Accrington Web - Shoot the Magpies !.

Page 6 of 6

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

Accrington Web (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/index.php)

- Accrington Stanley (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f93/)

- - Shoot the Magpies !. (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f93/shoot-the-magpies-69349.html)

Lord Stiffupperlip

26-08-2017 09:30

Re: Shoot the Magpies !.

Quote:

Originally Posted by MikeA (Post 1200387)

Highlights: Notts County 2-2 Accrington | Video | Watch TV Show | Sky Sports

How was Kayden not given a penalty?

Another stonewall penalty denied, which could have won us the game.
But how & why were they given theirs?
Must be the softest penalty award ever!

Chimer

26-08-2017 09:45

Re: Shoot the Magpies !.

Quote:

Originally Posted by monkey hanger (Post 1200389)

sendings off and their penalty looked correct. need to bring a portugese actor into the club to coach our lads how to go down in the box to get our ist.penalty.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lord Stiffupperlip (Post 1200390)

Another stonewall penalty denied, which could have won us the game.
But how & why were they given theirs?
Must be the softest penalty award ever!

Who'd be a ref, eh? :D

cashman

26-08-2017 09:48

Re: Shoot the Magpies !.

To me looking at that the sending off was right, wasn't sure oer the notts penalty, jacko should certainly have had one.

monkey hanger

26-08-2017 09:50

Re: Shoot the Magpies !.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lord Stiffupperlip (Post 1200390)

Another stonewall penalty denied, which could have won us the game.
But how & why were they given theirs?
Must be the softest penalty award ever!

still a penalty as one of our lads charged into the back of one of theirs in the box. soft maybe but did kayden go down to easy with the push. penalty for me anyway as contact was there. just going off the highlights which was not the refs view.

monkey hanger

26-08-2017 10:01

Re: Shoot the Magpies !.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chimer (Post 1200392)

Who'd be a ref, eh? :D

that is the problem. being a referee its all about the angle you see an incident. have had lino,s flagging for stuff i thought was ok but they had a better angle to view the incident. at referee society meetings we discuss incidents with camara angles at nearer pitch level about why or why not some offence has been committed. not trying to stick up for carl boyeson but there are a lot worse than him around.

cashman

26-08-2017 10:28

Re: Shoot the Magpies !.

Quote:

Originally Posted by monkey hanger (Post 1200396)

I agree that just clearly demonstrates the Low standard the lower divisions get to me.

monkey hanger

27-08-2017 07:20

Re: Shoot the Magpies !.

Quote:

Originally Posted by cashman (Post 1200397)

I agree that just clearly demonstrates the Low standard the lower divisions get to me.

try a conference north game. know some leave a lot to be desired at our level but these coming up with all the referee acadamies for young refs are truly awful. may know the laws inside out, are very fit but have no feeling for a game whatsoever. even our mate kettle would look competant down there.

cashman

27-08-2017 07:30

Re: Shoot the Magpies !.

Quote:

Originally Posted by monkey hanger (Post 1200407)

I was referring to the 4 divisons, but that demonstrates it continues down.;)

ferret man

01-09-2017 10:06

Re: Shoot the Magpies !.

One game One set of rules, why do so many people see the same thing so differently.

yonmon

01-09-2017 12:44

Re: Shoot the Magpies !.

Quote:

Originally Posted by ferret man (Post 1200703)

One game One set of rules, why do so many people see the same thing so differently.

Is your question rhetorical or do you seek an answer ?.

ferret man

03-09-2017 12:53

Re: Shoot the Magpies !.

Quote:

Originally Posted by yonmon (Post 1200707)

Is your question rhetorical or do you seek an answer ?.

yes

Chimer

03-09-2017 14:36

Re: Shoot the Magpies !.

Quote:

Originally Posted by ferret man (Post 1200703)

One game One set of rules, why do so many people see the same thing so differently.

1. They're looking from different places.
2. They're looking through differently-tinted glasses.
3. They probably don't know the rules anyway.
4. Or the latest instructions for interpreting them.

But apart from that, I simply can't understand why there are ever any arguments. :confused:

All times are GMT. The time now is 20:06.

Page 6 of 6

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page