Accrington Web
   

Home Gallery Arcade Blogs Members List Today's Posts
Go Back   Accrington Web > AccyWeb > General Chat
Donate! Join Today

General Chat General chat - common sense in here please. Decent serious discussions to be enjoyed by everyone!


Welcome to Accrington Web!

We are a discussion forum dedicated to the towns of Accrington, Oswaldtwistle and the surrounding areas, sometimes referred to as Hyndburn! We are a friendly bunch please feel free to browse or read on for more info.
You are currently viewing our site as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, photos, play in the community arcade and use our blog section. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free, so please, join our community today!



Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 24-04-2006, 22:44   #1
Give, give, give member
 
garinda's Avatar
 

A right carry on before the water shed.

I'm no prude but.......

yesterday afternoon I happened to turn on the television and there was the film Carry On Dick.

When it was released in 1974 you had to be over fourteen to watch it in the cinema. It certainly didn't have the saucy seaside humour of the Carry On films of the fifties and sixties.

It contained crude jokes about male genitalia, well it would when the highway man was called Big Dick, but some of the script seemed very adult orientated. There was also lots of couplings, and a brief glimpse of Barbara Windsor's famous assets.

Maybe I'm getting old, but it really did seem a bit inappropriate for Sunday teatime viewing.

What happened to Black Beauty, or dramatising classic children's books?
__________________
'If you're going to be a Kant, be the very best Kant there is my son.'
Johann Georg Kant, father of Immanuel Kant, philosopher.






garinda is offline   Reply With Quote
Accrington Web
Old 24-04-2006, 22:49   #2
Full Member
 
Nell's Avatar
 

i know what you mean, theres been a few carry on films on tv lately and my kids were watching the last one. I found myself turning channels as it was smut and whilst we are very openminded in our house, it was done in an uncomfortable manner. Do you know what i mean?
Nell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-04-2006, 22:54   #3
God Member
 
shillelagh's Avatar
 

Re: A right carry on before the water shed.

What's happened to dramatising kids books - they make them into films instead of tv programmes. Look at the Harry Potter books - theyve made them into films instead of a series.
shillelagh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-04-2006, 22:54   #4
Give, give, give member
 
garinda's Avatar
 

Re: A right carry on before the water shed.

I do know what you mean.

If I'd have been watching it with children I would have been embarrassed too.

C**k jokes, at five pm on Sunday afternoon, aren't funny.

Shame on you Granada/ITV.

Rindy Whitehouse.
__________________
'If you're going to be a Kant, be the very best Kant there is my son.'
Johann Georg Kant, father of Immanuel Kant, philosopher.






garinda is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-04-2006, 22:57   #5
Give, give, give member
 
garinda's Avatar
 

Re: A right carry on before the water shed.

There are still lots of classic childrens books that haven't been dramatised.


Although I hate repeats, I wouldn't mind in the least if they showed all the children's dramas from the 70's. After all children as an audience aren't going to have seen them before, because that age group is all the time renewing itself.
__________________
'If you're going to be a Kant, be the very best Kant there is my son.'
Johann Georg Kant, father of Immanuel Kant, philosopher.






garinda is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-04-2006, 23:09   #6
Resident Waffler

 
WillowTheWhisp's Avatar
 

Re: A right carry on before the water shed.

I haven't seen that film but it doesn't sound like I've missed much. There used to be some really lovely programs on TV.
__________________
http://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/signaturepics/sigpic1202_2.gif

WillowTheWhisp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-04-2006, 23:14   #7
Give, give, give member
 
garinda's Avatar
 

Re: A right carry on before the water shed.

http://www.carryonline.com/carry/codick.html


Besides all the unsubtle smutty language, Joan Sims was the love interest/sex object, need I say more?
__________________
'If you're going to be a Kant, be the very best Kant there is my son.'
Johann Georg Kant, father of Immanuel Kant, philosopher.






garinda is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-04-2006, 23:50   #8
Member.

 

Re: A right carry on before the water shed.

Quote:
Originally Posted by garinda
I'm no prude but.......

yesterday afternoon I happened to turn on the television and there was the film Carry On Dick.

When it was released in 1974 you had to be over fourteen to watch it in the cinema. It certainly didn't have the saucy seaside humour of the Carry On films of the fifties and sixties.

It contained crude jokes about male genitalia, well it would when the highway man was called Big Dick, but some of the script seemed very adult orientated. There was also lots of couplings, and a brief glimpse of Barbara Windsor's famous assets.

Maybe I'm getting old, but it really did seem a bit inappropriate for Sunday teatime viewing.

What happened to Black Beauty, or dramatising classic children's books?
I maybe missing something here so forgive me if I am.

What a complete and utter load of bullocks. Smutty jokes yeah maybe, but the carry on films have been shown many times and at all times of day.

This is typical British School Yard Humour that every school kid relishes in. It’s harmless Tongue in cheek stuff that even we as kids relished. I would rather have my lads subjected to this form of smutty toilet humour than the f’ing and blinding that’s common on our streets today.

None of the “Carry On” films have harmed no one in my opinion, they maybe crap but in many ways it’s a lost form of humour that has been replaced by a lot of harder more explicit humour that kids see in Playstation or Xbox games and films targeted at younger individuals today.

I actually agree that it would be nice to see a resurgence of the good solid Children’s Drama, but it would perhaps only be appreciated in our eyes, regrettably for better or worse youngsters today have move on and what we enjoyed on TV many kids would reject today.
__________________

On - Stanley – On
- Who’s Laughing Now -
Doug is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-04-2006, 00:10   #9
Give, give, give member
 
garinda's Avatar
 

Re: A right carry on before the water shed.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Doug
I maybe missing something here so forgive me if I am.

