Area Management Calendars 2010 - Page 12

jaysay · 25-12-2009, 11:29

Quote:

Originally Posted by g jones

Kim is enjoying cooking and Alana I asleep after opening her presents from 8am.

With a gap and listening to the radio rather than watching the box Ive a moment to say as a passionate Hyndburnite,

I didn't post twice deliberatly John, twas accident.

And on that note: a very Merry Christmas to all. Wish you all well.

Go on then Graham seeing its Christmas I'll believe you

May I just say what a nice name you gave your little one, unusual, cannot say I've heard that name before

garinda · 25-12-2009, 11:36

Quote:

Originally Posted by jaysay

Go on then Graham seeing its Christmas I'll believe you

May I just say what a nice name you gave your little one, unusual, cannot say I've heard that name before

Good will to all men!

You being nice to Graham?

Next you'll be trimming poor Tiny Tim's crutch with tinsel, and sending for the biggest turkey in the shop to be delived to the Cratchit's house.

God bless us everyone, and long may this mutual respect continue.

I've got a football, if you two want to have a knock about in no man's land.

jaysay · 25-12-2009, 11:47

Quote:

Originally Posted by garinda

Good will to all men!

You being nice to Graham?

Next you'll be trimming poor Tiny Tim's crutch with tinsel, and sending for the biggest turkey in the shop to be delived to the Cratchit's house.

God bless us everyone, and long may this mutual respect continue.

I've got a football, if you two want to have a knock about in no man's land.

As you said tis the season of good will to all men, even Graham, but forget the football, can't make it to France

claytonender · 25-12-2009, 13:28

Quote:

Originally Posted by jaysay

As you said tis the season of good will to all men, even Graham, but forget the football, can't make it to France

At least you both support the same football team.

Merry Christmas everyone.

Neil · 25-12-2009, 14:21

This thread was boring enough before you lot mentioned football

cashman · 26-12-2009, 02:33

Quote:

Originally Posted by andrewb

I am criticising both sides. Tells a lot when you still cannot answer the question given. Blind faith. Suppose it is Christmas.

the question andrew,is a non question in my book, the "Whole" point is simple, its a waste of public money, simple as that. the fact you are too slow to see it is not my fault.

i would still say the same if the boot were on the other foot n labour held majority in town n they did it, summat thats well beyond you.

Mancie · 26-12-2009, 03:41

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wynonie Harris

From a local calendar in Ossy to political sheenanigans in East London in 158 posts. I love Accyweb!

Merry Christmas.

well it wern't me that started all this jack n orny was it guv?..Iim just a bloke shovin his 2 pence in!

jaysay · 26-12-2009, 11:05

Quote:

Originally Posted by claytonender

At least you both support the same football team.

Merry Christmas everyone.

You mean he has something in common with PB too

Wynonie Harris · 26-12-2009, 11:15

Quote:

Originally Posted by jaysay

You mean he has something in common with PB too

So, the leader of the council and the leader of the opposition, both don't support the local football club?

Disgraceful.

Thread wander? Moi?

jaysay · 26-12-2009, 11:39

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wynonie Harris

So, the leader of the council and the leader of the opposition, both don't support the local football club?

Disgraceful.

Thread wander? Moi?

Ya wander back to the Stanley section

Rovers is local football club anyway

Wynonie Harris · 26-12-2009, 11:48

Quote:

Originally Posted by jaysay

Ya wander back to the Stanley section

Rovers is local football club anyway

It's not in the borough these councillors represent. They should be turning up regularly to support the borough's football league club. Cashy manages it and he's a Rovers fan. Why can't they?

Neil · 26-12-2009, 11:53

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wynonie Harris

It's not in the borough these councillors represent. They should be turning up regularly to support the borough's football league club.

Why should they?

You can hardly expect Local Polititions to support everything in the Borough. We have Councillors that support Burnley as well as Blackburn.

Wynonie Harris · 26-12-2009, 12:00

Quote:

Originally Posted by Neil

Why should they?

You can hardly expect Local Polititions to support everything in the Borough. We have Councillors that support Burnley as well as Blackburn.

They should be supporting things which promote the borough nationwide (which Stanley does more than anything else) and, as they're football fans in the first place, it would hardly be an ordeal for them...and the same goes for Clare Pritchard, too.

I seem to remember PB spoutng about how people should support their local football club and how important it is to the borough. Do as I say, not as I do?

andrewb · 26-12-2009, 12:07

Quote:

Originally Posted by cashman

the question andrew,is a non question in my book, the "Whole" point is simple, its a waste of public money, simple as that. the fact you are too slow to see it is not my fault.

i would still say the same if the boot were on the other foot n labour held majority in town n they did it, summat thats well beyond you.

Agree it's a waste. Have said that for some time cashy. You're choosing to ignore the below though which helps to illustrate my point. It's a waste of money but at least to some people it will be valuable. It's less valuable or useful to those people because it lacks some of the councillors contact details.

It is like saying which is more of a waste, the council flushing £500 down the loo, or the council giving Oswaldtwistle calendars for £500? Obviously flushing it down the loo isn't much use to anybody, the calendars will be useful to some people. Same monetary cost, but one is more wasteful than the other.

If I give you a piece of paper with some councillors contact details on but not others, and a piece of paper with all the councillors on. I produced them at roughly the same cost - which one is more useful to you?

Wynonie Harris · 26-12-2009, 12:18

Quote:

Originally Posted by andrewb

Agree it's a waste. Have said that for some time cashy. You're choosing to ignore the below though which helps to illustrate my point. It's a waste of money but at least to some people it will be valuable. It's less valuable or useful to those people because it lacks some of the councillors contact details.

It is like saying which is more of a waste, the council flushing £500 down the loo, or the council giving Oswaldtwistle calendars for £500? Obviously flushing it down the loo isn't much use to anybody, the calendars will be useful to some people. Same monetary cost, but one is more wasteful than the other.

If I give you a piece of paper with some councillors contact details on but not others, and a piece of paper with all the councillors on. I produced them at roughly the same cost - which one is more useful to you?

What an absolutle and utter load of bull. Face it, Andrew, it's a costly exercise in self-indulgence by a bunch of people who should be looking to cut costs to the hard-pressed local taxpayer rather than increase them and no amount of convoluted arguments about flushing things down toilets will change that.