14-06-2012, 17:14
|
#10
|
I am Banned
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Accrington.
Posts: 4,627
Liked: 601 times
Rep Power: 0
|
Re: Private Arthur Cheetham
Quote:
Originally Posted by Balbus
In the Observer article, Bill Turner refers to the Pals being at Ayette. I quoted from his article. He doesn't seem to have drawn the same distinction as you.
You've answered my query - Arthur Cheetham, like 2/Lt Horsfall, was not an original Accrington Pal.
|
Bill Turner could not have written a book about the Accrington Pals, for it to cease on July 5th 1916, of course he made the same distinction as I have, we worked together on the men of the 11th East Lancs since his book was first published.
But he was writing a book, so he had to keep refering to them as the Accrington Pals although by Nov 11th 1918 there were less that 50 of the original Pals still serving in the 11th East Lancs.
When the jerries started their big push in March 1918, by the end of April the 11th Battation, had near as many casualties as they did on July 1st 1916.
On mens attestation papers, those who were original Pals, had Accrington Battalion written on them, those who joined later just had East Lancs.
Retlaw.
|
|
|