Allegations about Jimmy Saville: covered up? - Page 28

kestrelx · 25-10-2012, 06:49

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris SUI JURIS

now then now then how's about that then,here are some more of jimbo's friends

That is a weird photo, I bet Savile revelled in the power he had having keys to Broadmore - what where they thinking giving someone like him keys?

Saw the Panorama documentary the other night - the scene of the "Clunk Click" program with him and Gary Glitter with there arms around those 16 (15) year old girls and Savile said to Glitter, "Get in there get between 'em!" Sordid...

Gary Glitter was even in the Spicegirls Movie but his scene was deleted...

kestrelx · 25-10-2012, 09:31

Quote:

Originally Posted by MargaretR

Peter Rippon was the man who had a rapid 'change of mind' which resulted in the Newsnight Saville programme not being shown last year.

Entwistle has just told the Commons Committee that he (Entwistle) did not instruct the programme to be abandoned.

Does this not make you wonder who did?
....and who has more control over him than his boss.

It looks suspiciously like he 'had an offer he couldn't refuse'

MP Tom Watson calls for Police to investigate an alleged paedophile ring in Parliament...linked to a previous Prime Ministers "senior adviser"... who could that be, any guesses?

BBC News - MP raises claim of past paedophile ring linked to No 10

Boeing Guy · 26-10-2012, 07:36

Interesting that the victims of Jimmy Saville are going to sue for millions
Jimmy Savile: BBC faces allegations over 'censored' emails, 12 victims abused by DJ head for court | Mail Online

Yet the Hilsbrough families have to release a charity record to raise money
BBC News - Musicians record track for Hillsborough families

Justice.....

Restless · 26-10-2012, 09:58

I bet spice girls are disgusted with themselves for singing that song. How he was allowed to be potrayed as a musician in the first place(back then) is disgusting enough to me. that song is an insult to any musician.

gynn · 27-10-2012, 19:33

So a number of 1960s 'celebrities' are so worried they will become embroiled in the Jimmy Savile scandal, they have employed the services of the publicist Max Clifford.

What in goodness name is a PUBLICIST going to achieve for them?

If they DIDN'T abuse children, they have nothing to worry about.

If they DID abuse them, they deserve all they get. They'd be better off getting a good lawyer rather than a grubby publicist.

And the excuse about being caught up in the 'hedonistic atmosphere of the times' doesn't remotely hold water. Child abuse was as much a crime then as it is now.

gynn · 27-10-2012, 19:43

.....and furthermore, if any of them HAS admitted to this Clifford character that they DID abuse children, he had better report it straight to the police or he will be laying himself open to charges of perverting the course of justice.

As far as i know, 'publicists' have no legal standing in withholding information from the police for reasons of client confidentiality.

kestrelx · 28-10-2012, 12:05

Quote:

Originally Posted by Restless

I bet spice girls are disgusted with themselves for singing that song. How he was allowed to be potrayed as a musician in the first place(back then) is disgusting enough to me. that song is an insult to any musician.

I bet they are...Glitter has been arrested today. What is wrong with the song

Surely it's no worse than any other Glam rock by bands like Slade, Sweet and so on.

cashman · 28-10-2012, 12:14

Whilst it aint much of a shock Pervert Glitter has been arrested, it makes me wonder if this is n easy option fer em? Rather n arrest someone higher up the peado chain?

DaveinGermany · 28-10-2012, 12:30

Quote:

Originally Posted by cashman

Whilst it aint much of a shock Pervert Glitter has been arrested, it makes me wonder if this is n easy option fer em? Rather n arrest someone higher up the peado chain?

Hopefully they can screw the disgusting scrote & get him to start squealing names & numbers so plod can round the creatures up, no matter their position or profile.

MargaretR · 28-10-2012, 12:46

The main obstacle to exposure of pedophile networks is participation by police, politicians, and judges in the very practices that we are asking them to expose.

At the moment the disposable small fry are being hung out to dry.
Deeper levels of the corruption will only get exposed if the 'free press' have the gumption to expose it.

We can but hope that in the scramble to avoid exposure, the participants will reveal each other.
It will be Murdoch's revenge.

Margaret Pilkington · 28-10-2012, 12:48

I think it is coming Margaret. The day when the squealers come out of the woodwork.

cashman · 28-10-2012, 12:56

Quote:

Originally Posted by Margaret Pilkington

I think it is coming Margaret. The day when the squealers come out of the woodwork.

My fear wi that is who will they actually squeal too?

Its already been demonstrated i think with J.S. how people ignored fer sake of ambition etc.

Margaret Pilkington · 28-10-2012, 13:03

Because of the current furore about what went on all those years ago, it is now easier to bring up these episodes...and they know that more note will be taken of what is being said....it maybe that the squealers go to the press first.......many of the squealers have fulfilled their ambitions, and are only looking to cover their backs by exposing someone else.

My main concern is that those who are in high places in the judiciary/politics/police(and there will be some) may have had enough warning to destroy the evidence.