York match thread
 

before disappearing down the road for a family dinner I thought I would set up ready to follow the match comm. on my return. For at least the last 3 games I get the message that capacity exceeds that set by the 'host' so can only resort to coverage by the beeb. Have Stanley given up providing this service does anyone know ?

Re: York match thread
 

I was thinking the same...........

Will try to keep the forum up to date via twitter etc

Re: York match thread
 

Simpson, Hunt, Tom, Rob, Deano, Proccy, Joyce, Piero, Molly, Maguire, Crooksy :)

Re: York match thread
 

Team ........

Simpson
Hunt
Aldred
Atkinson
Winnard
Proccy
Joyce
Mingoia
Maguire
Moly
Crooks


Subs
Dawber
Liddle
Mccarten
Windass
Gray
Naismith
Barry

Re: York match thread
 

I would love someone to tell me how on EARTH that clown is back in the XI?!

Re: York match thread
 

Sounds like we are getting battered according to the twitter feed..........

Re: York match thread
 

0-1

:(

Re: York match thread
 

It defies all reason, Smudgie!

Re: York match thread
 

Not won at home this season.... typical!

Re: York match thread
 

It's fine - we never score at KitKat Crescent till the last minute, we're just lulling them into a false sense of security:)

Re: York match thread
 

I hope so Accymad!

Re: York match thread
 

Coley to work his halftime magic - will still be disappointed with less than 3 points today.

Re: York match thread
 

Taken from Twitter.........

"Best chance falls to Crooks, who failed to capitalise"

:(

Re: York match thread
 

Are you not at the match watching Smudge ?

Re: York match thread
 

York down to 10 - might well cause them to condense and go for 1 - 0

Re: York match thread
 

Currently in bed with manflu :(

Re: York match thread
 

Why did we start with 10 men?

Re: York match thread
 

Come on Stanley ... playing against 10 men ... score !!!!!

Re: York match thread
 

Moly hits the post :(

Last 10 minutes.....

Re: York match thread
 

They need goal shooting training these lads .. just not getting the balls in the net ...:cool:

Re: York match thread
 

7 mins added on COME ON STANLEY!

Re: York match thread
 

All over 0-1.

Awful result considering their form.

Looking forward to hearing the reports...... Not.

Re: York match thread
 

Bahhumbug

Re: York match thread
 

There's not much gets past you is there - talk about stating the obvious! :rolleyes:

Re: York match thread
 

Do u actually watch the match or just follow social media ??

Re: York match thread
 

Well...BLOODY AWFUL RESULT considering their poor home record (UNTIL NOW)!!!
Typical WHY OH WHY do Stanley give the poorer sides we should be thrashing a leg up?????
Oxford Utd , Dagenham and Redbridge and now York ...with 10 men......
Well I suppose we had 10 men also ...seems Crooks was on the pitch and did one of his great misses free header ...straight at Cisak it said wonderful!!!!
Well Coley wanted a Merry Christmas..........BAH HUMBUG!!!!!!

Re: York match thread
 

Re: York match thread
 

......and yet he is critical of the defence.

Unbelievable.

Re: York match thread
 

Excuse me?! I'm at every single home game & as many away games as I can afford & have been for more years than I care to remember - even was one of the intrepid bunch who did the 560 odd mile round trip to Yeovil whereas you only seem to have popped up recently - don't get me wrong, I'm not saying that the length of time anyone has been supporting Stanley makes them any better a fan than more recent converts but what gives you the right to question anyone else's support?

Re: York match thread
 

Sorry ! If you felt that was a pop at you when actually I was on about someone else ... :hehetable

Re: York match thread
 

Try 'quoting' the comment you're aiming at and other folk won't need to respond.

Re: York match thread
 

He's not a Stanley fan anyway. He's a Crooks fan and nothing else.

Good riddance to both.

Re: York match thread
 

Just back only thing to say is WHY? again start with a lad that is not a striker, never will be, when theres lads in the squad, they aint prolific but will pop up with a goal occasionally.:rolleyes:The super one should at least have the decency to explain this striker that never was, but somehow i doubt it.:rolleyes:

Re: York match thread
 

Back home to angry to comment ,I'll leave it to Cashman.....I will say one thing...Super Johnny Coleman couldn't pick his nose....He must be getting paid to play Crookes..simple as

Re: York match thread
 

Also the york goal our 6ft odd striker was outjumped by a lad who looked at least 6" shorter,:rolleyes: Have just read the crap J.C. has just come out with, It was HIS fault fer the team he put out simple as, also crap is they put 10 behind the ball, that was only in last 10 mins, they dominated the game after their lad was sent off n attacked the arse off us.

Re: York match thread
 

Agree with above, some questions for the tactical genius:

Why was Crooks playing? (Almost felt sorry for him today, looked shot, shouldn't have been playing)

Has anyone seen Moly play well since he's been back?

Why put The erratic Windass on when Naismith was sitting there (remember his set pieces on sat?)

We actually looked quite lively with Gray and McCarten together and looked like we might get something (definitely one cast iron penalty denied) until the tactical genius stuck Aldred up from as well, dragging extra defenders in so there was no space for the other two.

Also why, when we throw a c back up front to give us a physical presence, do we keep playing tippy tippy at the back?? Hunt didn't play a forward pass more than 5 yards all day - awful performance.

Then to cap a miserable day the tactical genius insults everyone by complaining of inconsistency when his team selections and decisions actually go a long way to create the inconsistencies!!

Re: York match thread
 

Tactical genius = My arse.

No Carver on the bench again...... For yet another petty reason. Yet golden boy starts...

Absolute joke.

Re: York match thread
 

Do we have to pay Crooks wages if he doesnt start?

