Accrington Web

Accrington Web (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/index.php)
-   Accrington Stanley (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f93/)
-   -   PLAY OFF LEG 2 Home v Wimbledon (0-1 First leg) (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f93/play-off-leg-2-home-v-wimbledon-0-1-first-leg-68281.html)

Chimer 19-05-2016 19:01

Re: PLAY OFF LEG 2 Home v Wimbledon (0-1 First leg)
 
I've not seen a centre-forward blown up that much since Paul Mullin left us, but I have to say I like the thought of having the Beast laying the ball off to Billy Kee once the Wombles release him 'cos he can't stay the pace in League 1 ....

Could be our next folk hero!!

Only joking - maybe!!

cashman 19-05-2016 19:05

Re: PLAY OFF LEG 2 Home v Wimbledon (0-1 First leg)
 
Hey he aint no mug thats fer sure the humungous get.

Mr Matthew 19-05-2016 19:11

Re: PLAY OFF LEG 2 Home v Wimbledon (0-1 First leg)
 
I personally blame McConville for last night!!!

Redraine 20-05-2016 03:15

Re: PLAY OFF LEG 2 Home v Wimbledon (0-1 First leg)
 
What's happened to te Guess the gate thread? I thought I heard Tha gate announced as 4600 but have only seen 3600 published anywhere
What was it, Mab?

lancsdave 20-05-2016 07:27

Re: PLAY OFF LEG 2 Home v Wimbledon (0-1 First leg)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Redraine (Post 1169164)
What's happened to te Guess the gate thread? I thought I heard Tha gate announced as 4600 but have only seen 3600 published anywhere
What was it, Mab?

Accrington Stanley ‏@ASFCofficial May 18
Attendance 3567 with 1067 from Wimbledon - thank you one and all!


I didn't hear the announcement but from what I gather they added the away fans to the total instead of including them in the total

JC4LAB 20-05-2016 08:05

Re: PLAY OFF LEG 2 Home v Wimbledon (0-1 First leg)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chimer (Post 1169146)
I've not seen a centre-forward blown up that much since Paul Mullin left us, but I have to say I like the thought of having the Beast laying the ball off to Billy Kee once the Wombles release him 'cos he can't stay the pace in League 1 ....

Could be our next folk hero!!

Only joking - maybe!!

Claytons pies would be happy with that signing

AccyMad 20-05-2016 08:44

Re: PLAY OFF LEG 2 Home v Wimbledon (0-1 First leg)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by lancsdave (Post 1169167)
Accrington Stanley ‏@ASFCofficial May 18
Attendance 3567 with 1067 from Wimbledon - thank you one and all!


I didn't hear the announcement but from what I gather they added the away fans to the total instead of including them in the total

Can understand the confusion - must've been difficult working in the dark :rolleyes: . . . . . . . . too soon, ok I'll get my coat :hidewall:

maccawozzagod 20-05-2016 18:11

Re: PLAY OFF LEG 2 Home v Wimbledon (0-1 First leg)
 
Thats a crap crowd, how on earth was it a sell out?

Lemur 20-05-2016 18:40

Re: PLAY OFF LEG 2 Home v Wimbledon (0-1 First leg)
 
if thats the case the crown ground does not hold 5000 then, i had a struggle to get back from the loo, to my spot on the clayton end.

Redraine 20-05-2016 18:40

Re: PLAY OFF LEG 2 Home v Wimbledon (0-1 First leg)
 
It looked close to a sell out from where I was sitting. Where is Mab when you want him? Someone must have guessed near the true figure!

lancsdave 20-05-2016 18:45

Re: PLAY OFF LEG 2 Home v Wimbledon (0-1 First leg)
 
Wimbledons allocation was 1700 so thats 700 off capacity to start with

DAV007 20-05-2016 22:37

Re: PLAY OFF LEG 2 Home v Wimbledon (0-1 First leg)
 
I thought Charles for Wimbledon was immense, he won everything.
He is way to good for league 2, Wimbledon did well getting him in on loan.

Outback Ozzy 20-05-2016 22:40

Re: PLAY OFF LEG 2 Home v Wimbledon (0-1 First leg)
 
If Wimbledon wanted 1700, why is it that FL rules state they could have up to 2,000 or 10% of capacity, which means they should have had no more than 510 at most, 507 if pedantic. If that is the case, why were Dons fans sitting in the Jack Barrett stand? I thought there was segregation in the Football League? Should have been turfed out and put with their own fans

sherry 20-05-2016 22:44

Re: PLAY OFF LEG 2 Home v Wimbledon (0-1 First leg)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Outback Ozzy (Post 1169241)
If Wimbledon wanted 1700, why is it that FL rules state they could have up to 2,000 or 10% of capacity, which means they should have had no more than 510 at most, 507 if pedantic. If that is the case, why were Dons fans sitting in the Jack Barrett stand? I thought there was segregation in the Football League? Should have been turfed out and put with their own fans

They must have been before and knew what it was like sitting in the cow shed!
:o

DAV007 20-05-2016 22:51

Re: PLAY OFF LEG 2 Home v Wimbledon (0-1 First leg)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Outback Ozzy (Post 1169241)
If Wimbledon wanted 1700, why is it that FL rules state they could have up to 2,000 or 10% of capacity, which means they should have had no more than 510 at most, 507 if pedantic. If that is the case, why were Dons fans sitting in the Jack Barrett stand? I thought there was segregation in the Football League? Should have been turfed out and put with their own fans

dont think it really matters, it was more income for the club and didnt effect the result.

i feel privileged to have witnessed such a great season, so close but we can do it all again next season.


All times are GMT. The time now is 20:10.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com