Accrington Web
Page 3 of 4 12 3 4
Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

Accrington Web (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/index.php)
-   Accrington Stanley (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f93/)
-   -   Dagenham match thread. (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f93/dagenham-match-thread-67704.html)

Exile on Spencer St 25-10-2015 11:42
Re: Dagenham match thread.
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Outback Ozzy (Post 1153320)
. There was a scout in front of me watch Joe Wright and looking at his notes, he didn't think too much of him. Personally, I hope he stays with us f..or a couple of years!


Hopefully the scout was from Huddersfield!;)

shakermaker 25-10-2015 15:05
Quote:
Originally Posted by football19 (Post 1153340)
How did Barry play at fullback?,I am sure he wasn't 100%,good pro,big heart.
We look a better, more composed side when Ant is in it, wherever he plays. Such a shame for him that Conneely is doing so well.

andyd 25-10-2015 15:46
Re: Dagenham match thread.
 
When Barry came on what he did do was a lot of shouting and organizing a back line with a average age of 20 and limited leauge game experience which is a often overlooked big part of the game especially with younger players this I thought went missing on Tuesday. A sign of a good side when going infront is keeping composed keeping shape and keeping hold of the round thing called the ball even if this means passing backwards much to the annoyance of the get it upfield brigade who even moan when 3-0 up if this happens if you keep possession they can,t get back into the game and I thought we did this very well Saturday apart from a 5 minute spell when we let them score hope we learn to do this more often and we won,t be far away.

cashman 25-10-2015 15:49
Re: Dagenham match thread.
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by andyd (Post 1153371)
When Barry came on what he did do was a lot of shouting and organizing a back line with a average age of 20 and limited leauge game experience which is a often overlooked big part of the game especially with younger players this I thought went missing on Tuesday. A sign of a good side when going infront is keeping composed keeping shape and keeping hold of the round thing called the ball even if this means passing backwards much to the annoyance of the get it upfield brigade who even moan when 3-0 up if this happens if you keep possession they can,t get back into the game and I thought we did this very well Saturday apart from a 5 minute spell when we let them score hope we learn to do this more often and we won,t be far away.
Well he should have been brought on to do that job on tuesday,rather than n attacking midfielder imho

andyd 25-10-2015 15:56
Re: Dagenham match thread.
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by cashman (Post 1153373)
Well he should have been brought on to do that job on tuesday,rather than n attacking midfielder imho
How right thou are;)

Exile on Spencer St 25-10-2015 17:14
Re: Dagenham match thread.
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by cashman (Post 1153373)
Well he should have been brought on to do that job on tuesday,rather than n attacking midfielder imho
Quote:
Originally Posted by andyd (Post 1153374)
How right thou are;)
Stop it, andyd, you'll only encourage him.;)

Revived Red 25-10-2015 17:28
Re: Dagenham match thread.
 
Well I'm afraid I shall swim against the tide here and say that I thought the Barry was poor, notably his distribution. I can recall 3 occasions where he passed the ball about 15 yards directly to an opponent. A better team than Dagenham (and most teams are, I'm sure) would have punished us.

The mystery is Bucko. Did he have a fitness test prior to the game? Or was he played as a gamble? Sorry - I'll rephrase that :rolleyes:. Was a chance taken on him being fit? To my simple mind, it was a gamble (oops, sorry again - I mean chance) not worth taking because it could well have exacerbated his injury problem.

lancsdave 25-10-2015 19:06
Re: Dagenham match thread.
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Revived Red (Post 1153382)
The mystery is Bucko. Did he have a fitness test prior to the game? Or was he played as a gamble? Sorry - I'll rephrase that :rolleyes:. Was a chance taken on him being fit? To my simple mind, it was a gamble (oops, sorry again - I mean chance) not worth taking because it could well have exacerbated his injury problem.[/FONT]
Was he out injured ? I thought he'd been ill rather than injured and laid up for a few days according to his twitter.

Revived Red 25-10-2015 19:41
Re: Dagenham match thread.
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by lancsdave (Post 1153397)
Was he out injured ? I thought he'd been ill rather than injured and laid up for a few days according to his twitter.
You are probably correct, Dave. Being a fossil, I'm afraid I don't do twitter. I was going on the fact that he seemed to limp after the first tackle, and he walked off as though he was injured. Whatever it was, he seemed to my untrained, unmedical, unbadged mind to be unfit to start the game.

lancsdave 25-10-2015 20:01
Re: Dagenham match thread.
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Revived Red (Post 1153399)
You are probably correct, Dave. Being a fossil, I'm afraid I don't do twitter. I was going on the fact that he seemed to limp after the first tackle, and he walked off as though he was injured. Whatever it was, he seemed to my untrained, unmedical, unbadged mind to be unfit to start the game.

I didn't see what happened to him in the game so no idea if he got injured.

monkey hanger 26-10-2015 08:21
Re: Dagenham match thread.
 
did come on Saturday and glad I did. forget the fact that they were rubbish lets concentrate on how good we were. could have scored double the number we did and still their keeper would have had a good game. better balanced side and barry had his best game for us. only downside apart from adam buxtons early substitution was the decision not to give a penalty for the foul on mcconville most obvious i.ve seen. keep it up lads promotion can happen.

Revived Red 26-10-2015 15:29
Re: Dagenham match thread.
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by monkey hanger (Post 1153411)
barry had his best game for us
Gosh. I never realised he had been so bad in his previous games. :eek:

baldy 26-10-2015 17:50
Re: Dagenham match thread.
 
Only a Twitter rumour but apparently Swansea are looking at Josh Windass, Would make abit of sense with James Beattie being a first team coach there!

Hopefully with the new investment we won't be rolled over for transfer fees like in previous years!

lancsdave 26-10-2015 18:49
Re: Dagenham match thread.
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by baldy (Post 1153440)
Only a Twitter rumour but apparently Swansea are looking at Josh Windass, Would make abit of sense with James Beattie being a first team coach there!

Hopefully with the new investment we won't be rolled over for transfer fees like in previous years!
I've noticed when the scouts collect tickets, the level of clubs has gone up since the start of the season

andyd 26-10-2015 19:14
Re: Dagenham match thread.
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by baldy (Post 1153440)
Only a Twitter rumour but apparently Swansea are looking at Josh Windass, Would make abit of sense with James Beattie being a first team coach there!

Hopefully with the new investment we won't be rolled over for transfer fees like in previous years!
If they or any other club want Josh the starting point should be £1,000,000 let,s not be pushed around.


All times are GMT. The time now is 22:50.
Page 3 of 4 12 3 4
Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com