Re: York match thread
 

DAV he's seriously out of sorts,we would have beat Yeovil twice if it wasn't for Crookes..So no matter what it costs us we shouldn't be playing him..In my eyes Colemans cost Stanley 1/2 a million playing him...Super Johnny Coleman my arse.

Re: York match thread
 

If he doesn't appear on the pitch I think is more accurate... hence his introduction as sub against Wycombe...........

Re: York match thread
 

Well there's one thing for sure, Crooks is CONSISTENTLY crap and Coleman CONSISTENTLY picks him regardless of being CONSISTENTLY criticized by the supporters.

Re: York match thread
 

I can only imagine how down Gray, Carver and Bowerman are right now !

Re: York match thread
 

Especially when you consider that Gray is still our top scorer in spite of hardly having a sniff of game time since the loanees came in!

Re: York match thread
 

“We are also not taking our chances and we are too inconsistent. We have got to get the right formula and ingredients to win games.”

:confused:

Re: York match thread
 

Perfectly true, but yeh need the lads wi the best chances of taking them imho, thats gotta be part of the formula.;)

Re: York match thread
 

Is it the same situation as Joe Lumley, we cant afford not to play him as we cant afford the wages?
Which leaves the question, why not use him as a sub?

Re: York match thread
 

Don't tell me! Crocks..sorry Crooks was crap again!! Anyone remember Stanley's current holder of Crappiest Stanley Player Ever Paul Crichton? Well it looks like he's about to relinquish his title! :o

Re: York match thread
 

He is definitely up there with Jack Sampson, James alibi and Justin Jackson for me!

Re: York match thread
 

And branch??

Re: York match thread
 

When does Crooks loan finish that will cure the problem.

Re: York match thread
 

What about Onibuje. I bought his shirt on ebay and it was half the price of buying a replica in the shop :D

Re: York match thread
 

To be fair it doesn't look as though he lacks effort or commitment, he is obviously being played out of position - is that his fault? It's the manager who keeps putting him in!

Re: York match thread
 

And yet few, if any, have directed any criticism at the other striker picked to tear the so can!!ed 'flimsy' York City defence to shreds !.
It is my humble opinion that John Maguire just failed to turn up yesterday !. His head was down, he was not only out of touch with his strike partner (?)...but also the rest of the team.
His attempts at chasing lost balls back were infrequent and ineffective, and on the few occasions he saw an opportunity to put the Goalkeeper under any threat at pass-backs , these were too late and half hearted.
Perhaps he was missing John no ?.... But didn't we all ?. Seems to me that a regular goalscorer does not exist in our current squad, and we need one badly !
The Referee unfortunately did not follow the accepted pattern of being in a position to see what was happening in the more important areas of the pitch and therefore missed one nailed-on penalty. This tackle was made no more than 10 metres from where I was standing and only McCartens feet and no ball contact occurred !...He also I felt allowed some of his decisions to be dominated by home crowd pressure!.....definitely not the man for the job !..

Finally, the White Knight bit !.... How dare anyone even suspect that our dear AccyMad is not a true Fan ?... But then she can fight her own battles !...Seasons greetings AM ..xxx

Re: York match thread
 

like most I have yet too see Crooks have a good game but you can not blame the lad for the lack of ambition up front, most of our shooting looked like passes back to their goalkeeper, the defence looked sound apart from the free header from which they scored, the team looked tired, which may have had something to do with the J B's excessive warm up programme prior to the match

Re: York match thread
 

Forgot to mention the 200+ Fans who travelled yesterday !....they were all in great voice and didn't give up on the team ..except one it seemed!...for a minute .
Stood next to Choirboy for the first half , who gave me a demonstration of the various sounds both celebratory and derogatory which he could produce on his red and white Vulvazulu !.
I was impressed to a level where I was seduced in to joining in the assorted chants which the Ultras surrounding me were belting out !..( Well some of them anyway !.).
All in all a good afternoon...except for the result !.

Re: York match thread
 

A poor day out for the Stanley Faithful. The team did not play up at all against a relatively poor but enthusiastic York side. Their fans too played their part with a great show of "Ultras" flags at the start as the players came out. I really miss our Ultras Flags at our home matches. I thought that Simpson did quite well in goal and that the defence looked quite soild with Tom, Rob and Deano having good games. Can't understand why Liddle has been left out after playing so well consistenetly since his return. Midfield struggled to create any forward pressure and build ups were spasmodic with only occasional bits of flair from Moly. He nearly conjured up a wonder goal with his left wand near the end. Up front we were woeful until McArten came on. He definiteley should have been awarded a penalty as Yonmon says. There was another shout for a penalty on McArten but I think he has been watching Gray and has learnt how to 'fall down'.
With a bit of luck we could have had a draw or even won it. Rob, Tom and Deano, (defenders!) all had chances but they were hit too near their keeper who collected them easily. If one of these had gone in it could have been a different story.
The York lad who got sent off should be banned for 6 matches at least as his 'tackle' on Tom was nothing short of 'assult' and Tom is lucky not to have his leg in plaster today. I thought that the Ref did well then as it was looking like a big rumpus was about to flare up but he cleverly brandished the Red Card immediately, which took the sting out of the situation. Then it got worse as the York lad walked off to a standing ovation by the muppets in the main stand. I have to say that I was really upset by this moronic showing from the York fans who then proceeded to 'Boo' every time Tom touched the ball.....Disgraceful behaviour!
Naismith should have been used as his running at defenders and his crosses could have unlocked their defence.
Hey ho....
KEEP THE FAITH:alright::signbeer:
ON STANLEY ON:wave8:

Re: York match thread
 

Its completely baffling why Naismith was not used, in the last game his crosses were pinpoint which led to Maguires equaliser, n he was MoM fer me. But still the super one knows best.:rolleyes: