![]() |
the vs Fleetwood match thread
C'mon Stanley :alright:
|
Re: the vs Fleetwood match thread
Ugly game of football ⚽
|
Re: the vs Fleetwood match thread
Ugly till we hit the front.
|
Re: the vs Fleetwood match thread
%$#^%$@$%##*i&^&*^%$#&%$@^!!! :(
|
Re: the vs Fleetwood match thread
FFS, get one STANLEY
|
Re: the vs Fleetwood match thread
All over them on BBC stats machine.
|
Re: the vs Fleetwood match thread
..another grumpy Sunday.... :(
|
Re: the vs Fleetwood match thread
Disappointed is my over riding feeling, even game first half. The change to 4 3 3 interesting although Fleetwood looked weak on wings which maybe we could have exposed, they score and we pen them and deserved a equaliser but lacked the quality to get it. We struggled to create against a defensively strong side. It was horrible to watch but the fisherman time wasted the game out well. Some ugly scenes of fighting outside ground at the end. Not good for encouraging kids to come the game again. I have funny feeling we will put in a good performance against Sunderland. Will have to see.
Sent from my Moto G (5) using Tapatalk |
Re: the vs Fleetwood match thread
2 wins in our last 15 league games. Change of formation may we’ll be interesting but just shows we are currently clueless.
After Sunderland we have a run of 3 games against teams that if we lose to any of them, they overtake us. We then run into a sequence of teams either fighting automatic promotion, or the title (Luton whom I’m sure won’t enjoy giving it to us !) and finally play off position. We seem to have run out of ideas, steam and anything else. |
Re: the vs Fleetwood match thread
To say it was a poor scrappy game is a understatement. We deserved a draw at least. Our goal should have stood. Sadly we are lacking finishing quality. Things picked up when we made a couple of substitutions. We are out of sorts and I don't know why. Some players are just not playing to the standard we know they can. On the positive side I thought Harvey Rodgers put a good shift in and looked like he is almost back to his old self. Sykes had a great game and it was good to see him back in the team. We go again Wednesday and we need a win.
|
Re: the vs Fleetwood match thread
My over-riding feeling today was why, oh why do our midfield and defence keep on giving the ball away by passing, sorry ,..kicking the ball !, without even looking before they complete the action.
This must surely be a recipe for failure if ever one existed !. Having said that the Reds could possibly have got something out of the game seeing that Fleetwood's finishing was so poor !.. And so to bed !.. |
Re: the vs Fleetwood match thread
I thought Fleetwood were far the better team until they scored their goal then we woke up and had some good chances to score, the don given motm was a joke, Sykes was my motm, good news is hard to come bye last week clark got his 10th yellow incurring him a two match ban, followed by McConville receiving his 10th yellow today incurring a two match ban
|
Re: the vs Fleetwood match thread
Quote:
Came away feeling flat & almost like I hadn't been to a football game - please God let it be better on Wednesday. Hope Paul Smyth is ok after his battering today |
Re: the vs Fleetwood match thread
How can the Dom get MOTM when he can't even cross with his left foot shocking.sykes MOTM all day and I bet his mum egrees with me.she'll be putting it on Twitter as we speak
|
Re: the vs Fleetwood match thread
Something smells fishy - have Stanley had their chips?
