Accrington Web

Accrington Web (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/index.php)
-   Accrington Stanley (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f93/)
-   -   Sorry, Mr Burgess - still "tinpot" (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f93/sorry-mr-burgess-still-tinpot-68013.html)

deeayess 03-03-2016 16:28

Re: Sorry, Mr Burgess - still "tinpot"
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by stewthered (Post 1162914)
Does anyone know?

Bearing in mind I haven't lived in the Accy area for 20 years

- didn't we average nearly 2000 getting promoted from the Conf?
- where are those people (presuming they are nearly all from Hyndburn area)?
- Getting in Lg 1 is even better than getting in Lg 2- so where are they?
- back then Rovers were much more of a draw- so they're not watchin them
- New MD is going to try all sorts (some of which cant be popular with everyone)

Getting into the league was the attraction. it's more likely they don't go anywhere now but go to the pub and watch sport or stay at home and get any big game live online if you know how.

You can even go abroad for the weekend very cheap just like the Norwegians come here.

stewthered 03-03-2016 16:33

Re: Sorry, Mr Burgess - still "tinpot"
 
good point (TOM D)- bring on more fans! I bet that the away average is 7-800 in Lg1 plus surely more home fans will be attracted by Lg1. Atleast there a local sides. We'd have over 2000 for Oldham, Bury, Bradford, Chesterfield, Rochdale, Sheff Utd, Port Vale, Barnsley- pretty much all the matches!! Bring it on!!

mab 03-03-2016 16:43

Re: Sorry, Mr Burgess - still "tinpot"
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Tom D (Post 1162912)
They will all be paying full price because they are paying away fans. Paying money. As fans. Of a football club. Whether that's as an adult/student/concession/any category of ticket. My reference was to the fact that they will be paying. Money. Which everyone is at pains to point out is what the club needs. My point is money from away fans isn't any different to money from home fans. Where have I expressed any opinion on anything to do with admission prices depending on disability? How do you know I don't have a disability?

:) Stanley will make something on away fans that is true but also the away team(club) will make money on the ticket sales that the make when sold at there ground,a percentage is taken out as do Stanley when they sell any for away games.

mab 03-03-2016 16:49

Re: Sorry, Mr Burgess - still "tinpot"
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by stewthered (Post 1162917)
good point (TOM D)- bring on more fans! I bet that the away average is 7-800 in Lg1 plus surely more home fans will be attracted by Lg1. Atleast there a local sides. We'd have over 2000 for Oldham, Bury, Bradford, Chesterfield, Rochdale, Sheff Utd, Port Vale, Barnsley- pretty much all the matches!! Bring it on!!

Average away following for league 1clubs is 1500 but that's is an average has some clubs would bring more and some less.Chesterfield and Oldham are both in the bottom for at the moment, and not looking to good

Chrisr 03-03-2016 17:55

Re: Sorry, Mr Burgess - still "tinpot"
 
In league one I would hope to average 3000 then progress can be made. It won't happen overnight. But many of us will keep trying. Some will hide behind the keyboard and think their smart remarks are helpful. But this is the last I will post on here on this subject.

Tom D 03-03-2016 18:08

Re: Sorry, Mr Burgess - still "tinpot"
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mab (Post 1162920)
:) Stanley will make something on away fans that is true but also the away team(club) will make money on the ticket sales that the make when sold at there ground,a percentage is taken out as do Stanley when they sell any for away games.

Wasn't aware of this mab! Any idea what the percentage is?

maccawozzagod 03-03-2016 18:30

Re: Sorry, Mr Burgess - still "tinpot"
 
with regards to income and how best to generate it, I would suggest that our club WILL always struggle to make ends meet through the gates. One thing I suggested to Mr Marsden when he took the Chair was that we absolutely must learn the lessons of history and this club is doomed to always be the underdog. Does that mean we give up? Absolutely not, but we need to devise ways around it.

How many people get a taxi or bus to the ground? we need to be taking that money. Stan Lee's Taxis?

How many pints do our fans drink on matchday in establishments other than ours? We need to be taking that money.

How many people buy food on matchdays from establishments other than ours? We need that money

How many people have gym memberships? we need to be taking that money and it would also be a place for our players to go.

The last comment is a crucial one for me. It's not just the gym idea, there are others. But something that the club may spend money could be turned into a business idea under our clubs umbrella. The club premises do not need to stop at Livingstone Road. We absolutely could have Stan Lee's Gym. There is nothing to stop you or I opening a gym in the town so there is nothing to stop the club doing so. Owned and operated by the club as a subsidised service for the squad but also ran as a standalone enterprise with all money going back into the club. Taxi's, catering establishments, whatever can all follow suit.

It's no good bemoaning the extra 1500 people who watched the culmination of the Conference season as times have changed in that ten years. We need to be brave and embrace an entire new way of operating where the gate money is not king.

Tom D 03-03-2016 18:34

Re: Sorry, Mr Burgess - still "tinpot"
 
Particularly like the gym idea. Surely should be accommodated into any development plans for the stands.

Of course with a really excellent bar/food area :)

deeayess 03-03-2016 18:55

Re: Sorry, Mr Burgess - still "tinpot"
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by maccawozzagod (Post 1162930)
with regards to income and how best to generate it, I would suggest that our club WILL always struggle to make ends meet through the gates. One thing I suggested to Mr Marsden when he took the Chair was that we absolutely must learn the lessons of history and this club is doomed to always be the underdog. Does that mean we give up? Absolutely not, but we need to devise ways around it.

How many people get a taxi or bus to the ground? we need to be taking that money. Stan Lee's Taxis?

How many pints do our fans drink on matchday in establishments other than ours? We need to be taking that money.

How many people buy food on matchdays from establishments other than ours? We need that money

How many people have gym memberships? we need to be taking that money and it would also be a place for our players to go.

