Re: Cheltenham match thread.
 

How can that be the reason we have brought in other keepers?:rolleyes: Do you suggest we only have 1?:rolleyes:

Re: Cheltenham match thread.
 

He has made some brilliant saves this season.

Of course you are. You are like those people who preface a statement by "Without being disrespectful...." and then utter words of total disrespect.

I would have thought that those two awesome saves near the end on Saturday proved you wrong. But I strongly suspect that nothing he does could ever prove you wrong.

Re: Cheltenham match thread.
 

No denying he's made some great saves and kept us in the game at times eg Notts County.

Overall not good enough- that's why we brought the guy in from Sunderland.

Again though, would love to be proved wrong.

Re: Cheltenham match thread.
 

Rubbish we brought the guy in from Sunderland cos we had only 1 keeper. plus a kid.

Re: Cheltenham match thread.
 

'Rubbish we brought the guy in from Sunderland cos we had only 1 keeper. plus a kid.'


We brought the guy from Sunderland in as our No1 with Chapman as back up. That's why he replaced Chapman against the Shrimps.

Re: Cheltenham match thread.
 

The loan was only till Jan?

Re: Cheltenham match thread.
 

From the website. Unless the impact referred to was Matt Macey I'd say he was brought in to be No1.

'Accrington Stanley have taken Polish goalkeeper Max Stryjek on loan until the end of the season.

Manager John Coleman said: “We have beaten off a couple of clubs to get him which is a coup for Accrington as we usually get the last pick.

“He is highly thought of, he has played for Polish Under 21s. Hopefully he will have the same impact as goalkeepers at Accrington have had in the past.” '

Re: Cheltenham match thread.
 

Fair enough thought was only till Jan.

Re: Cheltenham match thread.
 

Pleased to say Chapman was solid against Port Vale.