At Bantams
 

No Whalley?
And no Coyle either.

Re: At Bantams
 

Saving them for Saturday i think

Re: At Bantams
 

..Brave man Greger...

Re: At Bantams
 

Re: At Bantams
 

I was not at fault, but Crellin might have been. Good strike, but straight at him.

Re: At Bantams
 

Rawson injured. Off.

Re: At Bantams
 

We are fighting as always, but are uncomfortable going forward. Ben Woods had a good strike early, otherwise pretty grey. Bradford are better of course, but have also created very little.

Re: At Bantams
 

I can understand half of that..... if true?


:)

Re: At Bantams
 

Batty - just about - limped off........ :(


:)

Re: At Bantams
 

Think we have pickup up. Henderson and Grant doing well since they came on. Henderson even hit the bar.

Re: At Bantams
 

Dam. Going to golf course to take out frustration on a little white ball. :(

Re: At Bantams
 

We were the better side second half and deserved a draw at the very least.

Re: At Bantams
 

At the very least? On one shot?

Re: At Bantams
 

what Bull**** Greger ...Stanley 6 shots Bradford 5 both teams 1 on target Stanley 52% - 49%.Why not try getting behind the team?

Re: At Bantams
 

I've been behind this team for 50 years!

But that does NOT mean I have to like defeats. We improved in the second half but to say that we deserved to WIN is absolute nonsense.

Nil (0) shots on goal in the second half is what the stats say, I say one (1) because Henderson's shot was close.

I liked what I saw of Grant and Henderson in the second half, and we were a lot more positive in the second half than we have been for some time. O'Brien did OK, too. An improvement, yes. But great we were not.