his career, therefore I have nothing else to say on it as I don't think it is appropriate for us to cast judgement on this as we don't know all the facts.

xavtia 05-08-2013 23:10
Re: Rob heys
 
He's admitted the charge but asked for a personal hearing and has withdrawn from all club duties until the regulatory committee delivers its findings according to the BBC website

Revived Red 05-08-2013 23:13
Re: Rob heys
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by xavtia (Post 1070117)
He's admitted the charge but asked for a personal hearing and has withdrawn from all club duties until the regulatory committee delivers its findings according to the BBC website
And also according to the club website.

maccawozzagod 06-08-2013 00:53
Re: Rob heys
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by xavtia (Post 1070117)
He's admitted the charge but asked for a personal hearing and has withdrawn from all club duties until the regulatory committee delivers its findings according to the BBC website
Quote:
Originally Posted by Revived Red (Post 1070118)
And also according to the club website.

I think it's important to point out that the wording on the Stanley website is that he has accepted the charge - not admitted it.

Pendle Red 06-08-2013 05:20
Re: Rob heys
 
Emphasis firmly on those lads on the pitch

Tommy McQueen 06-08-2013 08:13
Re: Rob heys
 
Another dark cloud hanging over us but we are used to it. Lets get behind James and the boys.

Revived Red 06-08-2013 08:25
Re: Rob heys
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by maccawozzagod (Post 1070124)
I think it's important to point out that the wording on the Stanley website is that he has accepted the charge - not admitted it.
Agreed - a careful choice of words. But the BBC now states "Cameron Jerome and Robert Heys admit betting offences". We all know that the BBC and accuracy do not sit happily together, but that is a dangerous thing to say if not correct.

Div3North 06-08-2013 09:21
Re: Rob heys
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by maccawozzagod (Post 1070124)
I think it's important to point out that the wording on the Stanley website is that he has accepted the charge - not admitted it.
Apart from the indication given on the BBC web, Macca, "accepted" in that context invariably means "admitted", rather than just "received". Were he just agreeing that he'd received the formal notification of the charges you can be sure the statement would have made that clear.

Now we wait for the hearing and the rest of the story; wild speculation, or "kangeroo court judgement" helps no-one

Div3North 06-08-2013 09:23
Re: Rob heys
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tommy McQueen (Post 1070138)
Lets get behind James and the boys.
Amen to that!

xavtia 06-08-2013 13:14
Re: Rob heys
 
I was only quoting the wording on the BBC website.


All times are GMT. The time now is 18:50.
Page 4 of 16 123 4 567891011121314 Last »
Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com