Porn to be banned by ISP's?

[gpick24]

Boobs wouldn`t be classed as porn surely, there main purpose is for the feeding of babies, but a few years later, when you`re a teenager, it`s unsuitable for you to look at them?

[cashman]

Originally Posted by gpick24

Boobs, there main purpose is for the feeding of babies,

Not in my book it aint.

[gpick24]

Originally Posted by cashman

Not in my book it aint.

Which books that, one from book parade on edgar street.

[accyman]

where as kids used to hide porn mags between porno and exchange magazines like soviet spies in seculded spots away from adults whole movoes can be exchanged via usb or bluetooth these days
.
god i envy these lucky sods they have it so easy and risk of capture is minimal lol

you leave a mucky mag out on your bed and your screwed

leave a usb flash drive and its either assumed to be for school or parent is unable to figure it out lol

[Neil]

Originally Posted by Margaret Pilkington

Like you, I think the more barriers that are in place, the harder it is for children to get to this stuff, then the better it is........it will put off those who are just looking out of mild curiousity and those who are persistent may get rumbled by their parents.
A slipper did the trick in my day

The more you tell kids not to do something the more they want to do it.

[gpick24]

Originally Posted by Neil

The more you tell kids not to do something the more they want to do it.

That`s very true, but it doesn`t mean it should be made easy for them. Sadly, the determined will find a way.

[jaysay]

Originally Posted by Margaret Pilkington

I don't get it John.....how am I in the same boat?
If children go to visit friends I expect their parents to be vigilant about what is accessible on the internet, if they cannot(or will not do this - for whatever reason) then surely it has to be better to have a system where people who want to access this type of material need a secure way to log in to access it.

I do not want children to be able to stumble upon violent rape scenes, or scenes which degrade women......is that wrong?

If adults wish to get their pleasure in this way, then that is their choice, but it should not be freely available just by punching some phrase into a search engine.

You can keep tabs on what kids do in their own homes but when they cross the threshold, unless you go with them, you ain't a clue what they're doing, but you've got to remember that kids are so computer literate these days, if they want to access anything it will be hard to stop them

[Sunflower49]

Originally Posted by jaysay

You can keep tabs on what kids do in their own homes but when they cross the threshold, unless you go with them, you ain't a clue what they're doing, but you've got to remember that kids are so computer literate these days, if they want to access anything it will be hard to stop them

That is true.

Plus, I am against violence, illegal activities, suppression and all the other things that feature in porn BUT, they also feature in other genres.

I would rather that had I an adolescent (note, not a CHILD) in my care, s/he explored their sexuality under my roof than had to go elsewhere to do it. I don't think porn is harmful in its essence, more so harmful when combined with other factors that contribute toward it being harmful.

[Sunflower49]

Originally Posted by Margaret Pilkington

I do not know what ageplay porn is....and I am unsure of what urolagnia is.....I won't google them just in case it takes me somewhere I don't want to be.......I might have been a nurse, but I am still a bit of a prude(I have told you before that in my head I am only 14)...as to the question would I ban media violence...yes I would make it something that was accessible only to those who had a pin number - but that is because I do not like violence of any kind...even the cartoon stuff makes me cringe.

I know violence exists in the world, but I do not consider it to be entertainment, and I do not want it in my living room.
When films come on TV and it says violence and bad language I head upstairs to read a book.

Now I guess I have made it plain why I watch so very little on TV.

I don't like violence either Margaret-I put it down to my being a bit of a wimp-but it scares me and makes me agitated.

A lot of films show representations of violence, people getting hurt, torture, aggression even non-physical, I do not like-it makes me feel uncomfortable and definitely isn't entertainment for me.

The other half loves this sort of stuff, I've tried to figure out why and tried to understand for the sake of common interest.He's far 'harder' than me as a person (for which I am thankful!) but I can't like this sort of stuff. I know It's very popular, I know it's not real, and I am probably the 'weirdo' for not liking violent films.

Bad language doesn't bother me unless It's used aggressively like in aforementioned films. In comedies etc I'm not bothered by it.

Ageplay refers to where an actress/actor of legal age pretends to be younger for the sake of adult entertainment-dresses in a younger style, talks squeaky, pigtails etc.

I think it can also mean when a younger actress pretends to be older but this is less popular, or an older woman pretends to be in her twenties, etc.

From what I know the most popular type is a young-ish woman pretending to be an age anywhere from infant to schoolgirl. It is supposedly banned on many websites, but as I said, were you to search for it-couple of clicks and you've got it.

I am not sure where I stand on ageplay morally. On the one hand, it can be seen as wrong to want to fantasise about the under-age, on the other hand-it's a harmless outlet for those who MAY have sinister tendencies, It's acting at the end of the day-and if it is between two consenting adults then?
But that's another discussion altogether.

[Margaret Pilkington]

Originally Posted by Neil

The more you tell kids not to do something the more they want to do it.

And if you tell them to do it they don't? Right, well unless it includes cleaning their room.

[Less]

Originally Posted by Margaret Pilkington

And if you tell them to do it they don't? Right, well unless it includes cleaning their room.

It is just a sound bite, an unmade promise, there must be some bad news he's busy trying to hide.

The Police have already admitted for every really nasty porn site they close down about three more open up.

[Margaret Pilkington]

Less, I was talking about children...Neil observed that if you tell them not to do something they will go all out to do it.

[Margaret Pilkington]

Originally Posted by Less

The Police have already admitted for every really nasty porn site they close down about three more open up.

Maybe they aren't trying hard enough then.
It is getting so that the police admit defeat before they even try...I suppose it is much the same with drugs.....maybe that is why there are some factions that want them legalised.

[Less]

Originally Posted by Margaret Pilkington

Less, I was talking about children...Neil observed that if you tell them not to do something they will go all out to do it.

I also in post #1 mentioned anything to do with children is a no, no, by which I meant, whether viewing them or allowing them to view, it still comes down to parents taking responsibility.

[Margaret Pilkington]

Originally Posted by Less

I also in post #1 mentioned anything to do with children is a no, no, by which I meant, whether viewing them or allowing them to view, it still comes down to parents taking responsibility.

And I think you will find that I agreed with that, but also noted that some parents you wouldn't entrust with the care of a gerbil, let alone children.