We can bemoan missed chances, unfair decisions by officials & well rehearsed gamesmanship by our opponents till the boat comes in. The fact is that, based on today's performance, we're sinking faster than the Titanic. This was the day we were going to win & sail up the league. Instead, Fleetwood came with a game plan & we were done up like a kipper. Devoid of any creativity from a static midfield, we seemed unable to make any impact until, too late in the day, we finally made some substitutions. Barlaser improved the midfield & little Sousa injected some pep down the wing. If only this had been done at half-time, the result may have been different. Alas, it proved too little too late. Against a well drilled League 1 outfit, our deficiencies stood out like sore thumb. Too many of our squad are just not up to the job at this higher level. For once, our defence were not the main culprits. IMO both Sykes & Rodgers played well, although Donacien had a nightmare game. We just can't buy a goal at the moment, due largely to our players inability to find any space beyond the half-way line, unlike opponents, who always seem to find acres. Oh how we missed Jordan Clark. Unless we start scoring goals, I fear that Davy Jones' Locker awaits. PS. If you can think of any more fishy puns, let minnow! |
Re: the vs Fleetwood match thread
Quote:
The Wham Stadium today was certainly no 'Plaice' for cultured football today from either the 'Fisherman of Fleetwood' or the 'Flounders from Accrington'. I listened to Jo(k)ey Barton's interview on Radio Lancs on my way home and he showed just how much a 'Fish out of Water' he really is by his self contradictions! More like 'A man overboard' in all honesty!:frown: The Stanley 'Crew' selected today was so unbalanced as if 'The Nets had been Cast only over one side of Eric Cantona's Trawler'. It was only after Dimitar 'Fished'' the ball out of our 'Net' after the 'Fishermen' scored that we seemed to 'Cast our Lines Forward' but only somewhat briefly as the 'Tide' definitely seemed to be against us what with the 'Fishermens' 'Dogfishy' tactics and the Referee being 'All at Sea'. Yet another Ref who 'Sealed' a poor performance by only adding on 4 minutes of added time when he could have thrown Stanley a 'Lifeline' by adding on a bit more!:s_pirate: Most of the Stanley players played like they were 'Seasick', leaning over the 'Ships Side' intent on hitting the 'The Sea' with their vomit (Gromit).......(Couldn't help myself there!):dancedog: 'Coley' needs to get our boys to 'Sail' through these 'Current Stormy Waters' without letting us 'Sink' too far. Some of our boys seemed to play with a lack of 'Sole' today. Although it seems to be a 'Titanic' task ahead, I am confident that when 'Coley' and 'The 'Bell' 'Trawl' through the match video with the 'Captain' Seamus and the players that they will soon have the 'Stanley Crew' 'Surfing back up the League'!:help: Actually, in truth tonight I feel a bit 'Washed Up' like a 'Beached Whale' tonight. :s_splash: |
Re: the vs Fleetwood match thread
There was no porpoise to our play.
As for Barton , he can go suck on a fisherman’s friend. That said, I do wish our Chairman would stop commenting on other clubs as if he is Socrates ( the one who played for Greece Utd) |
Re: the vs Fleetwood match thread
Worst performance in years?
Only young Finley was half decent today. Deserved to lose. |
Re: the vs Fleetwood match thread
[QUOTE=Simpson;1226284]There was no porpoise to our play.
As for Barton , he can go suck on a fisherman’s friend. There's a pun in there Simpson... but I'll decline to use it !.. Instead I'll just ask for one thing as far as our team goes.. Not a new player to come along and work miracles, but a real Captain to lead the players on the field.. The two on show today, when it was sorely needed did not show one ounce of drive and purpose between them, which makes me think that they are either in need of a course on Man-management skills, or even worse that they are just not up to it !. I fear the latter is nearest the truth !. Quo Vadis Stanley ?. |
Re: the vs Fleetwood match thread
I presume Kee's goal disallowed for a push but can't find a video of the incident
|
Re: the vs Fleetwood match thread
Think I'm right in saying the limit went up to 15 yellow cards after 37 games so no suspension for McConville.
|
Re: the vs Fleetwood match thread
When I saw the line up on the team sheet, not only was I confused as to the formation, positions etc. I was more than a little worried :(
I put that to the side, as I have faith in the Team and Management...... :( There are quite a few things that I am not sure about at the moment with Stanley, but the one thing I am sure of, is that at the end of the season - when we are safe and I know we will be - John, Jimmy and Co. will have learnt more than they realise at this moment in time!! :) This time in 12 months, we will not be in the same position ;) :) :) :) |
Re: the vs Fleetwood match thread
There has to be a shaking up of the squad if we’re still in league one. That’s going to take investment like it or not.