The last comment is a crucial one for me. It's not just the gym idea, there are others. But something that the club may spend money could be turned into a business idea under our clubs umbrella. The club premises do not need to stop at Livingstone Road. We absolutely could have Stan Lee's Gym. There is nothing to stop you or I opening a gym in the town so there is nothing to stop the club doing so. Owned and operated by the club as a subsidised service for the squad but also ran as a standalone enterprise with all money going back into the club. Taxi's, catering establishments, whatever can all follow suit.

It's no good bemoaning the extra 1500 people who watched the culmination of the Conference season as times have changed in that ten years. We need to be brave and embrace an entire new way of operating where the gate money is not king.

While I agree with the sentiment I would suggest the logistics would not make it worthwhile other than the gym.

Taxis, food and drink would be restricted to a very small window once a week on average and probably only cover a couple of hours before and maybe an hour after if that.

People in general are creatures of habit and will drink in their usual pub, get the first taxi they can and if they choose food will expect it quickly.

Does the Crown make much of a profit over a week and would it take as much if there was an alternative?

Big away supports usually mean those horrible plastic glasses so another reason to go elsewhere away from the ground.

At the moment those ideas would be too risky for set up costs and staff unless you were going to run them full time and would it be wise to try to compete with existing businesses?

I can't honestly thing of alternatives that would generate significant revenue based on the size of our support and I would also be cautious about not having a back up plan because promotion is by no means a certainty. Chickens and hatched spring to mind.

maccawozzagod 03-03-2016 18:55

Re: Sorry, Mr Burgess - still "tinpot"
 
well that's kinda the idea Tom, anything that would be incorporated into a new build stadium in order to generate revenue, could be just made anyway but in more relevant locations.

On the subject of a new stand, I sincerely hope the plans aren't particularly grand. In all honesty the Whinney Hill stand would not be used outside of match hours purely because of its location. The clubhouse has toyed with being a licensed premise mid week in the past, but down to its location was not used at all. The Whinney Hill stand would be even further off the beaten path as you'd have to walk all around the ground to get in.

mab 03-03-2016 18:58

Re: Sorry, Mr Burgess - still "tinpot"
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Tom D (Post 1162926)
Wasn't aware of this mab! Any idea what the percentage is?

Sorry haven't a clue,MrT might be able to shed some light on this if he's allowed too. :)

maccawozzagod 03-03-2016 19:16

Re: Sorry, Mr Burgess - still "tinpot"
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by deeayess (Post 1162933)
Taxis, food and drink would be restricted to a very small window once a week on average and probably only cover a couple of hours before and maybe an hour after if that.

People in general are creatures of habit and will drink in their usual pub, get the first taxi they can and if they choose food will expect it quickly.

Does the Crown make much of a profit over a week and would it take as much if there was an alternative?


They dont have to be exclusive to a matchday though Duncan. Taxi's for example, Yes they would have exclusive rights to ferry people away from the ground (away fans @ £5 to the train station), but they would operate 7 days a week and be advertising our name. Buses, Specifically to bring in the people from Clitheroe or Darwen or Haslingden. Not profit making on their own but it would bring 30 people to the ground earlier, and stop later thus incurring its own profit. They too could then be put to use for other things such as the academy, do we spend money on transport during training? they could also bid for school contracts as well.

As far as pubs or catering establishments are concerned, yes they would be competing with other businesses. As I said, there's nothing to stop you or me from opening a competing business so there's nothing other than goodwill to stop Stanley from doing it. Why not take over a failing town centre pub? It doesn't necessarily mean that it will fail under our banner but it becomes another town centre establishment where tickets and information can be obtained. It could also be put to use for conferencing type meetings in the mornings. It could also become a main town centre meeting point prior to Stan Lee Buses ferrying you all up to The Crown. A catering business (or the pub itself) can supply better food for the Corporate dining, it could supply food for the Stan Lee owned burger bars on the ground and any waste could be put to use the following day rather than just becoming a statistic on the loss ledger.

For me, it's not necessarily The blueprint for how our club can prosper, but rather an outloud thought about how we need to think outside of the box.

But I will run with it and expand on how the conversation would go at Board level.

"Accyweb, Macca come up with an idea about how we should buy up all the town centre businesses and compete with others"
"it'd cost a fortune and upset some of our sponsors"
"drop the idea?
"yep"

If upsetting some sponsors really is a consideration then we could find ways of working with them rather than against them. For example with the taxis, Max Cabs would charge £2.50 to the train station and I personally would aim for a fiver with away fans who would be the prime target. Max get exclusive rights and keep the £2.50. We get £2.50 for doing nowt. Max put our sticker on their cars and pay us for the privilege, we push their rank above all others (fans need to join in the push).

Another pub wouldn't harm the other pubs in the slightest, the lack of pubs means a worse nightlife thus less people go out.

Lancashire Life has a list of restaurants in the county that offer fine dining - there are no listings for Accrington at all.

Ilyas Khan had the idea that a new ground could incorporate a hotel (can't see itself meself), does Accrington need a hotel? Well let's build it under the Stanley name. We instantly don't need to spend money on putting new players up and we can earn money. Yes Travelodge have the brand name that would bring its own customers in anyway, but we have 23 opportunities a year to fill the rooms to away fans.

None of these ideas are necessarily the best ones, merely examples. Stanley could (in theory) rebuild the town all by itself regardless of what help the council could offer.

Where does the money come from? Any money put into the Crown Ground could in theory be wasted money. Whinney Hill stand does not need to be built, £660,000 could quite easily be invested into a handful of ideas that are collective nous could be brought to bear upon. Small businesses often don't appear fruitful for a long time as the owner can't invest enough money into it to get it off the ground at the right speed, it has to be done slowly and organicly, reinvesting profits rather than drawing wages. We in thoery could throw money at things to get them going right away and at the desired level of profit.

