travelling - Page 2

Eric · 05-07-2007, 18:33

Quote:

Originally Posted by blazey

I think he meant ending in S. 1 Wale - 2 Wales lol.

Maybe it is just that the plural and singular have the same form. Like sheep (no sheeps), deer (no deers), moose (how about mooses, or meese).

beechy · 05-07-2007, 18:38

Quote:

Originally Posted by blazey

Lol well obviously but seen as he classed wales as being plural it was obvious what he was asking for.

sorry cant sleep for all this noise
netherlands has it i think

Lolly · 05-07-2007, 20:45

Quote:

Originally Posted by Eric

Maybe it is just that the plural and singular have the same form. Like sheep (no sheeps), deer (no deers), moose (how about mooses, or meese).

But there is only one Wales, therefore has no plural.

Eric · 05-07-2007, 20:53

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lolly

But there is only one Wales, therefore has no plural.

This is true. Unless one considers North Wales as being sort of separate from South Wales.

Eric · 05-07-2007, 20:54

How does New South Wales fit in to this fascinating topic?

Lolly · 05-07-2007, 21:17

Quote:

Originally Posted by Eric

How does New South Wales fit in to this fascinating topic?

Theres only one of those to. lol.

WillowTheWhisp · 05-07-2007, 21:36

OK, I'm going to warn you in advance this is a boring start to my reply so work yourself up to it before reading. (Or just skip right past it if you prefer.)

Wasn't the opening post a bit tongue in cheek? A bit of, well you know, humour?

That's how I read it anyway.

And now for my two pennorth of plural countries, how about Honduras, Philippines, Comoros and Laos?