Alternatively cash our chips in on a few while we can get fees and reinvest. Managers and coaches can’t keep performing miracles finding golden nuggets. I just hope we don’t resort to the loan market again. Imagine the position we would be in now if Ripley Anderton and ihiekwe had been permanent. |
Re: the vs Fleetwood match thread
Quote:
Then again, if Billy's goal had stood & after watching the highlights last night I can't see much difference in the circumstances of both goals, it could have been a very different game |
Re: the vs Fleetwood match thread
Quote:
|
Re: the vs Fleetwood match thread
Had to miss the last 10 minutes as had a train to catch worst game by both sides as a spectacle but if Billy,s goal hadn't been ruled out and the stonewall penalty given we would have taken the 3 points against a very dirty team despite what Barton the vocal pillock he is thinks about his great side that deserved to win by 4 or 5.
|
Re: the vs Fleetwood match thread
Was sick as a parrot having to miss the game, but after hearing my mates comments after the match, am damn glad i did.:(
|
Re: the vs Fleetwood match thread
Quote:
|
Re: the vs Fleetwood match thread
The bar was a farce at half time too - staff waiting for a barrel to be changed for 15 mins rather than serving or offering other beers.
Bad day all round. |
Re: the vs Fleetwood match thread
Next 4 games are now crucial Sunderland home,Wimbledon away,then Rochdale and Walsall both home we have to be looking for at least 4 to 6 points from these games to stand a realistic chance of staying in this division time for players staff and fans to all get behind everything to carry us to a bit of luck and over the line.
|
Re: the vs Fleetwood match thread
[QUOTE=choirboy;1226298]Billy definitely pushed the defender. I could even see if cleary from the Clayton End.
as if billy never gets pushed by a defender and nothings given even the 3rd and 4th time it happens. |
Re: the vs Fleetwood match thread
[QUOTE=Simpson;1226284]
As for Barton , he can go suck on a fisherman’s friend. waist of a good throat lozenge. some people in the game you can listen to for hours but that dick barton special manager it was seconds of my life i wasted listening . not sour grapes either as i,ve no gripes with his club. |
Re: the vs Fleetwood match thread
[QUOTE=monkey hanger;1226307]
Quote:
|
Re: the vs Fleetwood match thread
Unfortunately, the defeat yesterday followed a pattern which is becoming depressingly common.
'We didn't deserve to lose'. 'We could have won'. 'We should have won' It's natural to blame the team but how much is due to our predictable game plan, which never changes win, draw or lose. Our League 1 opponents know exactly how we play. They analyse our strengths & our weaknesses. They've learnt that if they press our back line, we'll make mistakes or revert to the long ball. If they mark Kee & Smyth closer than a duck's a***, they'll nullify our attack. Fleetwood just added a bit of gbh to the mix yesterday to make doubly sure. It was clear by half-time we were struggling to combat Barton's game-plan, but no changes were made until the 73rd minute. Yes, a few of our players are struggling to step up to League 1 level. Perhaps the same can be said of the management? |
Re: the vs Fleetwood match thread
A really disappointing performance. Sad to say but Fleetwood were far more organised. As soon as an attack broke down, they immediately returned to an organised shape - and we looked clueless. We ended up hoofing the ball towards Billy Kee who was unlikely to win very much against a giant centre back.
It also seems very odd to have two right-footed players as left back and left wing. All defenders will know that the pair of them will switch the ball to their right foot to centre it. So predictable and easy to defend. :hidewall: |
Re: the vs Fleetwood match thread
Quote:
As a Johnny-come-lately bandwagon jumper, I wasn't on AccyWeb when we got promoted to the Conference, but I bet someone said it then too :( You might even be right, if you say it when we get to the Championship as you were hoping we might, back in October. But for now I'll keep on keeping on keeping the faith ;) |
Re: the vs Fleetwood match thread
If its true :eek: Back stabber or what after all Stanley's dune for you :mad:
Quote:
|
Re: the vs Fleetwood match thread
Quote:
|
Re: the vs Fleetwood match thread
Definitely echo what Revived Red has stated.