King Kev 03-03-2016 19:58

Re: Sorry, Mr Burgess - still "tinpot"
 
Well King Kev, you have obviously read the emails I have exchanged with the MD, you must have listened to the phone calls I have had with the MD. I can assure you I need no lessons of how to bring a club or myself into the modern world. Your patronising ignorant observations are just that. Have you seen our average gates? definitely no where near enough. I may have known the MD for a very short time but I judge people by deeds not just words. If you have not noticed I have not mentioned the MD for best part of a week but I knew somebody would. You suggest I have made my comments for selfish reasons!!!!!!!!! There is a world of difference between principle and selfish. The removal of the disabled concession without any warning or consultation. we then are told we are going cahless at the turnstiles for safety reasons. OK but why no option to purchase tickets on line? shows there is no infrastructure in place yet, we are met with people including the MD selling tickets in a pergola and taking cash. a bit bewildering I think, hardly the professional face we wish to show to the world.
I hope the MD has the nounce to know when he has got it wrong. Why not run his ideas past us in the supporters club at least? we are all supposed to be on the same side. I won't revisit old ground but I will not be eating humble pie. And just for the record I have done my share to help this club stay afloat, I want this club to move on to bigger and better things. I believe Andy Holt is the man with the vision and finance to do this. I don't think the new MD is the man to fulfil this ambition, As for trying to get more supporters through the gates, I suggest that perhaps yourself and the new MD go out in Hyndburn and encourage the Asian population to come as they make up a fair percentage of the community. But spouting the arrogant nonsense based on hear say is more likely to put people off. I am aware that the club needs to be put on a more commercial footing with enough revenue to progress. I think if you were to read my post's you will note where I have complained I have tried to offer a solution. I don't recall reading any posts from you. But whatever you or I think, we can't seem to raise our base attendance above 14/1500 excluding away fans. That is a serious problem that the club and fans need to address. we need to pull together not put fans off. I noticed you singled me out for criticism maybe the truth is getting through. A true supporter is a friend of the club and will speak out if they see things that need attention, keeping quiet helps nobody.
================================================== ================================================== =====================
One doesn’t need to read any exchange you may or may not have had with the MD, as your clear attack on a public forum says more about you than anyone else. One assumes the MD, has been brought in to the club by Andy Holt, the person you show so much support for, somewhat beggars believe. It matters not at this point in time if you or I are correct. Given the history of the club, Andy Holt pays his money and takes his choice (I assume) and in this case, he has installed a MD, I respectfully suggest everybody starts giving him a chance.

Your comment “I hope the MD has the nounce to know when he has got it wrong” you really don’t have an ounce of commercial sense, do you? The only time you will be happy is if every idea is run passed your personally and you rubber stamp it. Get a grip, the world moves at a very fast pace and commercial acumen these days, is just that, think on your feet and make decision quickly to react to situations as they arise and the key is to ensure that when you make those decisions the strategy is without loss. I don’t see any loss to date, apart from your credibility.

Although the key to my post was not lost on you was it? You just couldn’t resist raising the “disabled concessions” hence my comment selfish reasons. You are so transparent.

Don’t bother replying, as I have no intention of further debating with someone who has such a personnel insulin view of the current circumstances and as for humble Pie, you may wish to start licking your lips, as it won’t be too long before it’s been served. Tick Tock…..Tick Tock….

deeayess 03-03-2016 19:59

Re: Sorry, Mr Burgess - still "tinpot"
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by maccawozzagod (Post 1162939)
They dont have to be exclusive to a matchday though Duncan. Taxi's for example, Yes they would have exclusive rights to ferry people away from the ground (away fans @ £5 to the train station), but they would operate 7 days a week and be advertising our name. Buses, Specifically to bring in the people from Clitheroe or Darwen or Haslingden. Not profit making on their own but it would bring 30 people to the ground earlier, and stop later thus incurring its own profit. They too could then be put to use for other things such as the academy, do we spend money on transport during training? they could also bid for school contracts as well.

As far as pubs or catering establishments are concerned, yes they would be competing with other businesses. As I said, there's nothing to stop you or me from opening a competing business so there's nothing other than goodwill to stop Stanley from doing it. Why not take over a failing town centre pub? It doesn't necessarily mean that it will fail under our banner but it becomes another town centre establishment where tickets and information can be obtained. It could also be put to use for conferencing type meetings in the mornings. It could also become a main town centre meeting point prior to Stan Lee Buses ferrying you all up to The Crown. A catering business (or the pub itself) can supply better food for the Corporate dining, it could supply food for the Stan Lee owned burger bars on the ground and any waste could be put to use the following day rather than just becoming a statistic on the loss ledger.

For me, it's not necessarily The blueprint for how our club can prosper, but rather an outloud thought about how we need to think outside of the box.

But I will run with it and expand on how the conversation would go at Board level.

"Accyweb, Macca come up with an idea about how we should buy up all the town centre businesses and compete with others"
"it'd cost a fortune and upset some of our sponsors"
"drop the idea?
"yep"

If upsetting some sponsors really is a consideration then we could find ways of working with them rather than against them. For example with the taxis, Max Cabs would charge £2.50 to the train station and I personally would aim for a fiver with away fans who would be the prime target. Max get exclusive rights and keep the £2.50. We get £2.50 for doing nowt. Max put our sticker on their cars and pay us for the privilege, we push their rank above all others (fans need to join in the push).

Another pub wouldn't harm the other pubs in the slightest, the lack of pubs means a worse nightlife thus less people go out.

Lancashire Life has a list of restaurants in the county that offer fine dining - there are no listings for Accrington at all.

Ilyas Khan had the idea that a new ground could incorporate a hotel (can't see itself meself), does Accrington need a hotel? Well let's build it under the Stanley name. We instantly don't need to spend money on putting new players up and we can earn money. Yes Travelodge have the brand name that would bring its own customers in anyway, but we have 23 opportunities a year to fill the rooms to away fans.

