Anyone made a secret Freedom Of Info request about me ? Andrew? - Page 37

Neil · 18-02-2009, 01:31

Quote:

Originally Posted by BERNADETTE

Now we have two members saying the thread should be closed.

It should not be closed, just have off topic posts cleaned up.

garinda · 18-02-2009, 01:31

Quote:

Originally Posted by turkishdelight

well stated Bernadette dont really know what all the problem is whatever the motive was does it really matter.

The same as my motive not really mattering, when I posted that Andrew had to resit a year.

If people chose to stick their head above the parapet in the public arena, they'll have to realise there are some damn fine archers out there.

garinda · 18-02-2009, 01:32

Quote:

Originally Posted by Neil

It should not be closed, just have off topic posts cleaned up.

So far only post 541 has totally gone off topic.

turkishdelight · 18-02-2009, 01:33

Its my understanding its all a bit childish this its like you throw a stone at me and i will throw one back have you looked at yourselves and to the person stateing only one simple person on hear well it beggers belief., is this how you conduct yourself in the public eye shame.

garinda · 18-02-2009, 01:35

Quote:

Originally Posted by Neil

Seeing as it is free to do a FOI then anyone in this thread that thinks the results should be posted could request the information themselves and post it.

It may be free to request, but the cost to the public purse for the time and money it takes for Civil Servants to carry out the task, could surely be better spent than in doing it twice.

turkishdelight · 18-02-2009, 01:35

Quote:

Originally Posted by cashman

not paranoia bernie call it curiosity cos people now want "Honest Andrew" to publish both parties expenses fer comparison.

im sure if you want him to he will have no problem with it.

cashman · 18-02-2009, 01:35

Quote:

Originally Posted by cashman

not paranoia bernie call it curiosity cos people now want "Honest Andrew" to publish both parties expenses fer comparison.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Neil

Seeing as it is free to do a FOI then anyone in this thread that thinks the results should be posted could request the information themselves and post it.

thats true,but as its only fer a essay n andrew already has it, whats wrong wi that?

BERNADETTE · 18-02-2009, 01:37

Quote:

Originally Posted by cashman

not paranoia bernie call it curiosity cos people now want "Honest Andrew" to publish both parties expenses fer comparison.

Fair enough I now leave this thread but still think if Graham was so squeaky clean why the need to raise it in the first place? Just my view but this could and should have been done in private and then if Graham could back his claims of Andrew having an ulterior motive for requesting the information well and good raise it in public

garinda · 18-02-2009, 01:40

Quote:

Originally Posted by turkishdelight

im sure if you want him to he will have no problem with it.

Good.

I think we'd like that.

What deadline shall we work to?

A nice new thread, publishing all the details on here, by first thing Saturday morning?

cashman · 18-02-2009, 01:40

Quote:

Originally Posted by BERNADETTE

Fair enough I now leave this thread but still think if Graham was so squeaky clean why the need to raise it in the first place? Just my view but this could and should have been done in private and then if Graham could back his claims of Andrew having an ulterior motive for requesting the information well and good raise it in public

if ya looked at it a bit deeper, fer me theres noway he would raise it in public if there was owt to hide, especially not on here.

garinda · 18-02-2009, 01:43

Quote:

Originally Posted by cashman

if ya looked at it a bit deeper, fer me theres noway he would raise it in public if there was owt to hide, especially not on here.

If it'd been me I'd have started a thread saying the information had been requested, and wasn't it funny, coming so soon after the Tory scandal about increased expenses.

I'd have let others draw their own conclusions as to why it was requested, and by whom.

Caz · 18-02-2009, 01:45

Quote:

If it'd been me I'd have started a thread saying the information had been requested, and wasn't it funny, coming so soon after the Tory scandal about increased expenses.

I'd have let others draw their own conclusions as to why it was requested, and by whom.

Exactly my point way back, or at least emailing all councillors to say what he was doing.

turkishdelight · 18-02-2009, 01:47

Quote:

Originally Posted by garinda

If it'd been me I'd have started a thread saying the information had been requested, and wasn't it funny, coming so soon after the Tory scandal about increased expenses.

I'd have let others draw their own conclusions as to why it was requested, and by whom.

Its interesting but does it all really matter especially if information about expensives from both sides are published although i dont think thats what Andrew intended to do so may be he wont i dont know.

cashman · 18-02-2009, 01:50

i think it does matter from the point of view of killing dead all suspicions

turkishdelight · 18-02-2009, 01:51

Quote:

Originally Posted by garinda

Good.

I think we'd like that.

What deadline shall we work to?

A nice new thread, publishing all the details on here, by first thing Saturday morning?

i THINK HES TO BUSY AT THE MOMENT BUT IN TIME IF YOU REQUEST IT HE PROBABLY WILL BUT I DONT NO FOR CERTAIN AS THIS INFO WAS JUST FOR RESEARCH IM SURE WILL LET YOU KNOW IF YOU REQUEST IT.