australian hung in singapore - Page 3

SPUGGIE J · 05-12-2005, 14:14

That stupid reasonable force rule again Wolfie. Its very inconsistant.

Bad-Wolf · 05-12-2005, 14:17

It is very inconsistent.

Though the only reason I got into trouble (apparently) is because he was 16!

In my mind if they are big enough and stupid enough to attack someone on their property then they get whats coming to them!

SPUGGIE J · 05-12-2005, 14:26

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bad-Wolf

It is very inconsistent.

Though the only reason I got into trouble (apparently) is because he was 16!

In my mind if they are big enough and stupid enough to attack someone on their property then they get whats coming to them!

He proberly knew if you retaliated he would get off with it on the bases the clout you gave him was his punishment. The police cant lift him so do you instead.

Bad-Wolf · 05-12-2005, 14:30

It would not surprise me in the slightest.

What miffs me most about the current law is that you are (at least in the case of dealing with people 16and under) not allowed to defend yourself.

The irony is the bloke was bigger than me.

I think they expect us to ask them there age before we hit them back!

geoff70 · 05-12-2005, 16:26

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bad-Wolf

It would not surprise me in the slightest.

What miffs me most about the current law is that you are (at least in the case of dealing with people 16and under) not allowed to defend yourself.

The irony is the bloke was bigger than me.

I think they expect us to ask them there age before we hit them back!

thats great considering its mostly the under 16's who are carrying out all the knifings and muggings ...i wonder if they are looking any bricklayers in patagonia ,its nearly time for a move i think....

SPUGGIE J · 05-12-2005, 16:30

Be better moving to Singapore they have it as a crime to spit chuggy on the pavement. A nice clean law abiding place.

Tealeaf · 05-12-2005, 16:37

Quote:

Originally Posted by garinda

Talking of differing punishments throughout the world, interesting to note that in Saudi Arabia recently two adult men were executed recently for having a consensual affair.

Could that too be said to be live by the sword, die by the sword?

Is that with each other? They should have entered into a Civil Partnership first & made everything legal.

garinda · 05-12-2005, 19:14

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tealeaf

Is that with each other? They should have entered into a Civil Partnership first & made everything legal.

Yes.

Unlike Britain it is quite common in Saudi.

Don't get your knickers in a twist about some old queen running you up the aisle of the nearest registry office Tealeaf. Your old enough and ugly enough to say no, or alternatively knee them in the cloisters.

cashman · 06-12-2005, 00:58

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bad-Wolf

I would have to agree with you on that one Cashman.

When I caught somone breaking into my car last year (on my property as well I hasten to add) he got let off and I got into trouble becasue I gave him a bit of a slapping!

Thing is I had no choice in the matter, but becasue he comes of worse I'm the one who has to pay for it.

It seems to me that if you find intruders on your property then the law actually gives them the right to do as they please!

strange but why does that not surprise me

chav1 · 06-12-2005, 08:12

Quote:

It is very inconsistent.

Though the only reason I got into trouble (apparently) is because he was 16!

In my mind if they are big enough and stupid enough to attack someone on their property then they get whats coming to them!

have you seen the size of 16year olds these days ..? my advice to anyone who catches and intruder and fancies their chances is to beat the snot out of them and leave them in the back alley

let them ring the police and deny everything when asked, it is ridiculous that someone can eneter another peresons home and become the victim

luckily though the courts are listening/siding with the victims more these days as in the case with mr butterworth a few months ago

SPUGGIE J · 06-12-2005, 09:30

Its taken the courts long enough to realise there is 2 sides to every case and not the one of the deprived drug taking disadvantaged teen. If found in the back ally how do they prove it was you if you are smart enough.