None of these ideas are necessarily the best ones, merely examples. Stanley could (in theory) rebuild the town all by itself regardless of what help the council could offer.

Where does the money come from? Any money put into the Crown Ground could in theory be wasted money. Whinney Hill stand does not need to be built, £660,000 could quite easily be invested into a handful of ideas that are collective nous could be brought to bear upon. Small businesses often don't appear fruitful for a long time as the owner can't invest enough money into it to get it off the ground at the right speed, it has to be done slowly and organicly, reinvesting profits rather than drawing wages. We in thoery could throw money at things to get them going right away and at the desired level of profit.

I admire your optimism and get up and go however I'm not convinced with the business plan. You are right regarding £2.50 for Max Taxis and to be honest if they thought there was money to be made they would be trying it. Af for them paying £2.50 to get a £2.50 fare, they would be no worse not doing it.

I agree the bus service is rubbish after the game to catch the trains around half five and with government subsidies being cut down there buses could be a lot fewer and far between. Trading on the Stanley name probably wouldn't bear much fruit as there seems to be apathy around the town more than anything else.

The problem with pubs and restauraunts is the set up costs and if rented or mortgaged having to make the rent/mortgage first then a profit.

I certainly wouldn't dismiss your ideas out of hand but it would be interesting to see the costings. It is an unfortunate fact of life many small businesses struggle these days and I have had some experience of that with my step daughter who, some years ago wanted to open a small clothes shop in Dumfries. I went through the costings with her looked at potential income and expenditure including various things she hadn't thought of and it just didn't look viable especially since it was announced a Debenhams was about to open nearby.

She decided to give it a go and my wife and I helped when we could but ultimately it wasn't viable and she got out before losing any serious money and the experience did help but that was very small scale. The scale you are looking at would require major investment in terms of what we have and may need to be long term to be viable.

I agree about the new stand, it would probably be a bit of a white elephant most of the time due to location and will the nearby residents be a problem re planning permission?

deeayess 03-03-2016 20:01

Re: Sorry, Mr Burgess - still "tinpot"
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by King Kev (Post 1162942)
Well King Kev, you have obviously read the emails I have exchanged with the MD, you must have listened to the phone calls I have had with the MD. I can assure you I need no lessons of how to bring a club or myself into the modern world. Your patronising ignorant observations are just that. Have you seen our average gates? definitely no where near enough. I may have known the MD for a very short time but I judge people by deeds not just words. If you have not noticed I have not mentioned the MD for best part of a week but I knew somebody would. You suggest I have made my comments for selfish reasons!!!!!!!!! There is a world of difference between principle and selfish. The removal of the disabled concession without any warning or consultation. we then are told we are going cahless at the turnstiles for safety reasons. OK but why no option to purchase tickets on line? shows there is no infrastructure in place yet, we are met with people including the MD selling tickets in a pergola and taking cash. a bit bewildering I think, hardly the professional face we wish to show to the world.
I hope the MD has the nounce to know when he has got it wrong. Why not run his ideas past us in the supporters club at least? we are all supposed to be on the same side. I won't revisit old ground but I will not be eating humble pie. And just for the record I have done my share to help this club stay afloat, I want this club to move on to bigger and better things. I believe Andy Holt is the man with the vision and finance to do this. I don't think the new MD is the man to fulfil this ambition, As for trying to get more supporters through the gates, I suggest that perhaps yourself and the new MD go out in Hyndburn and encourage the Asian population to come as they make up a fair percentage of the community. But spouting the arrogant nonsense based on hear say is more likely to put people off. I am aware that the club needs to be put on a more commercial footing with enough revenue to progress. I think if you were to read my post's you will note where I have complained I have tried to offer a solution. I don't recall reading any posts from you. But whatever you or I think, we can't seem to raise our base attendance above 14/1500 excluding away fans. That is a serious problem that the club and fans need to address. we need to pull together not put fans off. I noticed you singled me out for criticism maybe the truth is getting through. A true supporter is a friend of the club and will speak out if they see things that need attention, keeping quiet helps nobody.
================================================== ================================================== =====================
One doesn’t need to read any exchange you may or may not have had with the MD, as your clear attack on a public forum says more about you than anyone else. One assumes the MD, has been brought in to the club by Andy Holt, the person you show so much support for, somewhat beggars believe. It matters not at this point in time if you or I are correct. Given the history of the club, Andy Holt pays his money and takes his choice (I assume) and in this case, he has installed a MD, I respectfully suggest everybody starts giving him a chance.

Your comment “I hope the MD has the nounce to know when he has got it wrong” you really don’t have an ounce of commercial sense, do you? The only time you will be happy is if every idea is run passed your personally and you rubber stamp it. Get a grip, the world moves at a very fast pace and commercial acumen these days, is just that, think on your feet and make decision quickly to react to situations as they arise and the key is to ensure that when you make those decisions the strategy is without loss. I don’t see any loss to date, apart from your credibility.

Although the key to my post was not lost on you was it? You just couldn’t resist raising the “disabled concessions” hence my comment selfish reasons. You are so transparent.

Don’t bother replying, as I have no intention of further debating with someone who has such a personnel insulin view of the current circumstances and as for humble Pie, you may wish to start licking your lips, as it won’t be too long before it’s been served. Tick Tock…..Tick Tock….

Yep, it's the MD :D

cashman 03-03-2016 20:13

Re: Sorry, Mr Burgess - still "tinpot"
 
The transparency on here is KING KEV.:rolleyes:

maccawozzagod 03-03-2016 20:22

Re: Sorry, Mr Burgess - still "tinpot"
 
what we should have, as a club, is a collective acumen that would enable us to establish good and viable business plans for a whole plethora of different businesses. If you couple that with, in theory, enough cash to throw at something to ensure it is self sufficient, then there is no reason why any differnt number of propositions couldn't turn a Red and White profit.

