Forwarded this to someone I know ..
Hope it helps :-
"Highway Authorities are empowered under the Road Traffic Regulation Act
1984 to make Traffic Regulation Orders (TROs) to regulate the speed,
movement and parking of vehicles and to regulate pedestrian movement. A
residents' parking zone does indeed need road markings to indicate which
parking bays are for residents only. In order for a Traffic Regulation
Order to be legal there needs to be three conditions met:
1. The road markings need to match those stated in the Traffic Signs
Roads and General Directions and be clearly visible and identifiable
2. The TRO plate (usually located on the footway fixed to a pole or
lamppost) needs to state clearly what the order is, when it applies and
needs to be positioned within 15m of the start of the TRO and at least
30m intervals (usually every lampost)
3. The legal order held in the Council offices needs to be in force and
match that on the street (which in many cases it does not)
She will need to write to Bury Council (within 14 days) and detail why
she disagrees with the ticket. She will need to clearly state the
reasons why she disagrees with the penalty. Tell her to stick to the
facts, outline a good case and don't whinge about the traffic
wardens/council/fairness of the ticket because ultimately the person who
decides whether the penalty is fair (or not) will be an independent
adjudicator with no vested interest either way - complaining just
weakens her case.
The only issue she might encounter is whether she has any supporting
evidence? The council will probably have photographic evidence of (what
they believe) to be the infringement, the relevant on-street TRO, the
road markings and the vehicle. If she was indeed parked in a location
with no road markings and the council has photos, it might strengthen
her case. Was there anyone else with her? Could she take photographs
of the location showing the lack of signs/road markings? In addition,
she is well within her rights to request further evidence from the
council (or indeed, all the evidence) that they believe proves she has
contravened the parking restriction.
Based on the information that your friend has provided, if she is
correct about where she parked and the ticket wasn't for some other
reason (other than contravening the resident parking zone restriction),
then I would say she should appeal. I would also suggest she would win.
Bear this in mind, 60% of all appealled tickets are successful but less
than 1% of all tickets are appealled! Traffic wardens aren't exactly
Grade A* students (or else they wouldn't be traffic wardens) and most
error is human. She will need to check that the ticket is definitely
for infringement of the Residents' Parking Order, it might be for
something else entirely, but if it is and there are no signs or road
markings where she parked, it sounds like the ticket has been issued
incorrectly.
The final thing is that even if the initial appeal is unsuccessful,
don't be afraid to challenge the appeal. At that stage, you are going
to be liable for the same amount so take it all the way. "