are we heading to world war 3 - Page 7

cmonstanley · 31-08-2013, 08:49

tory splits also Ministers face sack over Syria shambles - Telegraph we cant keep thinking we are a power in the world its the Brazilians Chinese u.s.a. Canada etc that are the power houses now and they have their own human rights issues . brazil the hunting down of homeless kids and disappearances china people disappearing and the rest the u.s of a .the millions of homeless that don't appear on their official figures plus the ones in Canada too . we have no money they say , so why use a couple of billion bombing compounds in civilian areas which would back fire if any civilians were killed.

jaysay · 31-08-2013, 13:53

Quote:

Originally Posted by cmonstanley

the tory leadership wanted ed grew a set of balls and common sense prevailed

ive always said the biggest mistake of the last government was Iraq. it wasn't the first time Britain went to war with Iraq the tories were in power then . I set up a democratic poll that was open to everybody I didn't claim it was going to be end of the world that's only in your head

The sad part about this crap is that Milipede decided to play politics with security, its been said before that if Labour had been in power back in 1939 Hitler would have been goose stepping down Whitehall without a shot being fire, its easy to see why

cmonstanley · 31-08-2013, 14:05

don't talk rubbish, we cant afford the bombs according to your lot

even some of your lot are sceptical .this has improved our security .why would you bomb a country thousands of miles away without the proof. as they say a conflict of interests as camerons aide was employed by the rebels. lets watch the americans bomb them and see the consequences .

jaysay · 31-08-2013, 14:07

Quote:

Originally Posted by Guinness

On the contrary, I'm proving beyond a shadow of a doubt that he is a weak leader BECAUSE he has to use the whip.

He cannot debate his party into following him, so he uses the threat of deselection and career destruction. In any other employment situation he'd be in front of a tribunal for harassment!

And believe me Guinness if you don't do as your told by the high command in the Labour Party, be that in Government, County Council or Local Councils your out on your ear. The late George Slynn was a dyed in the wool socialist who gave his life to the Labour Party. A onetime leader of Hyndburn council, he was against the closure of an old folks home in great harwood at county hall, his thanks was deselected for his county seat, he ended his political career by standing for the Lib/Dems for county council. What a shoddy way to treat a chap like that. I can't say I was Georges greatest fan but he was passionate about serving the people but treated shamefully for it, Labour politicians are just cannon fodder to do as they're told when they're told no questions asked

jaysay · 31-08-2013, 14:14

Quote:

Originally Posted by cmonstanley

don't talk rubbish, we cant afford the bombs according to your lot

even some of your lot are sceptical .this has improved our security .why would you bomb a country thousands of miles away without the proof. as they say a conflict of interests as camerons aide was employed by the rebels. lets watch the americans bomb them and see the consequences .

Just noticed in another 54 posts you'll have reach your 5000 piece of crap on Accy Web congratulations on your forth coming achievement

cmonstanley · 31-08-2013, 14:18

no , that's not correct we have agreed on a few things jaysay

jaysay · 31-08-2013, 14:36

Quote:

Originally Posted by cmonstanley

no , that's not correct we have agreed on a few things jaysay

left is left and right is right um

cmonstanley · 31-08-2013, 17:18

alternative view but who knows ? EXCLUSIVE: Syrians In Ghouta Claim Saudi-Supplied Rebels Behind Chemical Attack

jaysay · 01-09-2013, 08:20

Quote:

Originally Posted by cmonstanley

alternative view but who knows ? EXCLUSIVE: Syrians In Ghouta Claim Saudi-Supplied Rebels Behind Chemical Attack

Mint press news Try micky mouse weekly next

Margaret Pilkington · 01-09-2013, 08:51

Well, I clicked on the link.....waited, waited and waited...then gave up...figuring that if C'mon had posted the link, he probably hadn't read it properly and it would say something other than what he thought it said. You know he is only interested in controversial/contentious headlines anyway, and frequently the article means something other than what the headline portrays.

Boeing Guy · 01-09-2013, 10:26

I did the same thing Maragret, could not find anything, however the source seems to be Russian, well there's a surprise and even more it is just a suggestion, as I have said a few times, it is interesting that the Russians have a close relationship with the Assad regime.

Back to the unpalatable taste that is happening, people are being killed for no good reason, Men, Women and Children and yet the resident dog stabber gloats at how the British Government were defeated.
In order order there is this:
Dan Hodges Quits Labour Over Syria - Guy Fawkes' blog

Briefly it tells of the five demands Ed Milliband made to David Cameron over the vote for action on Syria and how David Cameron agreed to those on the understanding that he would get the support of the Labour Party, only to find out Milliband has used this as a change for political gain.....

The Conservative party may not be very nice, but how can anyone vote for Labour with this clown in charge, he has allowed the Syrian regime to carry on murdering innocent human beings for his own political gain, he has blood on his hands.
Thank goodness we did not have Ed Milliband around in the late 1930's or even the early 1980's........

cmonstanley · 01-09-2013, 10:33

but we are skint we cant afford it. we let or own people live off food banks now. why should we care about anybody else. its all about selling weapons dont kid yourself it was going to be done following some moral code. the link i put in has been took down by the internet police it was working fine yesterday.

Boeing Guy · 01-09-2013, 10:36

Quote:

Originally Posted by cmonstanley

but we are skint we cant afford it. we let or own people live off food banks now. why should we care about anybody else. its all about selling weapons dont kid yourself it was going to be done following some moral code. the link i put in has been took down by the internet police it was working fine yesterday.

So that's alright then, thanks I had no idea, I will go back to my Ivory palace, I see you are already in your socialist version of one

Margaret Pilkington · 01-09-2013, 10:37

It saddens me to think that a man who has children can give orders for civilian population of his own people to be hit with biological weapons...weapons for which there can be no excuse. (I do believe it was the Assad regime who used these weapons...and before anyone tells me that beliefs are not facts....I know, but the other arguments do not make sense to me)

Now even the President of the US is going to follow the lead of our PM and go to the representatives of the public.
Does this mean that they have seen the futility of wading into a region that is in conflict, and where they can make no good difference...only make matters
worse?

Why are the Arab nations sitting on their hands?
Isn't this conflict in their backyard?

And what a surprise! France has decided that it cannot take on this conflict on its own...but was ready to hang onto the coat tails of the bigger and more powerful US.

Margaret Pilkington · 01-09-2013, 10:51

Quote:

Originally Posted by cmonstanley

but we are skint we cant afford it. we let or own people live off food banks now. why should we care about anybody else. its all about selling weapons dont kid yourself it was going to be done following some moral code. the link i put in has been took down by the internet police it was working fine yesterday.

Would you like to tell us...in your opinion, and preferably in punctuated english, what you would have liked to have happened in the debate over what action should be taken over the crisis in Syria?

Sorry...I forgot. You don't do discussion or debate...you rely on posting dubious links from publications......and cut and paste stuff out of context.

I'm not entirely sure you really do know what should be the outcome.
If, as you say, we haven't got the money to indulge in a conflict, then shouldn't you be rejoicing that we aren't going to be involved.

Nations who want to go to war always find the money from somewhere...even if that is at the expense of budgets at home.