What a complete and utter load of bullocks. Smutty jokes yeah maybe, but the carry on films have been shown many times and at all times of day.

This is typical British School Yard Humour that every school kid relishes in. It’s harmless Tongue in cheek stuff that even we as kids relished. I would rather have my lads subjected to this form of smutty toilet humour than the f’ing and blinding that’s common on our streets today.

None of the “Carry On” films have harmed no one in my opinion, they maybe crap but in many ways it’s a lost form of humour that has been replaced by a lot of harder more explicit humour that kids see in Playstation or Xbox games and films targeted at younger individuals today.

I actually agree that it would be nice to see a resurgence of the good solid Children’s Drama, but it would perhaps only be appreciated in our eyes, regrettably for better or worse youngsters today have move on and what we enjoyed on TV many kids would reject today.
Have you seen it?

The early Carry On films had typical English innuendo, and were saucy in the same way seaside postcards are. This was a film released (1974) when the British film industry was in the pits. Seeing bare breasts, and having jokes featuring the word c*ck as the punchline, didn't seem appropriate for Sunday teamtime viewing.

When released the film was to be shown only to over fourteen year olds. I don't know how old your son is, but I certainly wouldn't have been happy to let my nephew see it, aged seven.

If something that was deemed only to be suitable for young adults (14+), is now to be shown at teatime thirty years later, what have families to look forward to next Sunday teatime? Emmanuelle?
__________________
'If you're going to be a Kant, be the very best Kant there is my son.'
Johann Georg Kant, father of Immanuel Kant, philosopher.







Last edited by garinda; 25-04-2006 at 00:13.
garinda is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-04-2006, 07:15   #10
God Member
 
SPUGGIE J's Avatar
 

Re: A right carry on before the water shed.

I think when it comes to the Carry On films then it should be down to the parent to decide what is or isnt for their kids. Personely I think there is a lot worse on telly which they see than some CO films. Though I enjoy the CO films I think this one should have been on later.
__________________

All comments above are nothing to do with here and therefore not the resposibility of the Accrington Web site owners admins or mods.


THEY ARE MINE!!!!




SPUGGIE J is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-04-2006, 09:42   #11
Give, give, give member
 
garinda's Avatar
 

Re: A right carry on before the water shed.

I wouldn't have a problem with it being shown in the daytime if it was a school day, when hopefully the under fours wouldn't really understand it anyway, and presumably the parent/carer would be monitering what was being watched.

Like I said earlier, this Carry On didn't have the daft, innocent charm of the films made in the 50's and 60's. This was made for release in the cinema, and would have been in direct competition with the adult T & A films that were being made in Britain at the time, such as the Confessions of films starring Robin Asquith.

Again like I've said I'm no prude, but I was genuinely shocked that this was shown at a teatime on a Sunday when children could be watching, whilst their parents thought it was safe to let them view.

I'm still unsure how a film passed by the censor to be seen by people 14+ in 1974, is now thought of as suitable for everyone, young children included, thirty years later.
__________________
'If you're going to be a Kant, be the very best Kant there is my son.'
Johann Georg Kant, father of Immanuel Kant, philosopher.






garinda is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2006, 16:59   #12
Give, give, give member
 
garinda's Avatar
 

Re: A right carry on before the water shed.

Thank you ITV for acting on my compaint.

The afternoon showing of the classic Walt Disney version from 1950 of Treasure Island, was much more suitable viewing.

Not even any innuendo about Long John Silver, unlike the bawdy 70's Carry On Dick.
__________________
'If you're going to be a Kant, be the very best Kant there is my son.'
Johann Georg Kant, father of Immanuel Kant, philosopher.






garinda is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2006, 17:07   #13
God Member
 
SPUGGIE J's Avatar
 

Re: A right carry on before the water shed.

Cant argue with that, but then after all that acction their clothes were still pretty clean. Talk about artistic licence.
__________________

All comments above are nothing to do with here and therefore not the resposibility of the Accrington Web site owners admins or mods.


THEY ARE MINE!!!!




SPUGGIE J is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2006, 18:33   #14
Grand Wizard Of The Inner Clique
 
Less's Avatar
Re: A right carry on before the water shed.

Quote:
Originally Posted by garinda
Thank you ITV for acting on my compaint.

The afternoon showing of the classic Walt Disney version from 1950 of Treasure Island, was much more suitable viewing.

Not even any innuendo about Long John Silver, unlike the bawdy 70's Carry On Dick.
There was one innuendo, rindy, when he asked the good guys to help him get up

Fortunately they were all gentlemen and refused his offer!
__________________
“I am a Bear of Very Little Brain, and long words bother me.”
Winnie the Pooh
Quotes & quoting
Less is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2006, 19:59   #15
Full Member
 

Re: A right carry on before the water shed.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Doug
I maybe missing something here so forgive me if I am.

What a complete and utter load of bullocks. Smutty jokes yeah maybe, but the carry on films have been shown many times and at all times of day.

This is typical British School Yard Humour that every school kid relishes in. It’s harmless Tongue in cheek stuff that even we as kids relished. I would rather have my lads subjected to this form of smutty toilet humour than the f’ing and blinding that’s common on our streets today.

None of the “Carry On” films have harmed no one in my opinion, they maybe crap but in many ways it’s a lost form of humour that has been replaced by a lot of harder more explicit humour that kids see in Playstation or Xbox games and films targeted at younger individuals today.

I actually agree that it would be nice to see a resurgence of the good solid Children’s Drama, but it would perhaps only be appreciated in our eyes, regrettably for better or worse youngsters today have move on and what we enjoyed on TV many kids would reject today.
I think I may agree with you there!

"I'm no prude" Ha.
morgan_brotherz is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Other sites of interest.. More town sites..




All times are GMT. The time now is 18:56.


© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1