The example of the gym. Not including that it would have benefits for the footballing squad and saving the club some money in the process .... If I was to open a gym I would have the bare bones of finance in order to try to make it succeed. I've no idea how much money would be involved but let's say I put £10k into it. The amount of kit would be pitiful and any marketing would be lost as first timers would come, sneer, and never come again (a bit like they do at The Crown). Sure I'd have friends and family and the occasional loners but it wouldn't cut the mustard. Now if I had say, 3 or 4 business mentors plus £30k it would open in a blaze of positivity and it would be far harder to fail with.

deeayess 03-03-2016 20:43

Re: Sorry, Mr Burgess - still "tinpot"
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by maccawozzagod (Post 1162950)
what we should have, as a club, is a collective acumen that would enable us to establish good and viable business plans for a whole plethora of different businesses. If you couple that with, in theory, enough cash to throw at something to ensure it is self sufficient, then there is no reason why any differnt number of propositions couldn't turn a Red and White profit.

The example of the gym. Not including that it would have benefits for the footballing squad and saving the club some money in the process .... If I was to open a gym I would have the bare bones of finance in order to try to make it succeed. I've no idea how much money would be involved but let's say I put £10k into it. The amount of kit would be pitiful and any marketing would be lost as first timers would come, sneer, and never come again (a bit like they do at The Crown). Sure I'd have friends and family and the occasional loners but it wouldn't cut the mustard. Now if I had say, 3 or 4 business mentors plus £30k it would open in a blaze of positivity and it would be far harder to fail with.

I've given you the gym. That sounds like it could be viable from a low cost base and minimal start up, in the grand scheme of things, if you are using the ground as a base.

I'm sure there are many fans with varying skills who could assist the club but that would require a driving force who could unite the fans and that is where it becomes harder but something has to be tried to create a viable source of income long term.

Chewbacca 03-03-2016 21:59

Re: Sorry, Mr Burgess - still "tinpot"
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Tom D (Post 1162926)
Wasn't aware of this mab! Any idea what the percentage is?

5% so about £1 a ticket, and looking at away games and advanced sales it is probably not worth the admin and the staff time selling them (at our end).

This does not apply to Play-off games and of course cups games, normal league programme only.

baldy 04-03-2016 07:47

Re: Sorry, Mr Burgess - still "tinpot"
 
Why can't the gym be at the stadium? How many people drive to other gyms (Sports Centre) etc. Plus the location of the ground is surrounded by houses already, not like a stadium on an industrial estate like some of the new builds we see!

What if the new stand had catering facilities, something that we've never had before, Again loads of houses in the area that we could attract, People that wouldn't normally go to the games but would go for food midweek and spend £20 is better than no money at all!

I think a bar serving food during the week and on match days would be a great idea but would be all down to pricing, most people in Accrington don't want fine dining so just needs something cheap and cheerful and for the price to be right...2 4 1 deals or Season ticket holders get 10% off during the week etc!

monkey hanger 04-03-2016 08:14

Re: Sorry, Mr Burgess - still "tinpot"
 
all good ideas are gyms new eating outlets etc. but the cost would be prohibited. open and fail that's more money the club has lost. anyone on here has any money making schemes or ideas that won,t cost a fortune let us know. what do other small town clubs do to increase their revenue. I for one don,t have any answers but I,m sure someone may have.

cashman 04-03-2016 08:19

Re: Sorry, Mr Burgess - still "tinpot"
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by cashman (Post 1162948)
The transparency on here is KING KEV.:rolleyes:

I reckon our Moderater should explain this situation, having checked this King Kev out, its found that the post is coming from the same server MrT uses. So it must be either him or another, I would hate for it to be discovered that it our Mod, cos we all know a BAN is correct for using 2 Identities.So MrT whats the score?

Red-Osbornello 04-03-2016 08:26

Re: Sorry, Mr Burgess - still "tinpot"
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by cashman (Post 1163011)
having checked this King Kev out, its found that the post is coming from the same server MrT uses.

How exactly have you found out what "server" he's posting from?

Revived Red 04-03-2016 08:44

Re: Sorry, Mr Burgess - still "tinpot"
 
Well this has indeed turned into an interesting thread. It has certainly evoked a huge amount of comment.

However .....

my original point remains unanswered. There are STILL no season ticket application forms online - and it is now three weeks since we were told that they would be.

I must say here that I have no doubt whatsoever that the reason for their absence is NOT the fault of Dan and Dany who do a great job. I am sure that the fault lies elsewhere.

It could be, of course, that someone at the club thinks there are so few "casual long-distance attendees" that it is not worth putting these application forms online.

I still have not yet met Mr Burgess and have had no direct dealings with him so I cannot comment on the personal failings which others have mentioned. What is clear to me, however, is that he has little knowledge about how to manage change.

cashman 04-03-2016 08:45

Re: Sorry, Mr Burgess - still "tinpot"
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Red-Osbornello (Post 1163014)
How exactly have you found out what "server" he's posting from?

Nothing to do wi you.

King Kev 04-03-2016 08:45

Re: Sorry, Mr Burgess - still "tinpot"
 
My god some of you fans are really concerned about a first time poster who dares to offer a contrarian view.
=====================
Cashman wrote:
I reckon our Moderater should explain this situation, having checked this King Kev out, its found that the post is coming from the same server MrT uses. So it must be either him or another, I would hate for it to be discovered that it our Mod, cos we all know a BAN is correct for using 2 Identities.So MrT whats the score?

=========================

Considering I posted via BT/AOL server and over a 100 miles distance from Accrington when I have posted on both occasions, your claim is total incorrect and unfounded and clearly know as much about IT, as you do about running a football club.

Yet, another poster who has lost any credibility he may have had. I think we are starting to see the real issues in this club...