Fleetwood were well organised, and seemed to comfortabley eliminate any threat we could of posed. Billy was took out of the game by a strong and tall centre half. Janoi wears two right boots so there was no surprise there wasn't a single cross in from him on the left. Unfortunate really as I really like/rate him but he just hasn't come back the same player that left. I also noticed some comments he has made about Paul Lambert texting him and keeping in touch saying he wants him back at Ipswich over the summer etc, that must be playing on his mind rather than thinking he must impress for potential suitors if he was on his way out... Sean missed a golden opportunity and you really would expect him to do better. No composure throughout the team (glad to see Seamus back however, did his job reasonably well) Erico looked lively when he came on and I must admit I was pleasantly surprised at his contribution, he beat his man a couple of times and delivered some good crosses into the box. Also his corner he took at the end actually beat the first man hurrrahhhh!!!! Dimi made 1 or 2 good saves, I have to feel the one he saved with his legs in the first half - if that was Jonny in goal we'd be 1-0 down at that point. His kicking is absolutely shocking though -.- Was surprised when I saw the line up - initially thought it was 4-3-3 but it seemed to be more of a 4-1-3-2. Wouldn't of played Smyth out wide as he was constantly marked all game. Wouldn't of started Armstrong. Said it before, too much like Connor Hall. He played as a striker for what, 70 minutes of the match? Can't recall him once facing the Fleetwood goal with the ball at his feet, or even having a shot. Think Erico for Armstrong was the right call as it gave us a bit more creativity and pace out wide whilst allowing Smyth to push more central. Would of liked Dan to of come on maybe after the hour mark. Surprised with the Callum for Harvey sub. Callum was obviously fresher and is slightly more attacking. But given Harvey can play CB, I'd of taken off Janoi who was absolutely blowing at the end and put on Scotty to allow Barlaser and Sam to play more attacking. Or even lumped Ross Sykes up front and brought on Big Ben as well. Onto Wednesday now, we can't change the past but we can change the future. Not 100% confident - depends on team selection and formation.... Keep The Faith. 2-2 at their place and 1-1 after 70 mins at ours. Come On Stanley!! |
Re: the vs Fleetwood match thread
Oh, and can't really moan at Fleetwoods time-wasting tactics at the end.
I would hope we would of done similar if we were in that position! |
Re: the vs Fleetwood match thread
Quote:
Anyone quoting our budget in future separate debates just think about this wasted salary, the unused loanees and their housing costs. We could do much better with our money before we start highlighting Fleetwood budget etc etc. |
Re: the vs Fleetwood match thread
I mean when we signed Andy Mangan we didn’t exactly have an abundance of attacking options, especially after losing Kayden.
As for your jibe about wasted budget, shall we just have 11 players? Every team has a squad and I’m sure if you go through Fleetwoods they will have players who haven’t featured much. Thats just the way football is nowadays. Most in our squad have had a chance in the last 6 months at some point. |
Re: the vs Fleetwood match thread
Think the signing of Mangy wasn't just about his playing time on the pitch.
Worked well for him being someone he knew and enjoyed,around close friends, whilst being given the opportunity to progress with his coaching badges. Worked well for Accy to have his energy and enthusiasm around the club. Alot of the players have spoken highly about him this season. Unused loanees are unused for a reason. Housing costs would be there regardless.... |
Re: the vs Fleetwood match thread
Dont get what any fuss is about?:confused: if a player signs for any team his job is to be responsible fer that side, not any side he was with before. so slagging him for that is rather pathetic in my view.
|
Re: the vs Fleetwood match thread
Quote:
Andy owes us nothing. If he had a pop at Shrewsbury in the sane manner that wouldn’t give a @@@@. It really becomes tedious when people think ex players owe previous clubs a dime .... they don’t. |
Re: the vs Fleetwood match thread
Quote:
I know he served his ban & I have no problem with him plying his trade elsewhere, but his return left a sour taste with me hence I'm happy he's gone |
Re: the vs Fleetwood match thread
Quote:
He left a boy and came back a man. I would hate it if mistakes I made in my youth stopped my career progression 10 years later. On a personal level, he was an absolute gentleman taking time to speak to my partner since she moved up here with me and whilst she was working at Stanley. Guess that is the side to him not many people see. |
Re: the vs Fleetwood match thread
Quote:
But we're stranded down Poundland with 99p |
Re: the vs Fleetwood match thread
Quote:
As I said, I have no problem with him progressing his career elsewhere |
Re: the vs Fleetwood match thread
Quote:
|
Re: the vs Fleetwood match thread
I'll close this down folks as we're wandering again.
I'd also rather guesses at individual's income be kept private Thank you |
All times are GMT. The time now is 08:21. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com