Ceefax 124 has made my day. - Page 2

Eric · 12-02-2009, 19:40

Quote:

Originally Posted by cashman

it also means the "Prime Minister" in waiting made a complete arse of himself in front of a Full House, so the toadys tried to cover up this to save his face.

TOUGH

Maybe it's not his face, but another part of his anatomy he wants to save

Royboy39 · 12-02-2009, 19:45

Quote:

Originally Posted by cashman

this deceit of the general public,is obviously not important or the usual members would surely have commented.

Nothing new in this Cashy......He will porobably be sacked, reinstated three times and then made a 'Lord'....what say you?

cashman · 12-02-2009, 19:52

i ask myself,when someone is caught out in a Deliberate act to mislead, is that the party i can trust, NO say i.

Royboy39 · 12-02-2009, 19:58

Quote:

Originally Posted by cashman

i ask myself,when someone is caught out in a Deliberate act to mislead, is that the party i can trust, NO say i.

What about the student precis that was presented as proof of WMD in Iraq.....people have short memories but not that short.

Eric · 12-02-2009, 20:28

Quote:

Originally Posted by Royboy39

What about the student precis that was presented as proof of WMD in Iraq.....people have short memories but not that short.

True indeed ... but I think you underestimate people's willingness to swallow bs if it is presented in an attractive enough manner .... GW and Blair convince their people (or the 5% who take their heads out of the sand to look at what is happening outside of the bedrooms of the rich and famous) that Iraq has weopons of mass destruction, William Clinton convinces a whole nation that a blow job isn't sex (try that one on your wife if you get caught), Reagan convinces Americans that anyone who doesn't eat at Rotten Ronnies is a member of the axis of evil, Thatcher, while tearing at the traditional fabric of Britain, manages to convince a whole bunch of people that she is in fact a "conservative", it goes on and on ... and on ... and on .... and let's not forget "peace in our time" .... and on ............

Royboy39 · 12-02-2009, 20:34

Quote:

Originally Posted by Eric

True indeed ... but I think you underestimate people's willingness to swallow bs if it is presented in an attractive enough manner .... GW and Blair convince their people (or the 5% who take their heads out of the sand to look at what is happening outside of the bedrooms of the rich and famous) that Iraq has weopons of mass destruction, William Clinton convinces a whole nation that a blow job isn't sex (try that one on your wife if you get caught), Reagan convinces Americans that anyone who doesn't eat at Rotten Ronnies is a member of the axis of evil, Thatcher, while tearing at the traditional fabric of Britain, manages to convince a whole bunch of people that she is in fact a "conservative", it goes on and on ... and on ... and on .... and let's not forget "peace in our time" .... and on ............

Eric you can go on and on but it will never convince the Labour dyhards in GB that Labour Government will never work. Might work until all the reserves are spent...then the Sh1t hits the fan...again.

Eric · 12-02-2009, 21:02

Quote:

Originally Posted by Royboy39

Eric you can go on and on but it will never convince the Labour dyhards in GB that Labour Government will never work. Might work until all the reserves are spent...then the Sh1t hits the fan...again.

But even the traditionally laissez faire US, the govt is throwing billions at the recession ... the reserves are already spent, what they are spending now is their future ... but if this present mess doesn't get fixed the future is not all that attractive ..... but in general, I do agree .... although the Labour govt. I see in power is not the same Labour Party that my grandfathers' voted for .... seems to me that their drift to the centre carried them a little too far to the right. Who knows, maybe the British PM will develop a liking for young women and cigars ....

I often wonder why, when the feacal matter hits the swiftly rotating object, so little of it lands where it should

Royboy39 · 12-02-2009, 21:21

Quote:

Originally Posted by Eric

But even the traditionally laissez faire US, the govt is throwing billions at the recession ... the reserves are already spent, what they are spending now is their future ... but if this present mess doesn't get fixed the future is not all that attractive ..... but in general, I do agree .... although the Labour govt. I see in power is not the same Labour Party that my grandfathers' voted for .... seems to me that their drift to the centre carried them a little too far to the right. Who knows, maybe the British PM will develop a liking for young women and cigars ....

I often wonder why, when the feacal matter hits the swiftly rotating object, so little of it lands where it should

And the simple interpretation for us simple Lancahire folk Is?

Eric · 12-02-2009, 22:21

It's written in English; so I don't think interpretation is a problem .... and I don't believe Lancashire Folk are all that simple ...

cashman · 12-02-2009, 22:30

Quote:

Originally Posted by Royboy39

What about the student precis that was presented as proof of WMD in Iraq.....people have short memories but not that short.

yeh i didn't agree wi that either n thats the difference between us.

garinda · 13-02-2009, 00:52

Quote:

Originally Posted by Eric

...and I don't believe Lancashire Folk are all that simple ...

No, we shipped all the really simple ones over to of Europe, in retaliation for having joined the E.E.C.

mani · 13-02-2009, 13:38

hahahaha thanks for the heads up cashy

how stupid can u get?! what a dumbass. both cameron and the guy who edited it.

i'm beginnin to hate cameron for the smug kinda attitude he has.