Maybe you need to start getting your appetite up, I sense I will be sending you a larger portion of humble pie too. Blimey this could cost me?

Anybody else there who would like to go on the list for a serving of humble pie?

cashman 04-03-2016 08:47

Re: Sorry, Mr Burgess - still "tinpot"
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by King Kev (Post 1163020)
My god some of you fans are really concerned about a first time poster who dares to offer a contrarian view.
=====================
Cashman wrote:
I reckon our Moderater should explain this situation, having checked this King Kev out, its found that the post is coming from the same server MrT uses. So it must be either him or another, I would hate for it to be discovered that it our Mod, cos we all know a BAN is correct for using 2 Identities.So MrT whats the score?

=========================

Considering I posted via BT/AOL server and over a 100 miles distance from Accrington when I have posted on both occasions, your claim is total incorrect and unfounded and clearly know as much about IT, as you do about running a football club.

Yet, another poster who has lost any credibility he may have had. I think we are starting to see the real issues in this club...

Maybe you need to start getting your appetite up, I sense I will be sending you a larger portion of humble pie too. Blimey this could cost me?

Anybody else there who would like to go on the list for a serving of humble pie?

No it is not incorrect i have had it checked by someone qualified to do so, so i must add liar to the list.

Red-Osbornello 04-03-2016 08:59

Re: Sorry, Mr Burgess - still "tinpot"
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by cashman (Post 1163021)
No it is not incorrect i have had it checked by someone qualified to do so, so i must add liar to the list.

You don't half talk some tripe Cashy. :rolleyes:

Tom D 04-03-2016 09:25

Re: Sorry, Mr Burgess - still "tinpot"
 
Can you prove that you are not King Kev, Cashman?

baldy 04-03-2016 09:51

Re: Sorry, Mr Burgess - still "tinpot"
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by cashman (Post 1163019)
Nothing to do wi you.

Hahahaha, Typical Cashman, Makes an accusation/argument but when asked to back it up fails yet again to provide proof!

King Kev 04-03-2016 09:58

Re: Sorry, Mr Burgess - still "tinpot"
 
Let me set the record straight to avoid peole wasting their time.

I only have one ID on this forum. I am not any other poster in disguise.

But crack on Cashman, you are quite a funny man. It appears your are are known for making statements without the ability to back them up.

Credability? thinking about it, I dont think you had any to lose.

King Kev 04-03-2016 10:22

Re: Sorry, Mr Burgess - still "tinpot"
 
O' cashman, this what you say about yourself....

About cashman Biographyeducated at accy tech,open minded always looking for opportunities,cynical with odd sense of humour,also completely useless with computers lol===========


Open minded? I haven't seen that.
Always looking for opportunties? Fancy the MD role? ha ha
Odd sense of Humour? Well cant argue with that!!


and the best one of all................


Completely useless with computers..


Well, I have to say thats about the most factual comment you have made and you have shown to backit up as well....


Back to school for you I think....


:hehetable

baldy 04-03-2016 10:49

Re: Sorry, Mr Burgess - still "tinpot"
 
King Kev, You missed the bit where he lets people know they're "Clowns" if you don't agree with his logic!

Chrisr 04-03-2016 11:02

Re: Sorry, Mr Burgess - still "tinpot"
 
Just ignore them Cashy, There ideas have been discussed and some discounted I will give them credit for trying to come up with ideas, If king Kev or whoever he claims to be had a little more nounce he may have addressed all my points in my post's. However I knew he couldn't and he would take the bait to expose his real intentions, I would bet he does not even realise how he did it, He has never recognised any idea I have put forward. As for business acumen and thinking on my feet, you don't even know where to start, You know absolutely nothing about me, my knowledge or experience. In fact much of what you spout on here is second hand hear say, The problems facing the club can be over come. Baldy made a comment on dining facilities open during the week where the club may take £20 which is better than nothing, But laughs like you Kev at the thought of a reduced price concession for the disabled even though that would be a guaranteed £160 up front, + draw ticket sales+ programme+ catering. soon starts to add up but hey you boys are so clever you must have worked that out. NOT, business acumen eh, Go ticketless and no infrastructure in place to buy your ticket on line, cashless turnstiles for safety, buy your ticket with cash from an unguarded pergola, wonderful planning. Don't tell me I know nothing about commercial business, You and people like you have made the club a laughing stock. you are dragging the club down. As for withdrawing the concession I have not pursued this matter any further on this forum. but a certain person has, I wonder why? But as far as I am concerned I will sit back and see this season out. I wish the club every success and Andy Holt in particular. If it was not for his finance during the last bout of bad weather I fear the gates would have closed, For that support I thank him. If you are the type of small minded people involved in running the club then I shall no longer attend.

cashman 04-03-2016 11:09

Re: Sorry, Mr Burgess - still "tinpot"
 
If these so called clever beggars knew how the forum actually worked they could easily check things for themselves, what i said was accurate and can easily be checked, but if they are too stupid to do so, then i couldn't care less.:rolleyes: They both use the same AOL server FACT.

cashman 04-03-2016 11:19

Re: Sorry, Mr Burgess - still "tinpot"
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by King Kev (Post 1163031)


and the best one of all................


Completely useless with computers..


Well, I have to say thats about the most factual comment you have made and you have shown to backit up as well....


Back to school for you I think....


:hehetable

That is a fact i am useless with computers, I dont tell lies unlike you, If you learn to read correctly i said i got someone who is qualified to check for me, selective reading or what? I now can understand why i have been told by people in clitheroe, they were glad to see the back of you.;)

yerself 04-03-2016 11:30

Re: Sorry, Mr Burgess - still "tinpot"
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by King Kev
debating with someone who has such a personnel insulin view

Chrisr never mentioned anything about the staff suffering from diabetes.:rolleyes:

Red-Osbornello 04-03-2016 11:33

Re: Sorry, Mr Burgess - still "tinpot"
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by cashman (Post 1163035)
If these so called clever beggars knew how the forum actually worked they could easily check things for themselves, what i said was accurate and can easily be checked, but if they are too stupid to do so, then i couldn't care less.:rolleyes: They both use the same AOL server FACT.

As someone who understands what servers are, and what they do, I'm just curious as to the process your qualified forum ninja used to check the server location of the individual posts?

Quote:

Originally Posted by cashman (Post 1163036)
i said i got someone who is qualified to check for me

Again, just out of curiosity, what is this person qualified in exactly? Also, does this person have a name?

I assume that this is just another Cashman trolling process used as a lure to fish for responses. :cool: I miss Malcolm.

King Kev 04-03-2016 11:45

Re: Sorry, Mr Burgess - still "tinpot"
 
Cashman,

You just dont get it do you? AOL, browsers are different operating systems. thats why they appear to come from the same source.

Come on do some research, but alternatively, keep on spouting, maybe you should consider changing your username to Uninformed, ha ha.

I guess the Circus must be in town, and a Clown has gone missing...

cashman 04-03-2016 11:51

Re: Sorry, Mr Burgess - still "tinpot"
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Red-Osbornello (Post 1163038)
As someone who understands what servers are, and what they do, I'm just curious as to the process your qualified forum ninja used to check the server location of the individual posts?



Again, just out of curiosity, what is this person qualified in exactly? Also, does this person have a name?

I assume that this is just another Cashman trolling process used as a lure to fish for responses. :cool: I miss Malcolm.

Read the site rules thicko, yeh will see who it was and why i aint posting the name, or is that too difficult?:rolleyes:

Red-Osbornello 04-03-2016 12:09

Re: Sorry, Mr Burgess - still "tinpot"
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by cashman (Post 1163042)
Read the site rules thicko, yeh will see who it was and why i aint posting the name, or is that too difficult?:rolleyes:

Just read the rules my good man (no need to resort to name calling). I've checked both rules threads I could find, as well as the privacy policy and there's nothing in there about servers - probably because what you're talking about is nonsense as people don't "post from servers".

Though there is something about IP addresses and AW collecting location data, browser type etc. which is interesting. That would suggest that, if this is true, your friend is a high ranking member of the forum? If that's the case, and they've shared some location info with you - that could be seen as a pretty serious breach of the data protection act! That's the sort of thing that sees websites shut down. Is that the case?

cashman 04-03-2016 12:26

Re: Sorry, Mr Burgess - still "tinpot"
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Red-Osbornello (Post 1163043)
Just read the rules my good man (no need to resort to name calling). I've checked both rules threads I could find, as well as the privacy policy and there's nothing in there about servers - probably because what you're talking about is nonsense as people don't "post from servers".

Though there is something about IP addresses and AW collecting location data, browser type etc. which is interesting. That would suggest that, if this is true, your friend is a high ranking member of the forum? If that's the case, and they've shared some location info with you - that could be seen as a pretty serious breach of the data protection act! That's the sort of thing that sees websites shut down. Is that the case?

So calling me a troll aint name calling?in my book it is so i will call yeh whatever i wish as i never did particularly like yeh anyway.:rolleyes: anyway i wont call yeh again if it upsets yeh i will just ignore yeh ok.

Red-Osbornello 04-03-2016 12:28

Re: Sorry, Mr Burgess - still "tinpot"
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by cashman (Post 1163045)
So calling me a troll aint name calling?in my book it is so i will call yeh whatever i wish as i never did particularly like yeh anyway.:rolleyes: anyway i wont call yeh again if it upsets yeh i will just ignore yeh ok.

Fair point, haha!

Don't ignore me Cashy, I'd have to get some work done. :p

cashman 04-03-2016 12:39

Re: Sorry, Mr Burgess - still "tinpot"
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Red-Osbornello (Post 1163046)
Fair point, haha!

Don't ignore me Cashy, I'd have to get some work done. :p

Well cant have that.:D

deeayess 04-03-2016 13:37

Re: Sorry, Mr Burgess - still "tinpot"
 
I would hazard a guess that it is the IP address as these are all logged with the moderators so it is perhaps unfair to disguise the fact that the poster in question and the moderator post from the same IP address if true because the person making the statement doesn't know the difference between an IP address and server.

As to data protection, it is unlikely that the act has been breached as, on the face of it, no personal data has been divulged. I could tell you that my wife and I post from the same computer therefore will have the same IP address but all that tells you is I am daft for letting the wife near my computer it does not disclose any personal data.

What it may be is a breach of ethics on this forum by a moderator. The simple solution to the argument would be for people to report it to a moderator and they can deal with the whole situation as they see fit.

I rate King Kev's opinion as highly as I do Dav0's but that doesn't mean he hasn't the right to post it as long as it isn't illegal or misleading. He can do likewise with me if he wants.

King Kev 04-03-2016 15:14

Re: Sorry, Mr Burgess - still "tinpot"
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by cashman (Post 1163036)
That is a fact i am useless with computers, I dont tell lies unlike you, If you learn to read correctly i said i got someone who is qualified to check for me, selective reading or what? I now can understand why i have been told by people in clitheroe, they were glad to see the back of you.;)

============

O' cashman, Maybe you could do me the honour of explaining what Clithero has got to do with me?

maccawozzagod 04-03-2016 15:35

Re: Sorry, Mr Burgess - still "tinpot"
 
Yet again the same old names bring a thread to its knees. Close it down Mr T, and while you're at it close this section of Accy Web. Its nowt but a soapbox for certain people to feel important from.

andyd 04-03-2016 16:01

Re: Sorry, Mr Burgess - still "tinpot"
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by maccawozzagod (Post 1163062)
Yet again the same old names bring a thread to its knees. Close it down Mr T, and while you're at it close this section of Accy Web. Its nowt but a soapbox for certain people to feel important from.

Well said Russ sick of hearing em me self.

yonmon 04-03-2016 18:15

Re: Sorry, Mr Burgess - still "tinpot"
 
You
Quote:

Originally Posted by King Kev (Post 1163041)
Cashman,

You just dont get it do you? AOL, browsers are different operating systems. thats why they appear to come from the same source.

Come on do some research, but alternatively, keep on spouting, maybe you should consider changing your username to Uninformed, ha ha.

I guess the Circus must be in town, and a Clown has gone missing...

KK... I have always understood that there is no place whatsoever on OUR Forum for posts which are designed to criticise and belittle other fans of our team, and to single out and name one of these is shameful.
It seems that both of these elements exist in this sneering post of yours. and outline qualities in your appreciation of what is expected of Forum users which leave much to be desired.
It would also suggest from it's tone of self conceit that you see yourself as being superior to
the rest of us !....which, I can assure you, is most definitely not the case !.

Must do better !!.

Maybe this thread has outlived it's usefulness and should follow many other's of its ilk into oblivion ...wonder if our esteemed Moderator feels the same ?.

Revived Red 04-03-2016 18:41

Re: Sorry, Mr Burgess - still "tinpot"
 
Well I started the thread. My original point remains unanswered so I have to agree that it should be closed.

cashman 04-03-2016 18:51

Re: Sorry, Mr Burgess - still "tinpot"
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by yonmon (Post 1163072)
You

KK... I have always understood that there is no place whatsoever on OUR Forum for posts which are designed to criticise and belittle other fans of our team, and to single out and name one of these is shameful.
It seems that both of these elements exist in this sneering post of yours. and outline qualities in your appreciation of what is expected of Forum users which leave much to be desired.
It would also suggest from it's tone of self conceit that you see yourself as being superior to
the rest of us !....which, I can assure you, is most definitely not the case !.

Must do better !!.

Maybe this thread has outlived it's usefulness and should follow many other's of its ilk into oblivion ...wonder if our esteemed Moderator feels the same ?.

Cheers yonmon, but i aint bothered in the slightest what he or anyone says, football is all about opinions unless of coarse they happen to be mine.:D Our esteemed moderator can easily put the matter to bed, by making a clear statement that King Kev is not him, nor is it anyone connected to the club, but i aint holding my breath wi that.;) it also seems to me Macca has now got some power seeing he wants this section closing down, The fact that the site belongs to a stanley supporter is of no relevance to him it seems? In fact he asks MrT to close it down, well as far as i'm aware a mod can only close a thread not close the site, but power can be a funny old thing.:rolleyes:

deeayess 04-03-2016 19:24

Re: Sorry, Mr Burgess - still "tinpot"
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Revived Red (Post 1163075)
Well I started the thread. My original point remains unanswered so I have to agree that it should be closed.

They may have answered it in their own way. It now says "2016/17 season ticket and Loyalty Membership forms will be available from Monday 15th February from the Stanley Store, supporters club shop in Accrington market and Reception. Please note we can only accept payment via cash or cheque"

No mention of online. Not how we thought it would pan out I dare say.

yonmon 04-03-2016 19:32

Re: Sorry, Mr Burgess - still "tinpot"
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Revived Red (Post 1163075)
Well I started the thread. My original point remains unanswered so I have to agree that it should be closed.

Ooooops !... I forgot that you were quivering in anticipation of a sensible and comprehensive response to your query RR, but am glad that you too feel that your thread is possibly not serving the purpose for which it was intended .

At times, I am overwhelmed with disappointment with much of what appears on our Forum,
and apart from the occasional times when football at our club happens to be the subject of discussion, feel that much of the nebulous 'who knows what ' and ' who knows what the future holds' and worst of all 'who knows what about whom !', is as valuable as the information shared at the the knit and natter group at our local library !.

But this is merely the opinion of one, who has always looked for good opinions, good banter, good interrelationships between we who have Accrington Stanley's best interests at heart !.
and honest and good natured exchange of views whenever I have visited our Forum.

It seems that there has been a swing away from all this to lesser things...or of course I could be entirely wrong !.

Perhaps the feelings expressed by Mecca are not far from the truth !.

Tom D 04-03-2016 19:38

Re: Sorry, Mr Burgess - still "tinpot"
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by deeayess (Post 1163083)
They may have answered it in their own way. It now says "2016/17 season ticket and Loyalty Membership forms will be available from Monday 15th February from the Stanley Store, supporters club shop in Accrington market and Reception. Please note we can only accept payment via cash or cheque"

No mention of online. Not how we thought it would pan out I dare say.

Snap. I was just looking this evening and noticed the lack of text about online applications.

Can appreciate it must feel like a barrier to fans who live further away from the ground than a short commute. Although, there's always the option of sorting it out on matchdays.

deeayess 04-03-2016 19:52

Re: Sorry, Mr Burgess - still "tinpot"
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Tom D (Post 1163088)
Snap. I was just looking this evening and noticed the lack of text about online applications.

Can appreciate it must feel like a barrier to fans who live further away from the ground than a short commute. Although, there's always the option of sorting it out on matchdays.

Yes, that's what I would do if I were getting a season ticket however you would have thought it wouldn't be hard to create and upload a PDF file.

Mr T 04-03-2016 20:08

Re: Sorry, Mr Burgess - still "tinpot"
 
Cashy;

No idea what you are on about!!

I do have a personnel AOL e-mail address which is linked to Accyweb

I have no idea who King Kev is; I don't recognise that e-mail address.

Given the fact I haven't had internet access for most of today ( the Wi-FI has been poor whilst travelling.

IF somebody wants to do the moderating job; happy to step down NOW!!!!

I'll close this thread as requested!!

It's a good job we've got 50 points and safe!! What would we me moaning about if we'd only 50 points on the board??


All times are GMT. The time now is 14:16.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com